Abstract:Aims: Recently, using the fMRI method in a paradigm in which visible word cues were followed by masked faces at a completely unconscious level or masked tools at a partially conscious level, Tu, Qiu, Martens, & Zhang [31] showed that the top-down modulation effects were in opposite directions for the two conditions. Because five different pictures of masked faces/tools were displayed in a trial, the authors proposed that the modulation effects could further interact with the Original Research Article Liu et al.; BJESBS, 7(3): 220-231, 2015; Article no.BJESBS.2015.086 221 conscious component of the partial awareness processing (i.e., awareness of the global contour change). In the present event-related potential study, we employed a paradigm similar to that of Tu et al.’s [31] except that the masked stimulus was displayed only once to test the effect of categoryselective attention on unconscious processing of picture identity and to try to investigate the above hypothesis. Study Design: Two semantic category cues (“face” or “tool”) and two types of subliminal stimuli (face or tool images) were crossed to generate four conditions: a face cue followed by a masked face picture, a face cue followed by a masked tool picture, a tool cue followed by a masked face picture, and a tool cue followed by a masked tool picture. Place and Duration of Study: Department of psychology, Institute of education, China West Normal University, between September 2013 and April 2014. Methodology: The technique of event-related potentials (ERP) was used. Results: Processing of masked face and tool images both elicited the ERP components of C1, P1, N1, and P2. In addition, C1 component between 25 ms and 55 ms was smaller in the valid category cue-word condition (face cue-word followed by masked face image & tool cue-word followed by masked tool image) than in the invalid cue-words (face cue-word followed by masked tool image & tool cue-word followed by masked face image). The other three waves, P1, N1, and P2, were found to be unaffected by the top–down modulation. Conclusion: Category-selective attention can modulate unconscious processes at an early stage of visual processing supporting the interaction hypothesis.

Unconscious face processing shows a different lateralisation pattern.

Subliminal Faces with Different Valence: Unconscious Mismatch Detection Indicates Interactions Between Unconscious Processing

Functional Lateralization of Face Processing

Lateralization of face processing in the human brain.

Inversion Effect and Hemifield Asymmetry Independently Affect How Faces Break Through Interocular Suppression

Visual adaptation and 7T fMRI reveal facial identity processing in the human brain under shallow interocular suppression

Unconscious Processing of Facial Emotional Valence Relation: Behavioral Evidence of Integration Between Subliminally Perceived Stimuli

Invisible Social Grouping Facilitates the Recognition of Individual Faces.

Sex Differences of Hemispheric Lateralization for Faces and Chinese Characters in Early Perceptual Processing.

Dissociations of Subliminal and Supraliminal Self-Face from Other-Face Processing: Behavioral and ERP Evidence

Unconscious prioritization for face-to-face people.

Category-selective Attention Modulates Unconscious Processing: Evidence from ERP

The Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus Plays an Important Role in Unconscious Information Processing: Activation Likelihood Estimation Analysis Based on Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Unconscious social integration: seeing social interactions between two invisible people

Laterality and (in)visibility in emotional face perception: Manipulations in spatial frequency content.

Early visual exposure primes future cross-modal specialization of the fusiform face area in tactile face processing in the blind

Time Course of Influence on the Allocation of Attentional Resources Caused by Unconscious Fearful Faces.

Prediction and Unconscious Attention Operate Synergistically to Facilitate Stimulus Processing: an Fmri Study.

Neural Mechanism of Unconscious Perception of Surprised Facial Expression

Twofold Advantages of Face Processing with or Without Visual Awareness.

Dissociating conscious and unconscious influences on visual detection effects