Vitrectomy with Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Macular Hole Retinal Detachment in High Myopia: a Systematic Review of Literature and Meta-Analysis

Qian Xu,Jie Luan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-019-0458-3

IF: 4.4563

2019-01-01

Eye

Abstract:To evaluate the effect of vitrectomy with inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap for the treatment of macular hole retinal detachment (MHRD) in high myopia compared with that of ILM peeling. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Ovid, Wan Fang and CNKI were systematically reviewed. The primary outcome parameters were the MH closure rate, retinal reattachment rate and postoperative BCVA. Secondary outcome parameters, included intraoperative or postoperative complications. Seven retrospective comparative studies including 228 eyes were selected. No significant difference was detected in either postoperative BCVA (MD −0.07; 95% CI: −0.17 to 0.03; p = 0.16) or the improvement in postoperative BCVA (MD −0.17; 95% CI: −0.50 to 0.16; p = 0.32) between the ILM flap group and ILM peeling group. The retinal reattachment rate using inverted ILM flap was not significantly different from that using ILM peeling (odds ratio (OR) 2.24; 95% CI: 0.75–6.73; p = 0.15). The MH closure rate was higher with inverted ILM flap than with ILM peeling (OR 11.86; 95% CI: 5.65 to 24.92; p < 0.00001). There was no significant difference in intraoperative or postoperative complications, including concomitant cataract rate (OR 1.22; 95% CI: 0.42–3.58; p = 0.71). The inverted ILM flap technique could contribute to a higher MH closure rate than ILM peeling, but visual improvement was similar. Both surgical methods could obtain a high-retinal reattachment rate with fewer intraoperative and postoperative complications.