Development of the Archival Appraisal Theory
傅荣校,骆晓亦
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942x.2003.06.016
2003-01-01
Abstract:As a result of development of archives management in modern times, archival appraisal theory gradually shows all its o perational features in records and archives management. As time goes on, we can see that archival appraisal theory is clearly superior to any other archival theory. There are four phases in development of archival appraisal theory since early 20 th century. first phase is called traditional appraisal theory period before 1950's, including Ages System and Functional Theory. However, Hilar y Jenkinson, British classical archival scholar, exerted a tremendous influence over other archivists during this period. He published his famous book entitled A Manual for Archives Administration. Jenkinson opposed archives appraisal act in which archivists joined. Since 1950's, records are voluminous. Their growth in volume corresponded closely to increase in social activities. Both government and scholars foc used on reduction in quantity records. appraisal theory then entered second stage: period of Double Values theory presented by Theodore R. Schllenberg who has been called respectfully the father of appraisal theory in United In his landmark book, Modern Archives: Principle and Technique, he asserted that records had Primary Value and Secondary Value. former reflects importance of records to their original creator and latter reflects importance of records on subsequent researchers. Double Values theory became basic appraisal mechanism in Europe and United States. third phase was new functional appraisal theories, German Society Analysis and Functional Appraisal represented by Hans Booms, and New Macro-appraisal Acquisition Strategy which has been used by Canadian National Archives since 1989. Both of them claim that internal connection among agency 's activities ought to be noticed and that importance of governmental functions, programs, activities, and businesses should be analyzed and appraised. Canadian scholar Terry Cook concluded their commonality in thirteenth inte rnational archival congress. He held that appraisal methodology should be a context-based, provenance-centered framework rather than a content-based historical-documentalist one. fourth is electronic records appraisal theory, which suggests establishment of double fulcrum that is essential in appraising electronic records: one reflects content appraisal while other is technological appraisal . It app eared first in French Harold Naugler's Research Report, The Archival of Machine-readable Records: a RAMP Study with Guidelines. As a new focal point, technological analysis emphasizes appraisal of authenticity, integrality, usability and readability of electronic records. It also needs to kill viruses and check media of records. With development of appraisal theory, some features have appeared. First, principle of provenance and archives appraisal theory impact each other. Secondly, influences of traditional history studies on appraisal theories have faded since 1950's; Thirdly, appraisal criteria or guidelines show trends of usability and practicality. coloring of pragmatism is getting clear than ever before.