Abstract:<p>Collective cooperation is essential to human society, and it exists in many social dilemmas. In the scenario of a collective-risk social dilemma, a group of players have to collectively contribute to a public fund to prevent the tragedy of the commons, such as dangerous climate change, because everybody will lose all their remaining money when the damage happens with a certain probability if the group fails to reach a fixed fundraising target. Yet, it remains largely unclear how the group size affects the probability of reaching the collective target and the mechanism that drives different outcomes of the collective cooperation. Here, we contribute to the literature by exploring the role of group size in the collective-risk social dilemma and the potential underlying mechanism using both model simulations and human experiments. Through simulations we found that the rate of failure for collective cooperation increases for larger groups, along with the arising of bystander effect and a decrease in average contributions, which are confirmed by our experimental observations. We further analyze the patterns of investment behaviors in the experiment setting by categorizing players into cooperators, altruists, and free riders using both a clustering method and a golden standard. We found that altruists who tend to contribute more, rather than cooperators who prefer contributing a fair-share investment, play a crucial role in groups with success outcome in early and/or middle stages of the game. Our results indicate that bystanders are dynamic and their amount depends on the contribution of others. When others contribute less, bystanders also contribute less. If the collective goal is unlikely to achieve, more players choose to be bystanders who strategically contribute less, intriguing the failure of the collective goal. Our findings suggest a potentially effective way to solve the collective-risk social dilemma by reducing the bystander effect through the mechanism design of forming small groups.</p>

Reducing global inequality increases local cooperation: a simple model of group selection with a global externality

Cooperation and Charity in Spatial Public Goods Game under Different Strategy Update Rules

Environmental feedback drives cooperation in spatial social dilemmas

Evolution of Global Cooperation Driven by Risks

Does reducing inequality increase cooperation?

Evolutionary mechanisms that promote cooperation may not promote social welfare

Global network cooperation catalysed by a small prosocial migrant clique

Social goods dilemmas in heterogeneous societies

Increasing benefits in one-time public goods does not promote cooperation

Evolution of cooperation in stochastic games

Inequality, communication, and the avoidance of disastrous climate change in a public goods game

The Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Groups

Redistribution based on willingness to cooperate promotes cooperation while intensifying equality in heterogeneous populations

Cooperation can emerge in the co-evolution of the local environments

Selective Investment Promotes Cooperation in Public Goods Game

Absolute versus Relative Poverty and Wealth: Cooperation in the Presence of Between-Group Inequality

How strategy environment and wealth shape altruistic behaviour: cooperation rules affecting wealth distribution in dynamic networks

Reducing the bystander effect via decreasing group size to solve the collective-risk social dilemma

Local Sharing and Sociality Effects on Wealth Inequality in a Simple Artificial Society

Evolution of Global Cooperation and Ethnocentrism in Group-Structured Populations

Partner choice and cooperation in social dilemmas can increase resource inequality