The Effect of Self-efficacy on Gamblers' Fallacy
Wu Meng,Weng Xuedong,Sun Ling,Bai Xinwen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2013.01.013
2013-01-01
Abstract:Gambler's fallacy is the belief that if deviations from the expected behaviors are observed in repeated independent trials of some random processes,future deviations in the opposite direction are then more likely.When people judge the probability of an uncertain event,gambler's fallacy often occurs.Stock performance is also uncertain.So gambler's fallacy appears in the stock market investment. The purpose of this research is to investigate when the gambler's fallacy occurs in stock investment and what affects its frequency. Besides,how the investors' personality,especially their self-efficacy(SE),moderates the relationship between stocks' factors and gambler's fallacy is also discussed. A total of 83 stock investors in China participated in this research.In order to measure the frequency of gambler's fallacy,stocks' K-lines with trends(up or down) were used in this study.According to four kinds of trends(short-up,short-down,long-up,longdown), we chose 10 pictures for each of these trends.Subjects were asked to judge the current trend(up or down) and the future price (increase or decrease) of each of the stocks.When they suggested that the price wound increase in a down-trend or decrease in an uptrend, gambler's fallacy occurred.Besides,Schwarze's general self-efficacy scale was used to measure investors' self-efficacy (α=.86). The hierarchical linear modeling(HLM) was used in data analysis because of the nested structure,i.e.,the trend duration and direction as the intra-personal variable was nested in self-efficacy(personal variable).The results indicated that the duration(β= -.65,t = -2.44,p <.05 ) and direction(β= -.66,t = -3.424,p <.01 ) of the trend have both main effect and interaction effect (β=.80,t = 2.80,p <.01 ).Specifically,in the down trend,the frequency of gambler's fallacy was more in short-trend than in long-trend(βdown trend = -.65,t = -2.44,p <.05),and most likely occurred under short-down condition(F = 10.05,p < .01).Besides,investors with high self-efficacy(one SD above average) showed more fallacies in short-trend than in long-trend(βhigh SE = -1.10,t = -3.17,p <.01),while people with low self-efficacy did not have this difference.It means that self-efficacy negatively moderated the relationship between trends' duration and gambler's fallacy. The results indicated that investors' speculation and losing aversion made them show more fallacies in short-down trends.Interestingly, self-efficacy,often had a positive correlation with performance,negatively moderated the relationship between trends' durations and gambler's fallacy.Vancouver et al.found that people with high self-efficacy often showed overconfident and had more logic errors under uncertain circumstances.Therefore,investors,facing with the uncertain stock market,were probably overconfident and made more mistakes in decision making processes.Finally,implications and contributions were discussed.