Abstract:A prominent theoretical framework spanning philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience holds that selective attention penetrates early stages of perceptual processing to alter the subjective visual experience of behaviorally relevant stimuli. For example, searching for a red apple at the grocery store might make the relevant color appear brighter and more saturated compared with seeing the exact same red apple while searching for a yellow banana. In contrast, recent proposals argue that data supporting attention-related changes in appearance reflect decision- and motor-level response biases without concurrent changes in perceptual experience. Here, we tested these accounts by evaluating attentional modulations of EEG responses recorded from male and female human subjects while they compared the perceived contrast of attended and unattended visual stimuli rendered at different levels of physical contrast. We found that attention enhanced the amplitude of the P1 component, an early evoked potential measured over visual cortex. A linking model based on signal detection theory suggests that response gain modulations of the P1 component track attention-induced changes in perceived contrast as measured with behavior. In contrast, attentional cues induced changes in the baseline amplitude of posterior alpha band oscillations (∼9-12 Hz), an effect that best accounts for cue-induced response biases, particularly when no stimuli are presented or when competing stimuli are similar and decisional uncertainty is high. The observation of dissociable neural markers that are linked to changes in subjective appearance and response bias supports a more unified theoretical account and demonstrates an approach to isolate subjective aspects of selective information processing.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Does attention alter visual appearance, or does it simply induce response bias? In the present study, we examined these competing accounts using EEG and linking models based on signal detection theory. We found that response gain modulations of the visually evoked P1 component best accounted for attention-induced changes in visual appearance. In contrast, cue-induced baseline shifts in alpha band activity better explained response biases. Together, these results suggest that attention concurrently impacts visual appearance and response bias, and that these processes can be experimentally isolated.

Dissociating conscious and unconscious influences on visual detection effects

Dissociated roles of the parietal and frontal cortices in the scope and control of attention during visual working memory.

Unconscious Processing Contaminates Objective Measures of Conscious Perception: Evidence From the Liminal Prime Paradigm

Category-selective Attention Modulates Unconscious Processing: Evidence from ERP

Unconscious Perception of Vernier Offsets

Contour Integration, Attentional Cuing, and Conscious Awareness: an Investigation on the Processing of Collinear and Orthogonal Contours.

Perceptual versus attentional impairments of conscious access: Distinct neural mechanisms despite equal task performance

Category-selective Attention Modulates Unconscious Processes in the Middle Occipital Gyrus

Perception-action Dissociations as a Window into Consciousness

Functional dissociations versus post-hoc selection: Moving beyond the Stockart et al. (2024) compromise

Invisible stimuli, implicit thresholds: Why invisibility judgments cannot be interpreted in isolation

Unconscious face processing shows a different lateralisation pattern.

Extending a focused attention paradigm to critically test for unconscious congruency effects

Subliminal Faces with Different Valence: Unconscious Mismatch Detection Indicates Interactions Between Unconscious Processing

Is subliminal face processing modulated by attentional task sets? Evidence from masked priming effects in a gender decision task

Metacognition in Putative Magno- and Parvocellular Vision

Neural correlates of unconscious and conscious visual processing

Inversion effects reveal dissociations in facial expression of emotion, gender, and object processing

Conscious and unconscious processing of ensemble statistics oppositely modulate perceptual decision-making.

Dissociable Neural Mechanisms Underlie the Effects of Attention on Visual Appearance and Response Bias

Unconscious Attention Modulates the Silencing Effect of Top-Down Predictions.