Abstract:Overconfidence behavior, one form of positive illusion, has drawn considerable attention throughout history because it is viewed as the main reason for many crises. Investors' overconfidence, which can be observed as overtrading following positive returns, may lead to inefficiencies in stock markets. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the presence of investor overconfidence by employing an artificial intelligence technique and a nonlinear approach to impulse responses to analyze the impact of different return regimes on the overconfidence attitude. We examine whether investors in an emerging stock market (Borsa Istanbul) exhibit overconfidence behavior using a feed-forward, neural network, nonlinear Granger causality test and nonlinear impulse-response functions based on local projections. These are the first applications in the relevant literature due to the novelty of these models in forecasting high-dimensional, multivariate time series. The results obtained from distinguishing between the different market regimes to analyze the responses of trading volume to return shocks contradict those in the literature, which is the key contribution of the study. The empirical findings imply that overconfidence behavior exhibits asymmetries in different return regimes and is persistent during the 20-day forecasting horizon. Overconfidence is more persistent in the low- than in the high-return regime. In the negative interest-rate period, a high-return regime induces overconfidence behavior, whereas in the positive interest-rate period, a low-return regime induces overconfidence behavior. Based on the empirical findings, investors should be aware that portfolio gains may result in losses depending on aggressive and excessive trading strategies, particularly in low-return regimes.

The Study on Overconfidence and Overtrading of Chinese Individual Investors

Do Investors Trade too Much? Evidence From China's Stock Markets

Managerial Overconfidence and Over-Investment: Empirical Evidence from China

Does Good Luck Make People Overconfident? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in the Stock Market

Losing by Learning? A Study of Social Trading Platform

Overconfidence, financial literacy and excessive trading

Does Communication Increase Investors’ Trading Frequency? Evidence from a Chinese Social Trading Platform

Investor Overconfidence and Idiosyncratic Volatility of Stock Returns

Retail Trading and the Cross-sectional Returns: Evidence from China

Overinvestment, Inflation Uncertainty, and Managerial Overconfidence: Firm Level Analysis of Chinese Corporations

Do the Rich Have an Informational Advantage ? Evidence Based on Account Classifications of Individual Investors

Investor Overconfidence and the Increase in Idiosyncratic Risk

Investment and Happiness:An Empirical Study of Individual Investors in China

Retail and Institutional Investor Trading Behaviors: Evidence from China

Heterogeneity in Retail Investors: Evidence from Comprehensive Account-Level Trading and Holdings Data

Experimental Study on Hot Hand Effect and Gambler's Fallacy of Chinese Investors

Which return regime induces overconfidence behavior? Artificial intelligence and a nonlinear approach

Internet sentiment exacerbates intraday overtrading, evidence from A-Share market

Noise Traders, Firm-Specific Uncertainty and Technical Trading Effectiveness

Impact of heterogeneous Confidences on investment Style

Firms' profit instability and the cross-section of stock returns: Evidence from China