Abstract:Myopia, which is the result of the uncoordinated development of the eyeball, has become a major public health focus worldwide. Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) have been successfully used in modern corneal refractive surgery. However, there are still controversies about postoperative results of LASIK and SMILE. In this study, a three-dimensional finite element model of the cornea was constructed based on the elevation and pachymetry data of a female volunteer. Surgical parameters, magnitudes of myopic correction, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were varied. Furthermore, an iterative algorithm was applied to retrieve the free-stress state of the intact corneal model, LASIK model, and SMILE model. To better evaluate the differences between LASIK and SMILE procedures, the displacement and Von Mises stress on the anterior and posterior corneal surface along the x- and y -axes were analyzed. Results for the zero-pressure model showed larger displacement compared to the image-based corneal model, suggesting that the initial corneal pre-stress stiffens the response of the cornea, both in the intact cornea and under refractive surgery. In addition, the displacement on the corneal surface in LASIK (both zero-pressure and image-based model) was obviously higher than that of the SMILE model. In contrast, SMILE increased Von Mises stress in the corneal cap and reduced Von Mises stress in the residual stromal bed compared with the LASIK model. However, the maximum Von Mises stress in the SMILE model was still smaller than that of the LASIK model. Moreover, the displacement and Von Mises stress on the residual stromal bed increased linearly with IOP. Overall, LASIK and SMILE refractive surgery could change biomechanical behaviors of the cornea. Compared to LASIK refractive surgery, SMILE may present a lower risk of ectasia. Creating a corneal cap rather than a corneal flap may have an advantage in improving corneal biomechanical stability.

Research Advances in Effects of Femtosecond Laser and Mechanical Microkeratome for Creating Corneal Flap on Ocular Surface Changes

Changes of dry eye parameters after femtosecond laser and conventional LASIK

[Advances in Biomechanical Effects of Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery].

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond-Assisted Laser in Situ Keratomileusis in Patients with Deep Corneal Opacity: Case Series.

The Significance and Uses of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Corneal Refractive Surgery

Advantages and complications of femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis

Research Progress on Ocular Surface Changes after Fem- Tosecond Laser Small Incision Lenticule Extraction.

Application of Femtosecond Laser in Corneal Refractive Surgery

Femtosecond laser applications in corneal surgery

Comparison of corneal flap morphology using AS-OCT in LASIK with the WaveLight FS200 femtosecond laser versus a mechanical microkeratome.

Femtosecond laser-assisted corneal transplantation with a low-energy, liquid-interface system

Thin flap is the tendency of laser in situ keratomileusis

Comparison of corneaI biomechanicaI changes at earIy stage after femtosecond LASIK and microkeratome LASIK

Clinic study of corneal endothelial cell density of femtosecond laser assisted in situ keratomileusis

Comparison of corneal flap morphology in laser in situ keratomileusis with the WaveLight femtosecond laser versus the Moria mechanical microkeratome

Effects of Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction on Corneal Biomechanical Behavior: A Finite Element Analysis

Comparison on biomechanical stability between femtosecond laser assisted LASIK and LASEK with ocular response analyzer

Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome: a retrospective comparison of visual outcomes at 3 months

Application of Femtosecond Laser in Ocular Surgery.

Effects of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Multilayer Intrastromal Ablation in the Midperipheral Cornea

Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty for Keratoconus and Keratectasia