Comparison of safety and efficacy of different positions in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a network Meta-analysis
Puhan Li,Yucheng Ma,Banghua Liao,Xi Jin,Liyuan Xiang,Hong Li,Kunjie Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000001130
2024-03-04
International Journal of Surgery
Abstract:Objectives: Various new positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) were proposed to reduce the limitations of the traditional position. This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the different PCNL positions. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to April 18, 2023. We collected five common surgical positions used for PCNL: oblique supine position (OSP), supine position (SP), flank position (FP), split-leg oblique supine/flank position (SLP), and prone position (PP). Paired and network meta-analysis were conducted to compare relevant outcomes, including complications, operative time, stone free rates, hospital stay and hemoglobin loss among these different positions. Results: The study included 17 RCTs with a total of 1841 patients. The result demonstrated that SLP significantly outperformed in terms of decreasing operation time (FP vs SLP MD- MD-41.65; OSP vs SLP MD 28.97; PP vs SLP MD 34.94), hospital stay, and hemoglobin loss. Ranking probabilities showed SLP had highest stone-free rate. Prone position was more likely to occur complications than others. Based on SMAA model, the benefit-risk analysis suggested the SLP was the optimal position in PCNL. Conclusions: For PCNL, the split-leg, flank, supine, and oblique supine positions are as secure as the prone position. Further RCTs are necessary to confirm the outstanding safety and efficacy of split-leg position. Besides, the position should be selected regard for the patient’s demands, the surgeon’s preference and learning curve.
surgery