How to Better Select SARS-CoV-2 Preservation Solution of Virus Nucleic Acid Testing.

Xiuzhi Duan,Letao Huang,Xuchu Wang,Ying Ping,Pan Yu,Weiwei Liu,Yiyi Xie,Zhihua Tao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24956
IF: 3.124
2023-01-01
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Abstract:BackgroundSampling and testing for SARS-CoV-2 is a widely recognized method for identifying patients with COVID-19. However, there is limited research available on the stability of nucleic acids in viral storage solutions.MethodsThis paper investigates the components that provide better protection for virus and nucleic acid detection. The study utilized real-time quantitative fluorescent PCR to detect SARS-CoV-2 and evaluate the preservation effect and stability of SARS-CoV-2 viral storage solution under various conditions, including different guanidinium salts, brands, and storage conditions.ResultsAll brands of inactivated virus preservation solutions demonstrated effective preservation and stability. However, 0.5 mol/L guanidine hydrochloride and guanidine isothiocyanate solutions exhibited poor antiseptic effects. Additionally, refrigerated storage showed better preservation compared to room temperature storage.ConclusionsWe recommend using inactivated virus collection solution to preserve and transport samples and testing preferably within 6 hours to reduce false negatives of NAT results. We found that the fire-extinguishing sampling tube (containing guanidine salt) had different effects on the preservation and detection of the virus due to different components, so it was necessary to verify the virus preservation solution.image
What problem does this paper attempt to address?