Abstract:BACKGROUND:Upper urinary tract stones are very common in my country, with an incidence of 1% to 5% in the North and an even higher incidence of 5% to 10% in the south. The incidence rate in the south is higher than that in the north, mainly due to the water quality, climate and eating habits of the region. From the perspective of sex, incidence is more likely in males than females. In the high-incidence population, young adults are most prone to stones. Men in the age range of 25 to 40 years are more likely to have stones.AIM:To observe the therapeutic effect of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) on upper urinary tract stones and its influence on the renal function of patients.METHODS:Patients with upper urinary tract stones who were treated in our hospital from February 2017 to March 2018 were selected as research subjects and were divided into the PCNL group and the mPCNL group according to the random number table method. The general conditions of the two groups of patients were observed during the perioperative period, and the differences in stone clearance, pain, renal function indicators and complication rates were compared between the two groups to determine which were statistically significant (P < 0.05).RESULTS:The operation time of the mPCNL group was longer than that of the PCNL group (t = -34.392, P < 0.001), and the intraoperative blood loss of the mPCNL group was more than that of the PCNL group (t = 34.090, P < 0.001). There was no difference in renal function indices between the two groups of patients before treatment, and there was no difference in the levels of serum creatinine, β2 microglobulin or retinol binding protein in the mPCNL group after treatment. The visual analog scale score of patients in the mPCNL group was lower than that of the PCNL group (t = 12.191, P < 0.001), and there was no significant difference in the stone clearance rate between the two groups (χ 2 value = 1.013, P = 0.314). There was no significant difference in the incidence of urine extravasation, dyspnea and peripheral organ damage between the two groups (χ 2 value = 1.053, P = 0.305). At 1 mo after treatment and 3 mo after treatment, the quality of life of the mPCNL group was lower than that of the PCNL group, and the Qmax level of the mPCNL group was higher than that of the PCNL group.CONCLUSION:mPCNL has a good therapeutic effect on upper urinary tract stones, with a high stone clearance rate without causing kidney damage or increasing the incidence of complications, and thus has good application value.

ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE The Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of the Preemptive Indwelling of Double-J Stents in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of the Preemptive Indwelling of Double-J Stents in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery with Flexible Ureteroscope for Partial Staghorn Calculi: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Total Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Without Retrograde Insertion of a Ureteral Catheter for the Treatment of Kidney Stone Patients Without Hydronephrosis: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Single-J Instead of Double-J Stent and Nephrostomy Tube after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Randomized Prospective Trial of Tubeless Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Large Renal Pelvic Calculi: a Pilot Study.

Randomized Study of Ureteral Catheter Vs Double-J Stent in Tubeless Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Patients

A Randomized Study of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) with the Aid of a Patented Suctioning Sheath in the Treatment of Renal Calculus Complicated by Pyonephrosis by One Surgery

[Clinical analysis for preset double J tube in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy]

Clinical Study on the Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Treatment of Upper Urinary Calculi

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Open Surgery in the Treatment of Urinary Calculi

Efficacy and safety of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones (> 1 cm): a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18 randomized controlled trials

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones: a meta-analysis comparing clinical efficacy and safety

Application of a Novel Intracorporeal Combined Pneumatic and Ultrasonic Lithotriptor ( CQS-01 ) in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

The Application of a Patented System to Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Stone clearance and complication rate of micro percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal stone: A randomized trial

Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy combined with retrograde intrarenal surgery and multi-tract percutaneous nephrolithotripsy for octopus stone: A propensity score-matching study

A randomized controlled study comparing the standard, tubeless, and totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures for renal stones from a tertiary care hospital

Efficacy Evaluation of Stentless Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Non-Stented Versus Routine Stented Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy