Molecular Mechanisms of Interethnic Differences in Irinotecan Disposition: Impact of Variants in Abcg2.

C Balram,J Li,Qy Zhou,Eh Tan,Rh Mathijssen,Rh Van Schaik,J Verweij,A Sparreboom,Sd Baker
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.23.16_suppl.2018
IF: 45.3
2005-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:2018 Background: ABCG2 is an efflux transporter involved in the biliary secretion of the irinotecan metabolites SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G). The ABCG2 421C>A polymorphism is associated with decreased protein expression in vitro, and may be associated with increased sensitivity to irinotecan treatment. Here, we evaluated the impact of ABCG2 variants (-19572–19569)delCTCA and 421C>A on the disposition of irinotecan. Methods: Dose-normalized irinotecan pharmacokinetic parameters and ABCG2 genotype were determined in 29 Asian and 31 Caucasian patients receiving the drug as a 1.5-h infusion. Results: ABCG2 421C>A was more common in Asians than Caucasians (allele frequency, 0.29 vs 0.11; P<.05), but ABCG2 (-19572–19569)delCTCA was not. The haplotype frequency of both wild-type alleles at the two loci (CTCA-C) was similar in Asians and Caucasians (0.42 vs 0.45), while those of delCTCA-C (0.29 vs 0.44), CTCA-A (0.25 vs 0.11), and delCTCA-A (0.04 vs 0) were ethnically dependent. Asians had a lower irinotecan area under the curve (AUC, 13 ± 5.5 vs 21 ± 6.6 μg.h/ml; P < .0001) and a higher SN-38G AUC (20 ± 11 vs 2.7 ± 1.7 μg.h/ml; P < .0001). SN-38 AUC was higher in Asians (0.53 ± 0.27 vs 0.46 ± 0.37 μg.h/ml; P = .37), as were the AUC ratios of SN-38 to irinotecan (REC, 0.044 ± 0.020 vs 0.021 ± 0.010) and SN-38G to SN-38 (REG, 54 ± 62 vs 7.5 ± 5.1; P < .0001). In 21 patients with at least one variant ABCG2 421C>A allele, the mean REC and SN-38G AUC were 42% and 74% higher, respectively, than those with the wild-type sequence (P < .05); SN-38 AUC was 44% higher in those with the variant allele (P = .08). Patients with the combined CTCA-A genotype for the two variants had an increased REC compared to the delCTCA-C genotype group (0.047 ± 0.027 vs 0.026 ± 0.015; P < .05). Conclusions: ABCG2 genotype status accounts, in part, for the observed differences in irinotecan disposition between Asian and Caucasian cancer patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?