Pharmacogenetic Profiling Across the Doxorubicin Pathway in Asian Breast Cancer Patients

Edwin Sandanaraj,Sunil K. Lal,Xiaoqiang Xiang,Edmund Lee,Balram Chowbay
IF: 13.801
2007-01-01
Clinical Cancer Research
Abstract:A60 The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of genetic variations in genes encoding doxorubicin metabolizing enzymes carbonyl reductases 1 and 3 ( CBR1 and CBR3 ) and ATP-binding cassette transporters ( ABCB1 and ABCC5 ) on the pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin in Asian breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (N=48). Patients received doxorubicin (range: 56-61 mg/m 2 ) as a 20 minutes intravenous infusion and blood samples were collected at 0, 0.5, 1, 4, 8 and 24hrs. Non-linear mixed effect modeling was applied for the analysis of concentration-time profile of doxorubicin (NONMEM version 6). Doxorubicin pharmacokinetics was best described by a two-compartmental model, which included inter-individual variability (IIV) in terms of the fixed effect parameters [total plasma clearance (CL), the inter-compartmental clearance (Q) and the volume of distribution in central and peripheral compartments (V1 and V2)]. IIV was modeled based on an exponential relationship with fixed effect parameters and residual error model was described by the combination of additive and proportional equations. Model estimate for doxorubicin clearance (CL) was 44.7 L/h and inter-compartmental clearance (Q) was 46.8 L/h. The apparent volume of distribution in central compartment (V1) and peripheral compartment (V2) was 18.2 L and 537 L, respectively. Among the genetic and non-genetic covariates investigated, patient weight and CBR1 . 219G>C genotype showed significant associations with pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin. CBR3 which has minimal relative tissue expression compared to CBR1 did not show any influence on pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin. Weight alone explained 5.2% of inter-individual variability on doxorubicin clearance. The patients harbouring CBR1 . 219G>C observed 9% less clearance than the wild type (CL Lhr - 1: GG vs GC+CC: 48.2 ± 10.4 vs 41.8 ± 7.2; P = 0.03) and the exposure level was significantly higher in patients homozygous for the CBR1 . 219C allele (AUC μg hr L -1 : GG vs GC+CC: 1987 ± 376 vs 2275 ± 348.5; P = 0.045). The proposed population pharmacokinetic model incorporating patient weight and CBR1 genotype status explained 22% of total variability in the clearance of doxorubicin in Asian breast cancer patients. No significant association of genetic and non genetic covariates on the pharmacokinetic parameters of doxorubicinol was observed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?