Abstract:The “unknown heritage” is the name usually given to a problem type in whose archetype a father leaves to his first son 1 monetary unit and \({\frac{1}{n}}\) (n usually being 7 or 10) of what remains, to the second 2 units and \({\frac{1}{n}}\) of what remains, and so on. In the end, all sons get the same, and nothing remains. The earliest known occurrence is in Fibonacci’s Liber abbaci, which also contains a number of much more sophisticated versions, together with a partial algebraic solution for one of these and rules for all which do not follow from his algebraic calculation. The next time the problem turns up is in Planudes’s late thirteenth century Calculus according to the Indians, Called the Great. After that the simple problem type turns up regularly in Provençal, Italian and Byzantine sources. It seems never to appear in Arabic or Indian writings, although two Arabic texts (one from c. 1190) contain more regular problems where the number of shares is given; they are clearly derived from the type known from European and Byzantine works, not its source. The sophisticated versions turn up again in Barthélemy de Romans’ Compendy de la praticque des nombres (c. 1467) and, apparently inspired from there, in the appendix to Nicolas Chuquet’s Triparty (1484). Apart from a single trace in Cardano’s Practica arithmetice et mensurandi singularis, the sophisticated versions never surface again, but the simple version spreads for a while to German practical arithmetic and, more persistently, to French polite recreational mathematics. Close examination of the texts shows that Barthélemy cannot have drawn his familiarity with the sophisticated rules from Fibonacci. It also suggests that the simple version is originally either a classical, strictly Greek or Hellenistic, or a medieval Byzantine invention; and that the sophisticated versions must have been developed before Fibonacci within an environment (located in Byzantium, Provence, or possibly in Sicily?) of which all direct traces has been lost, but whose mathematical level must have been quite advanced.

OBSERVATIONS AND REFLECTIONS CONCERNING THE FIRST VOLUME OF A NEW EDITION OF THE <i>LIBER ABBACI</i>

"Proportions" in the Liber abbaci

Leonardo Fibonacci and Abbaco Culture. A Proposal to Invert the Roles

Fibonacci – Protagonist or Witness? Who Taught Catholic Christian Europe about Mediterranean Commercial Arithmetic?

Annotated square root computation in Liber Abaci and De Practica Geometrie by Fibonacci

Fifteenth-century Italian Symbolic Algebraic Calculation with Four and Five Unknowns

Lost in translation: Pacioli's de computis et scripturis

Jacopo Da Firenze and the Beginning of Italian Vernacular Algebra

A Pedagogical Legacy? Abacus Tradition and Surprising Connections. From the Liber Abaci (1202) to the economic education in Early Modern Period

On the Square Root Computation in Liber Abaci and De Practica Geometrie by Fibonacci

[On the astrology and computation in the 12th century: new unpublished manuscripts]

Observations on continued fractions

Reinventing or Borrowing Hot Water? Early Latin and Tuscan Algebraic Operations with Two Unknowns

Essays on Early Medieval Mathematics: the Latin Tradition - by Menso Folkerts

The "unknown Heritage": Trace of A Forgotten Locus of Mathematical Sophistication

La Notion D'irrationalitÉ Selon Un MathÉmaticien Du Xe SiÈcle: Abū Ja'far Al-Khāzin

Archimedes and the elements: Proposal for a revised chronological ordering of the Archimedean corpus

The Peculiar Destiny of Sentiment de Monsieur Leibnitz (May 1705 -- March 1706)

Jacobus De Florentia,Tractatus Algorismi(1307), the Chapter on Algebra (vat. Lat. 4826, Fols 36V-45V)

Fabrizio Bònoli;, Giuseppe Bezza;, Salvo De Meis;, Cinzia Colavita (editors). I Pronostici Di Domenico Maria Da Novara. Vii + 317 Pp., Illus., Tables, Bibl., Index. Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 2012. €34 (Paper).

Fibonacci sums and divisibility properties