Abstract:The duty to act should be determined by way of combining both the formalized examination based on law and the substantive examination based on substantive legal reasons. In the traditional classification of duties to act, the prior conduct is classified as a formalized duty under law (as the defendant of the omission offense is exact the actor commits the prior conduct) , therefore, so long as the prior conducts are restricted substantially, certain prior conducts can establish the duty to act that entails criminal liability. In China, the requirement of the "equal seriousness" of the omission and the commission by a positive act only means that an omission should also satisfy the constitutive requirements as prescribed by the criminal law. In the context of commission, the killing by a positive act is the cause of the death, and the defendant has control over such cause. Therefore, to establish an omission constitutes murder also requires the defendant has control over the cause of death. In this sense, it is right and acceptable to restrict the substantive requirement of a duty to act to the control over the cause. When the defendant commits a dangerous prior conduct and takes no positive measures to prevent the occurrence of the actual harm, he or she still has control over the cause. Specifically, if a prior conduct creates a source of danger to the legal interest protected by the criminal law, and the danger is so magnified that will be imminently materialized into actual harm without positive measures, the defendant has control over the cause of the actual harm. Omissions, offenses with justificatory defenses, offenses of negligence and intentional offenses may all become the prior conduct which results in the duty to act. Dangerous prior conducts give rise to the duty to act not only for a derivative omission offense, but also for a non-typical genuine omission offense.

On Some Problems of Indirect Intent

Intention regulates conflicting desires in human decision making

Also On the Function of Personal Danger in Chinese Criminal Law——Discuss with Researcher You Wei &Judge Lu Jianhong

The Studies of Negligent Crime

Knowledge of Illegality Is not a Element of Intent

On Primary Guilty Mind

From a Comparative Law Perspective to Study the Intentional Object of the Insurance Contract Deliberate Disclaimer

Consequences Occurred Presumably and Negligent Crime

On "intent" in research misconduct

On Harmful Behavior in Purely Intoxicated State

The Criminal Law's Problem and Value Orientation in the Xiao Zhijun Case—a New Explanationof the Inaction,causal Relation and Indirect Intention

On Potential Damage for Negligence Offense of Negligently Causing Serious Accident Crime

Definitions of intent suitable for algorithms

Study on Offence Form of Negligently Causing Serious Accident Crime

Consequence and Discretionary Action of Sentencing ——the Prohibition of Consequential Responsibility, Double Evaluation and Indirect Punishment

The Problem of Whether There Is Discontinuation after the Emergence of a Legal Dangerous State

On the Stipulation"Avoidance of Responsibility Leading to Death" in Traffic Offence

Prior Conduct of Omission Offenses

A Bayesian Approach to Direct and Inverse Abstract Argumentation Problems

On the Theory of Objective Imputation and the Judicial Practice in China

The Criminal Intent in American Criminal Law and its Special Provisions in Murder