"Context" in the Leadership Studies: Content, Method and Direction for Future Research
LI Lei,XI You-min,GE Ging,LI Peng-fei,ZHANG Xiao-jun,LI Gui-quan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-6062.2013.03.001
2013-01-01
Abstract:Context has been paid more and more attention in studies for its effects on behavior and outcomes.A series of key questions have not been answered clearly.For instance,what is the of leadership? Why do scholars must consider in research? How do scholars analyze in existing studies? What improvement should scholars do in future research? This article reviews the literature with consideration in last twenty years in order to clearly answer the above-mentioned questions. This paper firstly discusses different contexts and the necessity of consideration in research.We define context of leadership as the set of factors surrounding the phenomenon or process that exerts some direct or indirect influence on it.Context contains internal(e.g.,interaction,organizational culture and climate) and external(e.g.,location,sector,policy) situations.We also give a systematic elaboration for the necessity of consideration in two aspects:(1) is a key element in research,and(2) research should study in-depth the indigenous environment. We then discuss the content and examine methods of studying in-depth and systematically.The content of is very extensive in existing studies that include internal context,such as organizational structure,culture,climate,statue,life cycle,mode of governance,policy and goals,and external context,such as religious culture,national culture,social situation and institutional environment.However,there are two major limitations:(1) current research pay more attention to the effects of lower-level internal on phenomenon or process than higher-level external context,and(2) current research is granular and fragmented in which comprehensive consideration of different contexts or different levels of and their effects on phenomenon or process are not sufficient.We discuss the analytical method of in two ways: contextualizing theory and theorizing about context,and find that studies with these two methods contain rich information.This study has two major limitations.First,in contextualizing research contexts are usually treated as variables and their moderating effects on the relationship between other variables in phenomenon are tested.Thus,a great deal of proposed theories are tested and modified ceaselessly,and such situation is likely to cause a slow development of theory.Second,in theorizing research contexts are also usually treated as variables and their direct effects on other variables in phenomenon are tested.Unfortunately,more complex theorizing studies about the effect mechanism of multiple contextual factors on phenomenon are still somewhat rare. Finally,we give a general conclusion and discussion,and point out future research directions.