The Long and the Short of Asset Prices: Using Long Run Consumption-Return Correlations to Test Asset Pricing Models

Jianfeng Yu

2009-01-01

Abstract:expected returns to the cyclical fluctuations in consumption. The models by Bansal and Yaron (2004) and Panageas and Yu (2005) provide examples of such models.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Using Long-Run Consumption-Return Correlations to Test Asset Pricing Models

Jianfeng Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2012.04.001

IF: 1.712

2012-01-01

Review of Economic Dynamics

Abstract:This paper examines a new set of implications for existing asset pricing models regarding the correlation between returns and consumption growth over both the short run and the long run. The findings suggest that external habit formation models face a challenge in producing two robust facts in aggregate data, namely, that stock market returns lead consumption growth, and that the correlation between returns and consumption growth is higher at low frequencies. To reconcile these facts with a consumption-based model, I demonstrate the need for focusing on models that contain a forward-looking consumption component, i.e., models that allow for both trend and cyclical fluctuations in consumption, and that link returns to cyclical fluctuations in consumption. Long-run risk models provide examples of models that contain this consumption component.
Bank credit, consumption risk, and the cross-section of expected returns

Ji Ho Kwon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103103

IF: 8.235

2024-01-25

International Review of Financial Analysis

Abstract:Although the consumption capital asset pricing model has an unmatched theoretical purity for assets' risk, the empirical failure of the model stands as a central finding in asset pricing. In an effort to resuscitate consumption-based asset pricing model, we develop and estimate new conditional consumption capital asset pricing models with bank credit growth and bank credit cycle as conditioning variables. Rather than assuming the constant factor loadings of asset returns on consumption growth, we model time-varying consumption beta as a function of bank credit growth or bank credit cycle. We find that our specifications explain satisfactorily the variation in stock returns across the 25 Fama–French portfolios. Moreover, the strict statistical tests on risk price and explanatory power show that the models compare favorably with other renowned asset pricing models. These findings document that the dispersion of expected returns is the outcome of the degree of reward for consumption risk, thereby being consistent with asset pricing theory.

business, finance
Asset Return Predictability in A Heterogeneous Agent Equilibrium Model

Murray Carlson,David A. Chapman,Ron Kaniel,Hong Yan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/s201013921550010x

2015-01-01

Quarterly Journal of Finance

Abstract:We use a general equilibrium model as a laboratory for generating predictable excess returns and for assessing the properties of the estimated consumption/portfolio rules, under both the empirical and the true dynamics of excess returns. The advantage of this approach, relative to the existing literature, is that the equilibrium model delineates the precise nature of the risk/return trade-off within an optimizing setting that endogenizes return predictability. In the experiments that we consider, the estimation issues are so severe that simple unconditional consumption and portfolio rules actually outperform (in a utility cost sense) both simple and bias-corrected empirical estimates of conditionally optimal policies.
THE SPIRIT OF CAPITALISM, NON-EXPECTED UTILITY AND ASSET PRICING

YH Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0252-9602(17)30524-6

1999-01-01

Acta Mathematica Scientia

Abstract:This paper investigates testable restrictions on the time-series behavior of consumption and asset returns implied by a representative agent model with the spirit of capitalism in which intertemporal preference is represented by a utility function that generalizes conventional, time-additive, expected utility. In the recursive structure of preference, the author examines the implication for cosumptions, portfolio holdings, and stock-market prices when investors accumulate wealth not only for the sake of consumption but also for wealth-induced social status. When investors care about relative social status, the propensity to consume and risk-taking behavior will depend on social standards, and stock prices will be volatible. Hence, the spirit of capitalism seems to be a driving force behind stock-market volatility and economic growth. Because the elasticity df substitution and the coefficient of relative risk aversion are independent and the spirit of capitalism is introduced, the equity premium puzzle can be partially explained in the model.
On Measuring the Economic Significance of Asset Return Predictability

Murray D. Carlson,David A. Chapman,Ron Kaniel,Hong Yan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.293422

2001-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:A number of recent studies have measured the quantitative effect of excess return predictability on the optimal consumption and portfolio choices of a rational investor, and they have used the utility costs of ignoring predictability as a natural measure of economic significance. We use a general equilibrium model as a laboratory for generating predictable excess returns and for assessing the properties of the estimated consumption/portfolio rules, under both the empirical and the true dynamics of excess returns. We find that conditional rules based on ordinary least squares estimates of excess returns are severely biased, and they have a large variance across multiple simulated histories of the model. In this experiment, we find the estimation issues to be so severe that the simple unconditional consumption and portfolio rules, from Merton (1969), actually outperform (in a utility cost sense) both simple and bias-corrected empirical estimates of conditionally optimal policies.
Reference-dependent asset pricing with a stochastic consumption-dividend ratio

Luca De Gennaro Aquino,Xuedong He,Moris Simon Strub,Yuting Yang

2024-01-23

Abstract:We study a discrete-time consumption-based capital asset pricing model under expectations-based reference-dependent preferences. More precisely, we consider an endowment economy populated by a representative agent who derives utility from current consumption and from gains and losses in consumption with respect to a forward-looking, stochastic reference point. First, we consider a general model in which the agent's preferences include both contemporaneous gain-loss utility, that is, utility from the difference between current consumption and previously held expectations about current consumption, and prospective gain-loss utility, that is, utility from the difference between intertemporal beliefs about future consumption. A semi-closed form solution for equilibrium asset prices is derived for this case. We then specialize to a model in which the agent derives contemporaneous gain-loss utility only, obtaining equilibrium asset prices in closed form. Extensive numerical experiments show that, with plausible values of risk aversion and loss aversion, our models can generate equity premia that match empirical estimates. Interestingly, the models turn out to be consistent with some well-known empirical facts, namely procyclical variation in the price-dividend ratio and countercyclical variation in the conditional expected equity premium and in the conditional volatility of the equity premium. Furthermore, we find that prospective gain-loss utility is necessary for the model to predict reasonable values of the price-dividend ratio.

Mathematical Finance,General Finance
Regime Shifts in a Long-Run Risks Model of Stock and Treasury Bond Markets

Kai Li,Chenjie Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/cfri-06-2022-0106

2022-01-01

China Finance Review International

Abstract:PurposeThis paper aims to study the asset pricing implications for stock and bond markets in a long-run risks (LRR) model with regime shifts. This general equilibrium framework can not only generate sign-switching stock-bond correlations and bond risk premium, but also quantitatively reproduce various other salient empirical features in stock and bond markets, including time-varying equity and bond return premia, regime shifts in real and nominal yield curves, the violation of the expectations hypothesis of bond returns.Design/methodology/approachThe researchers study the joint determinants of stock and bond returns in a LRR model framework with regime shifts in consumption and inflation dynamics. In particular, the means, volatilities, and the correlation structure between consumption growth and inflation are regime-dependent.FindingsThe model shows that the term structure of interest rates and stock-bond correlation are intimately related to business cycles, while LRR play a more important role in accounting for high equity premium than do business cycle risks.Originality/valueThis paper studies the joint determinants of stock and bond returns in a Bansal and Yaron (2004) type of LRR framework. This rational expectations general equilibrium framework can (1) jointly match the dynamics of consumption, inflation and cash flow; (2) generate time-varying and sign-switching stock and bond correlations, as well as generating sign-switching bond risk premium; and (3) coherently explain another long list of salient empirical features in stock and bond markets, including time-varying equity and bond return premia, regime shifts in real and nominal yield curves, the violation of the expectations hypothesis of bond returns.
New Test of Asset Pricing Models in China

Hai Lin,Yongmiao Hong

2013-01-01

Abstract:Asset Pricing is a longstanding problem in finance. In this paper, we evaluate both the one factor model and the Fama-French three factor model for the Chinese capital market from 1997-2004. The model specifications include (i) without an intercept, (ii) with an intercept and (iii) with a jump component. A generalized spectral derivative test recently proposed by Hong and Lee (2005a, 2005b) is used for model specification analysis. The empirical results show that the intercept does not help improve the goodness of fit for both one factor and three factor models. Moreover, it cannot reduce the model specification error either. Although jump factors could greatly improve the goodness of fit of asset pricing models, it has little impact on reducing the specification errors. BM and SIZE factors could efficiently improve the goodness of fit of asset pricing models and reduce the specification error, indicating that BM and HML are important for explaining the change of stock returns. However, not all portfolios passed the Hong and Lee (2005a, 2005b) test. There exist some unexplained parts in Chinese stock returns. Other risk factors or nonlinear return relationships should be considered to explain Chinese capital asset returns.
Price and Payoff Autocorrelations in a Multi-Period Consumption-Based Asset Pricing Model

Victor Olkhov

2024-03-24

Abstract:This paper highlights the hidden dependence of the basic pricing equation of a multi-period consumption-based asset pricing model on price and payoff autocorrelations. We obtain the approximations of the basic pricing equation that describe the mean price "to-day," mean payoff "next-day," price and payoff volatilities, and price and payoff autocorrelations. The deep conjunction of the consumption-based model with other versions of asset pricing, such as ICAPM, APM, etc. (Cochrane, 2001), emphasizes that our results are valid for other pricing models.

General Economics,Pricing of Securities
Estimating Expected Asset Returns with the Present Value Model of Consumption and Fed Forecasts

Narayan Kundan Kishor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejm-2024-0084

2024-11-08

The B E Journal of Macroeconomics

Abstract:This paper utilizes Greenbook forecasts of consumption and income to estimate expected asset returns through a present value model of consumption. The study finds that, despite the valuable information contained in Greenbook forecasts, the expected asset returns obtained from this approach do not provide meaningful insights into future asset returns. This contrasts with previous literature suggesting predictability using the present-value model.

economics
Consumption Strikes Back? Measuring Long-Run Risk

Lars Peter Hansen,John C. Heaton,Nan Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/588200

IF: 9.637

2008-01-01

Journal of Political Economy

Abstract:We characterize and measure a long‐term risk‐return trade‐off for the valuation of cash flows exposed to fluctuations in macroeconomic growth. This trade‐off features risk prices of cash flows that are realized far into the future but continue to be reflected in asset values. We apply this analysis to claims on aggregate cash flows and to cash flows from value and growth portfolios by imputing values to the long‐run dynamic responses of cash flows to macroeconomic shocks. We explore the sensitivity of our results to features of the economic valuation model and of the model cash flow dynamics.
Accounting for Human Capital and Weak Identification in Evaluating the Epstein-Zin-Weil Non-Expected Utility Model of Asset Pricing

Qiang Zhang

2004-01-01

Abstract:In this paper, I first develop a new approach to estimating the return on the aggregate wealth portfolio that accounts for human capital and financial assets other than stocks. Using the estimated return on the wealth portfolio and the quarterly U.S. aggregate data on consumption and asset returns from 1959 to 2001, I then test the asset pricing and consumption implications of the Epstein and Zin (1991) and Weil (1990) model by employing the weak-identification robust tests of Stock and Wright's (2000) in the context of continuous updating generalized method of moments. In contrast with previous studies that ignored human capital and weak identification in evaluating this model, I find that its asset pricing implications cannot be rejected at conventional significance levels for reasonable parameter values. For example, the 95% confidence sets for unknown parameters include values of the relative risk aversion around 2 or lower, values of the elasticity of intertemporal substitution for consumption closely around 1, and the time discount factor around 0.987. Some of these parameter value combinations are able to simultaneously match the average equity premium and the average riskfree rate in the data. Furthermore, they imply that the dominant determinant of the equity premium is, surprisingly, the volatility of stock returns, the risk factor in the traditional capital asset pricing model.
Estimating and testing investment-based asset pricing models

Frederico Belo,Yao Deng,Juliana Salomao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2024.103945

IF: 8.9

2024-09-22

Journal of Financial Economics

Abstract:Investment-based asset pricing models typically predict a close link between a firm's stock return and its characteristics at any point in time. Yet, previous studies have primarily focused on the weaker prediction that this link holds on average, finding substantial empirical support. We show how to incorporate the time-series predictions in the estimation and testing of investment-based models using the generalized method of moments. We find that standard specifications of investment-based models with one physical capital input fail to match the time series properties of stock returns in the data, and discuss the implications of the findings for future research.

economics,business, finance
Cryptocurrency returns and consumption-based asset pricing

Injun Hwang,Ji Ho Kwon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2024.2358214

IF: 1.916

2024-05-29

Applied Economics

Abstract:This paper examines whether the cross-section of cryptocurrency returns is captured by risk factors based on consumption-based asset pricing. It is an imperative task for financial economists to find the fundamental risk behind characteristic-based cryptocurrency factors in order to economically understand cryptocurrency. To address the data availability issue in the analysis of cryptocurrency, we employ mixed data sampling (MIDAS) regression to check the relation between the principal component analysis (PCA) factors in cryptocurrency returns and the factors in the consumption capital asset pricing models (CCAPMs) and intertemporal capital asset pricing models (ICAPMs). We establish significant links between them, which in turn implies that cryptocurrency returns are investors' compensation for bearing consumption risk, conditional consumption risk, and intertemporal consumption risk. This finding underscores that cryptocurrency returns are the manifestation of macroeconomic equilibrium derived from investors' utility maximization.

economics
Specification Test of International Asset Pricing Models

Xiaoyan Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.276495

2001-01-01

Abstract:The benchmark model for domestic asset pricing is the Sharpe-Lintner CAPM, which claims that the asset returns are determined by their covariances with the return on the (domestic) market portfolio. But since the late 1970's, the major developed countries have gradually rescinded capital controls and opened the domestic market to international investors. As the global risk factors become more influential, is the local benchmark the right benchmark for asset pricing? This study tries to answer this question by evaluating and comparing several domestic and international asset pricing models. The set of models includes the Sharpe-Lintner CAPM, the International single-beta CAPM (with and without exchange risk), the Fama-French three-factor model (1993), and the International Fama-French multi-factor model (1998). These models are tested on several common sets of assets, which are comprised of size and B/M portfolios both within and across individual countries. (When the investors are constrained to the local market or a fund manager wants to construct a country fund, it is useful to know how local factors and global factors affect asset returns in the single national market. But if the investors have access to foreign markets or the fund manager wants to diversify globally, it is more relevant to price portfolios from different countries.) I use the Hansen-Jagannathan (1997) distance measure (hereafter HJ-distance) to test and compare various models. In addition, this article explores the relation between the Fama-French empirical factors and the business cycle variables, and how exchange risks affect individual portfolio returns. The asset pricing models are mainly required to price the B/M spread in returns, because the size effect is absent from all countries. The asset pricing test results show that the models with constant risk prices fail to price the cross-sectional returns. By allowing the risk prices to fluctuate with business cycle variables, the local Fama-French factor models and the conditional international models are able to pass the HJ-distance test within US and UK. Since the business cycle variables are highly correlated across countries, it suggests the importance of common world risks in local asset pricing. The market integration hypothesis (with the uniform risk prices across countries) is not rejected in cross-country asset pricing, when risk prices are scaled by global industrial production. The conditioning business cycle variables greatly improve the performance of each model, and they are always significantly priced (together with the global market risk when cross-country). Both the value premiums as in Fama and French (1993, 1998) and the exchange risks are priced in unconditional models. However, these factors either are never priced or lose their significance in the presence of industrial production.
Estimating and Testing Long-Run Risk Models: International Evidence

Andras Fulop,Junye Li,Hening Liu,Cheng Yan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3857366

2021-01-01

Abstract:We estimate and test long-run risk models using international macroeconomic and financial data. The benchmark model features a representative agent who has recursive preferences with a time preference shock, a persistent component in expected consumption growth, and stochastic volatility in fundamentals characterized by an autoregressive Gamma process. We construct a comprehensive dataset with quarterly frequency in the post-war period for ten developed countries and employ an efficient likelihood-based Bayesian method that exploits up-to-date sequential Monte Carlo methods to make full econometric inference. Our estimation provides international evidence in support of long-run risks, time-varying preference shocks, and countercyclicality of the stochastic discount factor.
Long-Run Asset Returns

David Chambers,Elroy Dimson,Antti Ilmanen,Paul Rintamäki

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-082123-105515

IF: 2.741

2024-11-07

Annual Review of Financial Economics

Abstract:The literature on long-run asset returns has continued to grow steadily, particularly since the start of the new millennium. We survey this expanding body of evidence on historical return premia across the major asset classes—stocks, bonds, and real assets—over the very long run. In addition, we discuss the benefits and pitfalls of these long-run data sets and make suggestions on best practice in compiling and using such data. We report the magnitude of these risk premia over the current and previous two centuries, and we compare estimates from alternative data compilers. We conclude by proposing some promising directions for future research.

economics,business, finance
Return Ambiguity, Portfolio Choice, and Asset Pricing

Yu Liu,Hao Wang,Lihong Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3076606

2017-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:We formulate a tractable continuous-time rational expectations model in which the agent is ambiguity averse and would like to robustify asset return specification. Ambiguity affects the portfolio rule and asset pricing both individually and collectively with risk. Independently existing ambiguity premium helps to explain why investors appear to underinvest in risky assets and do not exploit the asymptotic arbitrage opportunity emerged from trading inertia where return volatility (risk) is nearly zero (Campbell and Cochrane, 1999). Calibration of our Lucas-style model to the annual and quarterly U.S. asset prices and consumption data yields a relative risk aversion coefficient of five, and attributes 23%, 41%, and 36% of the equity premium to risk, ambiguity, and their interactions, respectively.
Regime Shifts in a Long-run Risks Model of U.S. Stock and Treasury Bond Markets

Kai Li,Chenjie Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4144386

2022-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:We study the joint determinants of stock and bond returns in a long-run risks model framework with regime shifts in consumption and inflation dynamics. In particular, the means, volatilities, and the correlation structure between consumption growth and inflation are regime-dependent. This general equilibrium framework can not only generate sign-switching stock-bond correlations and bond risk premium, but also quantitatively reproduce various other salient empirical features in stock and bond markets, including time-varying equity and bond return premia, regime shifts in real and nominal yield curves, the violation of the expectations hypothesis of bond returns. Our model shows that the term structure of interest rates and stock-bond correlation are intimately related to business cycles, while long-run risks play a more important role in accounting for high equity premium than do business cycle risks.
Are survey stock price forecasts anchored by fundamental forecasts? A long-run perspective

Pei Kuang,Li Tang,Renbin Zhang,Tongbin Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-024-01597-2

2024-07-15

Economic Theory

Abstract:This paper firstly shows that a wide range of asset pricing models, including full information and Bayesian rational expectations models, typically imply that agents use the long-run cointegration relationship between stock prices and fundamentals to forecast future stock prices. However, using several widely used survey forecast datasets, we provide robust new evidence that survey forecasts of aggregate stock price indices are not cointegrated with forecasts of fundamentals (aggregate consumption, dividend, and output), both at the consensus and individual level. We argue that it is crucial to relax investors' common knowledge of the equilibrium pricing function to reconcile this finding.

economics

The Long and the Short of Asset Prices: Using Long Run Consumption-Return Correlations to Test Asset Pricing Models

Using Long-Run Consumption-Return Correlations to Test Asset Pricing Models

Bank credit, consumption risk, and the cross-section of expected returns

Asset Return Predictability in A Heterogeneous Agent Equilibrium Model

THE SPIRIT OF CAPITALISM, NON-EXPECTED UTILITY AND ASSET PRICING

On Measuring the Economic Significance of Asset Return Predictability

Reference-dependent asset pricing with a stochastic consumption-dividend ratio

Regime Shifts in a Long-Run Risks Model of Stock and Treasury Bond Markets

New Test of Asset Pricing Models in China

Price and Payoff Autocorrelations in a Multi-Period Consumption-Based Asset Pricing Model

Estimating Expected Asset Returns with the Present Value Model of Consumption and Fed Forecasts

Consumption Strikes Back? Measuring Long-Run Risk

Accounting for Human Capital and Weak Identification in Evaluating the Epstein-Zin-Weil Non-Expected Utility Model of Asset Pricing

Estimating and testing investment-based asset pricing models

Cryptocurrency returns and consumption-based asset pricing

Specification Test of International Asset Pricing Models

Estimating and Testing Long-Run Risk Models: International Evidence

Long-Run Asset Returns

Return Ambiguity, Portfolio Choice, and Asset Pricing

Regime Shifts in a Long-run Risks Model of U.S. Stock and Treasury Bond Markets

Are survey stock price forecasts anchored by fundamental forecasts? A long-run perspective