Abstract:Background Laparoscopic surgery is increasingly used for rectal cancer, but the long-term oncological outcomes for low rectal cancer have not been fully established. We aimed to evaluate the 3-year survival outcomes of laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery in the treatment of low rectal cancer. Methods This multicentre, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial was conducted at 22 tertiary hospitals in China. Individuals aged 18–75 years with histologically confirmed cT1–2N0, cT3–4aN0, or cT1–4aN1–2 rectal adenocarcinoma within 5 cm from the dentate line were eligible for inclusion. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to undergo laparoscopic surgery or open surgery. Central randomisation was conducted using a web response system, and was stratified by clinical stage, age, sex, BMI, and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification. Investigators, patients and statisticians were not masked to group allocation. The primary outcome was 3-year disease-free survival, defined as the time from the date of surgery to the date of locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Non-inferiority was defined as a lower limit of one-sided 97·5% CI for group difference (laparoscopic surgery group minus open surgery group) of greater than –10%. The primary analyses were performed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which excluded patients with distant metastasis discovered during surgery and those who did not undergo surgery or underwent local resection only. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01899547, and has been completed. Findings Between Nov 12, 2013, and June 6, 2018, 1070 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to treatment. 1039 patients (685 in the laparoscopic surgery group and 354 in the open surgery group; median age 57 years, IQR 50 to 64; 620 [60%] male and 419 [40%] women) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. 3-year disease-free survival was 81·4% (95% CI 78·2 to 84·1) in the laparoscopic surgery group and 79·8% (75·2 to 83·6) in the open surgery group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·92, 95% CI 0·69 to 1·23; p=0·56). The difference between groups was 1·60% (one-sided 97·5% CI –3·34 to ∞, p<0·0001 for non-inferiority). 3-year overall survival was 91·7% (95% CI 89·3 to 93·5) in the laparoscopic surgery group and 93·7% (90·6 to 95·8) in the open surgery group (HR 1·34, 95% CI 0·82 to 2·19; p=0·24). 3-year locoregional recurrence was 3·7% (95% CI 2·5 to 5·3) and 2·3% (1·1 to 4·3), respectively (HR 1·64, 95% CI 0·74 to 3·63; p=0·22). 5-year overall survival was 84·6% (95% CI 81·5 to 87·1) and 86·6% (82·5 to 89·8) in the open group (HR 1·16, 95% CI 0·82 to 1·64; p=0·41). Interpretation Laparoscopic surgery performed by experienced surgeons is non-inferior to open surgery for 3-year disease-free survival among patients with low rectal cancer. These results support the use of laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer. Funding The Key Clinical Specialty Discipline Construction Program of the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China; Minimally Invasive Medical Center Construction Program, Fujian Province, China; and Joint Funds for the Innovation of Science and Technology, Fujian Province, China.

Clinical Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer with Anal Sphincter Preservation

The application of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with preservation of anal sphincter for rectal cancer

Clinical Analysis of Laparoscopic Resection of Colorectal Cancer

Evaluation of Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Open Total Mesorectal Excision for Mid and Distal Rectal Cancer

Clinical Evaluation of Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection for Cancer of the Low Rectum

Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Versus The Open Approach In Curative Resection Of Rectal Cancer

Laparoscopic Versus Open Abdominoperineal Resection in the Treatment of Low Rectal Cancer：a Clinical Comparative Study

Influence of Different Treatment Methods of Left Colic Artery on Postoperative Rehabilitation of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Rectal Cancer

A comparative study of total endoscopic and laparoscopic assisted anterior resection for rectal cancer

Short-term Efficacy Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Laparoscopy for Patients with Rectal Cancer-a Prospective Multi-Center Study

Clinical Comparison of Short-Term Treatment Outcomes in Laparoscopic and Open Radical Resection of Rectal Carcinoma

Clinical control study of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer]

[Comparative study of clinical efficacy between abdominoperineal resection and anterior resection procedure in patients with rectal cancer].

Laparoscopy-assisted Versus Open Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer (LASRE): 3-Year Survival Outcomes of a Multicentre, Randomised, Controlled, Non-Inferiority Trial.

Short-term Outcomes of Laparoscopy-Assisted vs Open Surgery for Patients With Low Rectal Cancer: The LASRE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Analysis on 98 Cases with Low Rectal Cancer by Laparoscopic Sphincter-Preserving Radical Surgery

On the safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for middle and lower rectal cancer

Analysis of Curative Effect of Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery and Open Resection for Low Rectal Cancer

Laparoscopic-assisted Vs Open Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer: 5-Year Outcomes of the LASRE Randomized Clinical Trial.

The feasibility, safety and short-term clinical efficacy of laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer with left colonic artery (LCA) preservation and natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE)

Safety and efficacy of left colic artery preservation in laparoscopic anterior resection for lower rectal cancer