Abstract:Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an acute infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Reverse transcription real-time fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was the firstly authorized method for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. As this method is sensitive, specific, it has been widely recognized as the golden standard for the diagnosis of COVID-19. Unfortunately, several false-negative cases have been reported after the outbreak of COVID-19, probably due to the quality of the kits or the improper operation of RT-qPCR. Nucleic acid reference materials (RM) are the key element for the metrology traceability and quality control of SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection, but the development of RNA RM remains a challenge in the biology metrology field. Two main problems are the low stability of the RNA sample and the lack of proven absolute quantification methods. To establish the measurement traceability for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection, a novel RNA reference material (RM) was developed. The RM is a mixed solution of 3 in vitro transcribed RNA molecules which cover different key target sequences of SARS-CoV-2 gene: The full-length of nucleoprotein (N) gene (28274-29533, GenBank: MT027064.1), the full-length of envelope protein (E) gene (26245-26472, GenBank: MT027064.1), and partial sequence of open reading frame 1ab (ORF1ab) (13321-15540, GenBank: MT027064.1). The purity of the transcribed RNA molecules was verified by a biological analyzer. The results showed that the molecular length of all the RNA molecules were consistent with our design. The clear peaks of our RNA RMs strongly demonstrated good purity. For absolute quantification of RNA RMs, we studied digital PCR (dPCR) for RNA samples. Digital PCR evenly partitioned the sample and PCR reaction solution to a very large number of units, on a microporous chip or in the liquid droplets, etc. After a PCR amplification reaction, the fluorescence signal was detected for each unit individually, with a binary readout of "0" or "1" for negative and positive results respectively. Through the statistics of positive results based on the Poisson distribution, the copy number of RNA sample was accurately determined without standard curves needed. Digital PCR has significantly higher reliability and accuracy. Mainly based on the PCR primers and probes for SARS-CoV-2 detection suggested by the Chinese CDC and WHO, we optimized the key factors of dPCR towards improved amplification efficiency. Through digital PCR measurements by 4 laboratories, the certified values of concentration (copies/mu L) were assigned for the N gene, E gene, and ORF1ab gene in the mixed RM. Single-stranded RNA is unstable and easy to be degraded by RNase in the environment, thus the optimization of RNA protectants is very important for the stability of RNA RMs. During the study of the stability, we found that a proper protector (1 mmol/L DTT and 0.5 U/L Rnase Inhibitor) can effectively increase the valid storage life of our RNA RM. Based on the latest data, the concentration of our RNA RMs was stable for at least 30 d under -80 degrees C storage and 13 d under -4 degrees C storage. In order to verify the applicability of our RNA RM in the actual virus detection process, we analyzed our RMs using 9 SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection kits. These virus RNA detection kits were from different manufacturers with various detection principles, that are being applied in laboratories for virus detection. Finally, our RNA RMs showed high generalizability among 9 kits. The development of RNA RM provides the metrological basis for the quality control of SARS-CoV-2 detection kits.

Quality and composition of archived nucleic acids after use in SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing

RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal and salivary specimens: contribution of alternative collection systems and extraction processes to cope with mass screening. Interpretation of low viral loads

Evaluation of Different PCR Assay Formats for Sensitive and Specific Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA

Development of SARS-CoV-2 packaged RNA reference material for nucleic acid testing

Exploring the causes of variability in quality of oropharyngeal swab sampling for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid testing and proposed improvement measures: a multicenter, double-blind study

Nucleic Acid Testing of SARS-CoV-2

CCQM-P199b: Interlaboratory comparability study of SARS-CoV-2 RNA copy number quantification

Validation of the Analytical Performance of Nine Commercial RT-qPCR Kits for SARS-CoV-2 Detection Using Certified Reference Material.

Laboratory Verification of an RT-PCR Assay for SARS-CoV-2

SARS-CoV-2 RNA Reference Materials

Comparison of qualitative and quantitative analyses of COVID-19 clinical samples

Identification of the RNase-binding site of SARS-CoV-2 RNA for anchor primer-PCR detection of viral loading in 306 COVID-19 patients

Evaluation of Transport Media and Specimen Transport Conditions for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by Use of Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR

Evaluation of Three Automated Extraction Systems for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from Clinical Respiratory Specimens

Analytical and Clinical Validation for RT-qPCR Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Without RNA Extraction

Comparison of two digital PCR methods for EGFR DNA and SARS-CoV-2 RNA quantification

Evaluation of diagnostic performance of SARS-CoV-2 infection using digital droplet polymerase chain reaction in individuals with or without COVID-19 symptoms

Analytical sensitivity and efficiency comparisons of SARS-COV-2 qRT-PCR primer-probe sets

Analytical comparisons of SARS-COV-2 detection by qRT-PCR and ddPCR with multiple primer/probe sets

Analysis and Validation of a Highly Sensitive One-Step Nested Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Specific Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2

B-228 Performance Comparison of three viral RNA pathogens in MK Buffered Solution for Diagnostic Based Detection using quantitative PCR vs droplet digital PCR