Abstract:The “unknown heritage” is the name usually given to a problem type in whose archetype a father leaves to his first son 1 monetary unit and \({\frac{1}{n}}\) (n usually being 7 or 10) of what remains, to the second 2 units and \({\frac{1}{n}}\) of what remains, and so on. In the end, all sons get the same, and nothing remains. The earliest known occurrence is in Fibonacci’s Liber abbaci, which also contains a number of much more sophisticated versions, together with a partial algebraic solution for one of these and rules for all which do not follow from his algebraic calculation. The next time the problem turns up is in Planudes’s late thirteenth century Calculus according to the Indians, Called the Great. After that the simple problem type turns up regularly in Provençal, Italian and Byzantine sources. It seems never to appear in Arabic or Indian writings, although two Arabic texts (one from c. 1190) contain more regular problems where the number of shares is given; they are clearly derived from the type known from European and Byzantine works, not its source. The sophisticated versions turn up again in Barthélemy de Romans’ Compendy de la praticque des nombres (c. 1467) and, apparently inspired from there, in the appendix to Nicolas Chuquet’s Triparty (1484). Apart from a single trace in Cardano’s Practica arithmetice et mensurandi singularis, the sophisticated versions never surface again, but the simple version spreads for a while to German practical arithmetic and, more persistently, to French polite recreational mathematics. Close examination of the texts shows that Barthélemy cannot have drawn his familiarity with the sophisticated rules from Fibonacci. It also suggests that the simple version is originally either a classical, strictly Greek or Hellenistic, or a medieval Byzantine invention; and that the sophisticated versions must have been developed before Fibonacci within an environment (located in Byzantium, Provence, or possibly in Sicily?) of which all direct traces has been lost, but whose mathematical level must have been quite advanced.

Leonardo Fibonacci and Abbaco Culture. A Proposal to Invert the Roles

"Proportions" in the Liber abbaci

Fibonacci – Protagonist or Witness? Who Taught Catholic Christian Europe about Mediterranean Commercial Arithmetic?

A Pedagogical Legacy? Abacus Tradition and Surprising Connections. From the Liber Abaci (1202) to the economic education in Early Modern Period

OBSERVATIONS AND REFLECTIONS CONCERNING THE FIRST VOLUME OF A NEW EDITION OF THE <i>LIBER ABBACI</i>

What did the abbacus teachers really do when they (sometimes) ended up doing mathematics?

Annotated square root computation in Liber Abaci and De Practica Geometrie by Fibonacci

Jacopo Da Firenze and the Beginning of Italian Vernacular Algebra

The "unknown Heritage": Trace of A Forgotten Locus of Mathematical Sophistication

Fifteenth-century Italian Symbolic Algebraic Calculation with Four and Five Unknowns

On the Square Root Computation in Liber Abaci and De Practica Geometrie by Fibonacci

Reinventing or Borrowing Hot Water? Early Latin and Tuscan Algebraic Operations with Two Unknowns

La Notion D'irrationalitÉ Selon Un MathÉmaticien Du Xe SiÈcle: Abū Ja'far Al-Khāzin

Advanced Arithmetic from Twelfth-Century al-Andalus, Surviving Only (and Anonymously) in Latin Translation?A Narrative that Was Never Told

THE STATUS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE IN ANCIENT, ISLAMIC AND MEDIEVAL LATIN CONTEXTS

EXPLICIT AND LESS EXPLICIT ALGORITHMIC THINKING, 1200-1500. JORDANUS DE NEMORE, AND THE CONTRAST BETWEEN BARTHELEMY DE ROMANS ET CHUQUET

Leonardo and Theoretical Mathematics

Interpreting the infinitesimal mathematics of Leibniz and Euler

Essays on Early Medieval Mathematics: the Latin Tradition - by Menso Folkerts

The Peculiar Destiny of Sentiment de Monsieur Leibnitz (May 1705 -- March 1706)

From the Practice of Explanation to the Ideology of Demonstration: an Informal Essay