Studies on the Historical Relations Between Xin Qing Nian and Jia Yin

Yang Hu

2002-01-01

Abstract:There are close historical relations between Xin Qing Nian, which was founded on 15 September 1915 and Jia Yin, reflected in these aspects:editor in chief, contributors, purpose of the Journal, columns and its style etc. Exploration to these relations is useful to further understand the formation and evolution of the May Fourth and New Cultural Movement.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Beyond the Jinwenand the Transformation from Classics to Historiography in Modern China

Kai Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2018.08.201

2019-01-01

Abstract:In the Qing Dynasty, the dispute between Jinwenand Guwen was a part of the disputes of Sinology between Neo-Confucianism, and the dispute evolved into a pivot of political and academic transformation in the late Qing and early Republic of China.With a view to reforming the ritual system by returning to the ancient political system, the movement which reexamine Chinese studies from disciplinary perspectives and discussed ancient history focused on differentiating and analyzing classics documents in order to eliminate the rationality of the political and educational system in Confucian ethics and rites.In the modern time, the New Culture generation of scholars promoted the historiography of classics.However, it is necessary to further probe into the academic division within traditional Chinese scholarship, and to study how the academic methods, issues and ideas inherited by scholars of different schools were developed and transcended by scholars of the Republic of China, leading to a pluralistic path in response to the integration of Chinese and western civilizations.In the 1930s, the historiography of classics had become a foregone conclusion.How to transcend the dispute of Jinwen and Guwen and deal with the ideas, methods and materials of classics in the way of history became the focus of the academic circle, thus opening a new round of controversy between Jinwen and Guwen.Scholars such as Qian Xuantong, Gu Jiegang and Meng Wentong called it ″Beyond the Jinwen″, and this transcendence and transformation became the starting point for scholars to practice new academic studies.In the academic circle of the Republic of China, there were different ways to inherit and surpass traditional Confucian classics.In the historical concept of the Guwen, the Six Classics were regarded as the ancient political documents, and the ancient history was separated from the spirit of Confucianism.The New Culture generation of scholars aimed to construct a course of internal cultural evolution course by means of historiography so as to change the study of classics into historiography, and construct the framework of Chinese cultural history without being limited by the Confucian re-creation of Chinese standard culture.The scholar Hu Shi put forward the idea of ″returning to Liao Ping″ to review the rationality of Liao Ping's division of Jinwen and Guwen by the system of rites.The scholar Qian Mu traced the academic evolution of Qin and Han Dynasties by historical facts, solved the dispute between Jinwen and Guwen, and was opposed to forced similarities and differences in the classics.Qian Xuantong and Gu Jiegang took a perspective of explicatory and analytical study, further historicized the issue of Jinwenand Guwen, and advocated going beyond the dispute over Jinwenand Guwen.Gu Jiegang advocated that Beyond the Jinwenshould absorb the criticism of Neo-Confucianism and the textual research of Sinology, so as to get rid of the old and bring forth the new, and clarify the evolution of Chinese history and culture.Based on Jinwen, Meng Wentong and Li Yuancheng emphasized the dynamic interaction of Classics, institution, and historical facts, and examine the sciences from a Chinese-studies perspective.They attempted to carry forward the New Confucianism of Qin and Han Dynasties to establish the core values of Chinese civilization and construct the dynamic relationship between Confucianism and historical evolution.They started the Confucianism-oriented historiography in the modern academic context.By examining the historical context in which various schools of thought have transcended the debate between Jinwenand Guwen, and by integrating methods and objectives, we can not only examine the complex connotation of the transformation of modern classics and history, but also reflect on and enrich the methods and significance of current historical studies, in order to turn historical studies into the source of the subjectivity of civilization.
Dispute of ″Jinwen″ and ″Guwen″ and Orientation of Confucianism under the Background of ″National Calamity″

Zhang Kai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.2012.08.051

2013-01-01

Abstract:In the Late Qing and the Republic of China,scholars had developed different paths in transforming traditional academics and bridging Sino-Western and old-new in the context of the evolution of Classical Studies and Historiography.Two distinct schools of Confucianism came into being in the Republic of China: one was the historical ″Guwen″ represented by Zhang Taiyan and his students,the other was the philosophic Jinwen represented by Liaoping and his students.With the aggravation of the National Calamity in the 1930s and revival of Confucianism,it was a common practice to promote Chinese culture and national spirits.Thus the transformation and practice of Confucianism became the focus in the discussion between the two different schools.During the dispute Meng Wentong and Li Yuancheng,Liao Ping's students,argued with Zhang Taiyan and Huang Kan constantly about sinology and Neo-Confucianism,″Jinwen″ and ″Guwen,″ and ″Classical Studies″ and ″Historiography″ to clarify the origin and development of Confucian philosophy. After a careful study of Qing's academic history and looking into the relations between Dai Zhen's philosophy and Xun Zi,Zhang Taiyan emphasized the unique significance of Dai Zhen in Qing's Academic history.On the contrary,Meng Wentong and Li Yuancheng resorted to traditional sinology and Confucian theories to question the construction of Dai Zhen's theory.Based on the examination of Examine Goodness,Li Yuancheng criticized Dai Zhen's doctrine of Ethics,Desire and Goodness as a misunderstanding of Mencius.Based on Guwen and centreing around the separation of Confucianism and Buddhism,Zhang Taiyan stressed the reliability of the historical account of the Six Classics to respond to the Skeptical School and illustrated the ideological and cultural tradition of China in the past two thousand years.Li Yuancheng had developed Liao Ping's theory and discussed with Zhang Taiyan the Rites and Spring and Autumn aiming to link ″Jinwen″ and ″Guwen″ and to reiterate the Great Righteousness of Spring and Autumn.Meng Wentong,through his study of the development of Confucian philosophy in Zhou dynasty,Qin dynasty and the two Han dynasties,attempted to find the succession of Confucianism and Mencius's thoughts,to analyze the philosophy of ″humanity and destiny,″ to interpret the controversies over Mencius and Xun Zi,to clarify the origin of sinology,and to challenge Cheng Zhu Confucian Orthodoxy.In short,Liao Ping's students had constructed a Confucian system based on the ″Goodness″ of Mencius,theoretically paving the way for for Jinwen and Confucian historiography. The school of Zhang Taiyan-Huang Kan purported to explore the development of national cultures,focused on the language and history,and advocated the cultivation of mind and behavior.Thus,it had associated moral ethics with political and social pragmaticism and had started the practical academics of Classical Studies and Historiography.In contrast,Liao Ping's students emphasized on constructing an dynamic interaction between the meanings of Classics,institution,and historical facts,carrying forward the ″New Confucianism of Qin and Han,″ and elucidating the revolutionary spirit of Jinwen and system design.Dispute of ″Jinwen″ and ″Guwen″ manifested the core difference of the academic interests between the schools of Zhang Taiyan-Huang Kan and Liao Ping's students.A clarification of their differences and disputes is of importance in interpreting the diversification of modern Confucianism and providing intellectual resources for the building of a nation-state or a civilization-state.
The Disputes Between Guwen Classics and Jinwen Classics:Liao Ping and Liu Shipei in Sichuan Academy of Traditional Chinese Learning

张凯

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-0766.2009.02.002

2009-01-01

Abstract:Connected to the modern knowledge formation and institutional changes in the late Qing period, the revival of the Guwen Classics and the subsequent disputes between Guwen Classics and Jinwen Classics have always been academic focuses. Since the late Qing dynasty, ”Shu Learning” as an important school of Jinwen Classics, has become a center of the Chinese traditional learning. ”Sichuan Academy of Traditional Chinese Learning”, established at the beginning of the Republic of China and gathering together many scholars, witnessed the disputes between Liao Ping and Liu Shipei, the cultural phenomenon in modern Chinese academic field. We believe that the examination and review of the event is helpful to depict the tendency of Shu Learning and the change of Liu Shipei's research, to outline the transformation of the Jinwen-Guwen Classics at the beginning of the Republic of China.
The Collection of Roots and the Reconstruction of Modern East Zhejiang Scholarship Chinese Full Text

张凯

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-5636.2023.01.007

2023-01-01

Abstract:In modern times,while Western learnings were introduced into China,Confucian classics became historiography.The East Zhejiang scholarship integrated the classics with the institution,which made it an important site for modern scholars to communicate between the old（China） and the new（West）,and build the new academic system.Liu Xianxin regarded the East Zhejiang scholarship his principal learning.He compiled The Collection of Roots（Xianhe Lu） many times,and constructed an academic genealogy of the East Zhejiang scholarship which perceived the Wuzhou historiography as the surface and Yaojiang Neo-Confucianism as the core.Moreover,Liu Xianxin explored the academic origin of literary and historical collation of the East Zhejiang School in the way of "knowing the categories and understanding the general system",and tried to integrate the study of life with the study of classics and history,in order to achieve the modern transformation of Chinese scholarship.The paper probes the sources and purposes of the original meaning and theme of Xianhe Lu,and hopes to show that the modern East Zhejiang School had been constantly shaped in the historical context and academic network.In addition,the paper also tends to provide some thoughts on how to clarify the changes of modern scholarship and analyze the transformation of Chinese civilization.
The Xueheng School (), Babbitt’s New Humanism, and the May Fourth Movement ()

Yi LI,Qian XIAOYU

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/cul012021.0005

2021-01-01

Cultura

Abstract:Abstract: In "The Xueheng School (), Babbitt’s New Humanism, and the May Fourth Movement ()" Li Yi discusses modern Chinese literary history. On the one hand, it is known that scholars have been discussing key figures of the May Fourth Movement by positioning the Xueheng School to the opposite side of the former. Hence in scholarship and criticism the location of the Xueheng School as a restoration group of feudalism resulted in understanding the School as hindering the development of modern culture. However, since the 1990s the Xueheng School inspired interest in the concept of restoring ancient Chinese thought. Some scholars even repeat the ideas of the Xueheng School and regard the efforts of Xueheng scholars as overall and profound cultural pursuits which would diminish some of the extreme ideas of the May Fourth Movement. Li argues that neither of the two views on the Xueheng School are accurate and discusses the Xueheng School’s achievements in view of Irving Babbitt’s idea of "New Humanism."
How to write Chinese history in the twenty-first century: The impact of the “New Qing History” studies and Chinese responses

Ding Yizhuang,Mark Elliott

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00094633.2018.1466565

2018-01-02

Chinese Studies in History

Abstract:This article is a result of the collaboration of two Qing historians, one from China and the other from the US. Having exchanged ideas, the two reached an agreement on the rise of New Qing History over the past two decades. The article breaks it down in three parts: (i) Analysis of the intellectual background of New Qing History; (ii) Discussion of several key questions raised by New Qing History and analysis of how and why they become controversial in historical communities in China; and (iii) Discussion of the significance of New Qing History from the perspective of global history on both methodological and theoretical levels. The authors believe that it is imperative for Chinese scholars, not only the Qing historians, to take stock of the issues raised by New Qing History. These issues reflect concerns of the historical communities both in and outside China and have far-reaching influences and implications across many fields of history in the twenty-first century.

English Else
On Causes and Nature of the Making of the May 4~(th) Neo-cultural Movement: An Observation from the Perspective of Sociopsychology

LUAN Mei-jian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-2794.2007.03.005

2007-01-01

Abstract:People have habitually explained the origin and nature of the May 4th Neo-cultural Movement in terms of "revolution" and "enlightenment".However,the social sentiments typical of China after World War I are actually the catalyst for the outbreak of this movement.Based on this opinion,this paper makes a new analysis of the literary evolution and settings in the ten-year period of the May 4th new literature.
The Construction of New Poetry’s Ethics during the May Fourth Movement and the Writing of Modern Chinese Poetry

Nie Zhenzhao

2013-01-01

Abstract:There are three key elements of the ethics of Chinese New Poetry during the May Fourth movement:baihua(the vernacular language),free verse and realistic representation,which together form the foundation of common themes and styles that feature in the development of modern Chinese poetry.The ethics of New Poetry is built upon the premise of using the vernacular in poetic composition with a focus on the reception of the concept of New Poetry and on the recognition of its literary style.The dispute of "Vernacular Chinese VS Classical Chinese" in poetry writing,on the one hand,reflects modern intellectuals’ refusal to adhere to traditional ethics in literary writing,and on the other,paves the path for the ethical transformation of modern Chinese literary creation.Hu Shih’s experiments of vernacular poetry in theory and practice contributed to the formation of New Poetry with the vernacular as a literary medium and as such,urged the transformation in literary style of modern Chinese literature in the May Forth era.Hu Shih’s poetry,as representative of the trend of times,is accordance with the development of modern Chinese poetry. With more followers joining in the group of New Poetry writing,the ethics of Chinese New Poetry is gradually accepted,complemented and finally established.
The Studies of the Great Series of the Chinese New Literature and Literary Orientation of May Fourth Movement Writers

Cai Chang-qing

Abstract:The Studies of the Great Series of the Chinese New Literature is the joint work of new literature authority and modern media.It is not only a works collection,but also has features of literary history.The Great Series influences literary orientation of May Fourth Movement authors in the following three aspects: editorial staff;the evaluation of modern writers and their works;the number of works selected.Because compiling time of The Great Series was very close to the New Literature,the compilers found it very difficult to eliminate personal factors when they were compiling works and evaluating writers and works.With the time passing by,The Great Series will face more tests and challenges in terms of the literary orientation of May Fourth Movement authors.

History,Computer Science
Scholarly periodicals and the research and exchange of world literature

Zhenzhao Nie

2009-01-01

Abstract:Periodicals appeared in China as a product of the influence of the Western scholarship. The first Chinese magazine Cha Shi Su Mei Yue Tong Ji Zhuan (Mundane Life Monthly) was inaugurated by British clergymen in Malay in 1815 and the first literary periodicals in China are Xin Xiao Shuo (New Fiction), Xiu Xiang Xiao Shuo (Illustrated Novels), Yue Yue Xiao Shuo (Novels Monthly), and Xiao Shuo, Lin (Forest of Novels), all appearing in the late Qing Dynasty. Periodicals serve as an important platform for publication and exchange and thus have a vital impact on the diffusion and influence of academic fruits. As regards China's literary study, scholarly journals have been playing an active role in the research and academic exchange ever since the New Literature Movement, featured essentially by the importation of foreign literature. Nowadays, the development of Chinese scholarly journals still lags behind compared with the outside world. Efforts must be made in the professionalization, optimalization and internationalization of the scholarly journals.
Some Issues on Cultural Research

郭建宁

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12120/bjutskxb20030161

2003-01-01

Abstract:Since the May Fourth Movement in 1919, the word has been a glamorous term in Chinese society, and the issues related to the culture have been the frontier topics attracting the Chinese academia. This article focuses on the analysis and comment on the contemporary Chinese cultural evolutionism and relativism, cultural radicalism and conservatism, and cultural globalism and nationalism. It is believed that strengthening our study on the important theoretical issues in the cultural construction has a crucial significance for establishing a new socialist Chinese culture containing both the spirit of the times and the excellent Chinese traditions, and having our feet planted in our own country while keeping the whole world in view.
A Critical Study of the History of the Different Editions of Sheng Dashi's Jingni Ji

Xin Deyong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16319/j.cnki.0452-7402.2006.02.010

2006-01-01

Abstract:The Qing work, Sheng Dashi's Jingni Ji, is the most systematic historical source treating the Jiaqing 18 Tianli Sect's anti-Qing uprising, and it has important historical value. However, because few editions are extant, scholars have long been uncertain about the origins and sequence of various editions. The author, on the basis of two early wood-block editions of the work in his collection, has undertaken a comparison of these with the photolithograph Shanghai Shudian edition and analyses the transmission of the various editions, so that the work can better serve scholars.
Walking Between the Chinese and Western Cultures as well as the Old and New: Studies of the Teaching of Chinese Around the May Fourth Movement in Tsinghua College

Ouyang Junxi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13613/j.cnki.qhdz.002190

2013-01-01

Abstract:Tsinghua College devoted great attention to the teaching of western culture while looked down on the teaching of Chinese before the May Fourth Movement.What's more,it boycotted the New Literature in the teaching of Chinese.The reform of the teaching of Chinese focused on teaching method but not contents,which showed a conservative stand.After the May Fourth Movement,Tsinghua College began to lay equal stress on western culture courses and Chinese culture courses.Its attitude to the New Literature also changed from repulsion to assimilation even acceptance.The guiding ideology of the reform of the teaching of Chinese changed from reform for use to reform for culture.Being neither running after the New Literature nor sticking to old ways,Tsinghua College walked between the Chinese and Western cultures as well as the old and new,which led to a new road of fusing Chinese and Western cultures.The reform of the teaching of Chinese around the May Fourth Movement showed a unique cultural and educational idea differentiated from that of the new culture advocates.
The May Fourth Intelligentsia:Center and Periphery——A Case Study of Reading La Jeunesse and the New Culture Movement

Zhang Qing

2010-01-01

Abstract:"Ever since the May Fourth Movement" has been a settled narrative pattern for a long time;the trope of "reading La Jeunesse and participating in the May Fourth Movement," as constructed by various "memoirs," also reflects the influence of "May Fourth." If we locate specific reading experiences within a broader field of view by asking how the New Culture Movement was "read," we may get different perspectives on this problem.Through looking at individual cases,including recent graduates and students still in school,we find that individuals in different regions with different identities had different "readings" of La Jeunesse and the New Culture Movement.This demonstrates the variety of the New Culture Movement and the diversity of Chinese society.Additionally,distinguishing between "center" and "periphery" can help later generations to better understand the New Culture Movement’s mechanisms of "influence." The "center" permeated into the "periphery," and at the same time the "periphery" identified with the "center."
An ExpIoration on Motivations of Qian Xuantong’s IdeoIogicaI Change during the Period of the New Youth

Wei NI

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-2338.2015.04.005

2015-01-01

Abstract:Qian Xuantong changed his ideological position from original ethnic chauvinism to radical anti-traditionalism when he joined the New Youth in 1907 .Through an exploration on Qian’s diaries, correspondences and published articles during this peri-od, it can be found that there were three motivations which resulted in his move towards the radical anti-traditionalism, namely his admiration for the sophisticated text research methods of the new text Confucianism, the revival of his enthusiasm for anar-chism, and his frequent exchange of ideas with Lu Xun.As the ideological disputes among the New Youth colleagues had been increasingly brought into open, especially after the May Fourth Movement had placed the political revolution on agenda, Qian gradually became anxious about the upcoming destructive effects of the revolution and moved again to a more conservative doc-trine of being self-responsible and self-interest.The capriciousness of Qian’s ideological position reveals the rootlessness of the i-dea and the absence of conviction, which is actually the typical spiritual characteristic of some sort of modern Chinese intellectuals.
Evolution of Editorial Ideology, Style and Content in The Ladies Journal During the May Fourth Movement Period

Z. Yanlin

Abstract:The Ladies' Journal was a platform for progressive intellectuals to discuss women's issues during the May Fourth Movement period. This article uses content pertaining to women's liberation in the original publication to analyze the editorial ideology and characteristics from an editorial perspective. It also summarizes the evolution of the women's liberation thoughts, analyzing the role of The Ladies' Journal in its publication. From a gender perspective,it also makes separate analysis on the gender differences of editors, writers and readers. Findings reveal that the women's liberation thoughts in the Ladies Journal was built and developed by editors, writers and readers altogether,and being transmitted from men to women. The discussion of women's issues in the Journal facilitated the forming of women's liberation thoughts and the expansion of the women's liberation roads, promoting the liberation process of Chinese women.

History,Sociology
Anthology of Philosophical and Cultural Issues

Yijie Tang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1869-5

2016-01-01

Abstract:This book collects sixteen theses written by Professor Tang Yijie, one of the most prominent scholars of traditional Chinese philosophy. He argues that a general understanding of traditional Chinese philosophy can be achieved by a concise elaboration of its truth, goodness and beauty. He also asserts that goodness and beauty in Chinese philosophy, combined with the integration of man and heaven, knowledge and practice, scenery and feeling, reflect a pursuit of an ideal goal in traditional Chinese philosophy characterized by the thought mode uniting man and nature. He also discusses the anti-traditionalism of the May Fourth Movement, explaining that the true value of “sagacity theory” in traditional Chinese philosophy, especially in Neo-Confucianism in the Song and Ming dynasties, lies in its insights into universal life. In addition, he stresses that existing ideas, issues, terminologies, concepts, and logic of Chinese philosophical thought were shaped by Western philosophy. It is necessary to be alienated from traditional status for the creation of a viable “Chinese philosophy.” “Modern Chinese philosophy” in the 1930s and 1940s was comprised of scholarly work that characteristically continued rather than followed the traditional discourse of Chinese philosophy. That is to say, in the process of studying and adapting Western philosophy, Chinese philosophers transformed Chinese philosophy from traditional to modern. In Chapter 13, he puts forward the idea of a “New Axial Age.” He emphasizes that the rejuvenation of Chinese culture we endeavor to pursue has to be deeply rooted in our mainstream culture with universal values incorporating cultures of other nations, especially the cultural essence of the West.
Moving Beyond “Sinicization” and “Manchu Characteristics”: Can Research on Qing History Take a Third Path?

Yang Nianqun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10971467.2016.1215108

2016-01-02

Contemporary Chinese Thought

Abstract:Yang proposes to marry the many insights procured by New Qing History to the idea of “Hua-ization,” the alternative to the sinicization thesis, by internalizing the multidirectional blending of ethnic communities. This proposed third path would combine and integrate valuable insights from both the old Qing history and New Qing History schools.

English Else
Wholeness and individuality: Revisiting the New Culture Movement, as symbolized by May Fourth

Luo Zhitian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00094633.2019.1654802

2019-10-02

Chinese Studies in History

Abstract:The May Fourth New Culture Movement was a "convergent historical movement," as well as a movement with a central purport and an intrinsic wholeness. The image of a homogeneous May Fourth formed unintentionally, and was also constructed by contemporaries and later generations. By examining the connections between the 1911 Revolution and the New Culture Movement from a more macroscopic perspective, exploring whether the latter was in fact a response to external impact or a self-awakening, observing how the debate over new versus old in the early Republican era developed to the point of a "culture" war, how the two-sided efforts for radical reforms reconciled destruction and construction, the interaction between the student movement and the New Culture Movement, and other aspects, thus examining the legacy of the New Culture Movement via perceptions in the post–May Fourth era, we can see that May Fourth has become a symbol of the New Culture Movement.

Studies on the Historical Relations Between Xin Qing Nian and Jia Yin

Beyond the Jinwenand the Transformation from Classics to Historiography in Modern China

Dispute of ″Jinwen″ and ″Guwen″ and Orientation of Confucianism under the Background of ″National Calamity″

The Disputes Between Guwen Classics and Jinwen Classics:Liao Ping and Liu Shipei in Sichuan Academy of Traditional Chinese Learning

The Collection of Roots and the Reconstruction of Modern East Zhejiang Scholarship Chinese Full Text

The Xueheng School (), Babbitt’s New Humanism, and the May Fourth Movement ()

How to write Chinese history in the twenty-first century: The impact of the “New Qing History” studies and Chinese responses

On Causes and Nature of the Making of the May 4~(th) Neo-cultural Movement: An Observation from the Perspective of Sociopsychology

The Construction of New Poetry’s Ethics during the May Fourth Movement and the Writing of Modern Chinese Poetry

The Studies of the Great Series of the Chinese New Literature and Literary Orientation of May Fourth Movement Writers

Scholarly periodicals and the research and exchange of world literature

Some Issues on Cultural Research

A Critical Study of the History of the Different Editions of Sheng Dashi's Jingni Ji

Walking Between the Chinese and Western Cultures as well as the Old and New: Studies of the Teaching of Chinese Around the May Fourth Movement in Tsinghua College

The May Fourth Intelligentsia:Center and Periphery——A Case Study of Reading La Jeunesse and the New Culture Movement

An ExpIoration on Motivations of Qian Xuantong’s IdeoIogicaI Change during the Period of the New Youth

Evolution of Editorial Ideology, Style and Content in The Ladies Journal During the May Fourth Movement Period

Anthology of Philosophical and Cultural Issues

Moving Beyond “Sinicization” and “Manchu Characteristics”: Can Research on Qing History Take a Third Path?

Wholeness and individuality: Revisiting the New Culture Movement, as symbolized by May Fourth