��国《绿色建筑评价标准》解析

袁镔,王大伟

2007-01-01

Abstract:本文在学习我国《绿色建筑评价标准》的基础上，结合国际上“绿色建筑评估体系”，从评价内容、指标体系、评价机制三个方面与我国的《绿色建筑评价标准》进行了比较。文章分析了我国《绿色建筑评价标准》的内容和特点及存在的问题。

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The Analyses of Chinese "Evaluation Standard for Green Building"

Yuan Bin,Wang Dawei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-9506.2007.04.005

2007-01-01

Abstract:This thesis compared China's"Evaluation standard for green building"with the international perfect evaluation system of green building,about the evaluation content,index system and evaluation mechanism.After analyzing the content and the characteristic of the"Evaluation standard for green building".this thesis points out the problem of"the evaluation".
A comparison on the evaluation standards of sustainable campus between China and America

Bifeng Zhu,Gebing Liu,Jing Feng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-03-2021-0095

IF: 4.12

2021-12-30

International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education

Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to make a comparative study on the latest version of green campus evaluation standard between China and America: Green Campus Evaluation Standard (GB/T51356-2019) and the sustainability tracking, assessment and rating system (STARS 2.2). The differences of evaluation methods and contents are analyzed and their respective characteristics and advantages are sorted out, so as to promote the development of sustainable campus evaluation standards. Design/methodology/approach The research mainly adopts the method of comparative study, which is carried out from three dimensions, namely, the related policies development of campus construction and world university sustainable rankings; the content of evaluation standards (including evaluation methods and evaluation categories and scores); the characteristics and current application of standards. Findings There are great differences between the evaluation standards of China and America in organization and participation mode, evaluation method and content. Public engagement, energy and campus engagement are the hot spots. Buildings, energy, food and dining and investment and finance will become the focus of sustainable campus in the future. Specific optimization strategies of key points, evaluation method and content and organization and participation mode of Chinese standard are put forward. Practical implications This paper clarifies the advantages and disadvantages of the current global sustainable campus, and provides the basis for the next stage of construction policy. At the same time, it is helpful for all countries, especially China, to formulate construction guidelines that not only meet their own actual needs but also conform to the trend of global sustainable campus development. Social implications The connotation of sustainable campus is enriched, and the evaluation standards of sustainable campus are improved. The development of sustainable campus is promoted, so as to realize the sustainable development goals. Originality/value This research expands the scope of the study to the whole campus, rather than just one aspect of campus buildings. It compares the evaluation standard of green campus in China with STARS in the USA, and no longer compares leadership in energy and environmental design for schools. It discusses the campus building’s energy conservation while paying attention to the campus green consciousness, green management and green planning. Based on the relevant data currently used by STARS in the global evaluation, this paper analyzes the hot spots and shortcomings of the current global sustainable campus construction and puts forward some optimization suggestions for China’s green campus evaluation system.

green & sustainable science & technology,education & educational research
A COMPARISON STUDY OF THE GREEN BUILDING EVALUATION CRITERIA IN ASIA

Yuanyuan Ji,Vincenzo Paolo,Tong Che

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13204/j.gyjz201502009

2015-01-01

Abstract:The purpose of this research is to contribute to a better understanding of the green building evaluation systems in Asian countries.Green building evaluation systems play an essential role in implementing the sustainable principles of the ecological construction.In this paper, it was made detailed description and comparison among seven mainstream green building assessment criteria, including HK-BEAM, CASBEE, GBCC, ESGB, EEWH, Green Mark and GBI.It was introduced the first grade framework indicators of the green building evaluation systems, evaluation tools and relevant policies for the development of green buildings in these countries.Finally it was also proposed suggestions on the green building evaluation system in China.
A comparative analysis of green building rating systems in China and the United States

Xianglin Li,Wei Feng,Wei Feng,Wei Feng,Xiaojing Liu,Yue Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104520

IF: 11.7

2023-06-01

Sustainable Cities and Society

Abstract:Several studies have compared green building rating systems (GBRSs) in China and the United States, Nonetheless, few studies included in-depth analysis on specific rating tools with project specific data validating green building technologies and actual performance. This study conducted a comprehensive data-driven comparison of the GBRSs of China and the United States. The goal was to understand the current status and further improve China's GBRS and promote green building technologies. The study first conducted thorough comparisons of GBRSs in China and the U.S. by selecting a series of distinct rating tools. Then, it analyzed each tool's development objectives, contents, and rating score settings. The comparison concludes the future development needs for China's GBRS. In addition to standard comparison, green building technologies applied in certified projects were also summarized. The results demonstrated that GBRSs in both China and the U.S. reflect well the technical paths to achieve green building sustainable development. By analyzing certified projects, it was also found that the incremental costs of green building technologies were controllable. Finally, based on the comparison and case analysis, the study provide a set of policy recommendations to further improve China's green building standards.

energy & fuels,construction & building technology,green & sustainable science & technology
A review of studies on green building assessment methods by comparative analysis

Yuanyuan Li,Xiaochen Chen,Xiaoyu Wang,Youquan Xu,Po-Han Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.04.076

IF: 7.201

2017-07-01

Energy and Buildings

Abstract:Green building assessment methods, which play an essential role in promoting the development of green buildings, have attracted much attention in recent years. Many studies have been conducted on the development of new assessment methods and improvement of existing ones through comparative analysis. However, there is no comprehensive study that explicitly explores these efforts. For this purpose, a systematic review of the existing literature on green building assessment methods through comparative analysis is carried out in this paper. The main contributing authors as well as represented countries and areas are investigated. The comparison rules, including the number of comparative assessment methods and high frequency assessment methods, as well as the current status of comparison topics are explored. Finally, some research opportunities are proposed for future development. The research results would serve as a useful reference for both industry practitioners and academics who are interested in the development of green building assessment methods.

energy & fuels,construction & building technology,engineering, civil
Analysis of the Instructive Ability of the Evaluation Criteria of the Ecological Residence in China——From The Technical Assessment Handbook for Ecological Residence of China to Green Building Evaluation Criteria

Huang Yixiang,Li Dexiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-739X.2006.10.034

2006-01-01

Abstract:Ever since the publication of The Technical Assessment Handbook for Ecological Residence of China, it was not only used as the evaluation criteria, but also used by producers as the guidelines in the design and construction of ecological residences. A new Green Building Evaluation Criteria was published in June 2006 and it will certainly play a leading role in guiding the development of ecological residences. Throughout the actual application of the "Handbook" in many ecological residential projects in the past few years, certain insufficiency was found in its instructive ability. Therefore, this paper will discuss these problems first and further compare them with the new Green Building Evaluation Criteria, analyzing the instructive ability of the new criteria.
From Green to Healthy Buildings: A Comparative Study of the USA and China

Xiaohuan Xie,Zhonghua Gou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24650-1_5

2020-01-01

Abstract:This paper presents an in-depth comparison of the items and detailed assessment criteria of US' WELL Building Standard System and China's T/ASC 02-2016 Assessment Standard for Healthy Buildings (ASHB). Classification and statistics are made on each item of the two standards separately to analyze their different emphases, different weights, and different quantitative criteria. It is obvious that the two systems are identical with what should be a healthy building. A healthy building should be human-oriented living and working environments where human's physiological and psychological needs are satisfied. However, they two systems show divergences on specific items and criteria, which are related to their social and construction practice. WELL is more performance-oriented, while ASHB is more experience-oriented. China ASHB could be improved from four aspects: Establish more performance criteria rather than one single measure; increase the demand for on-site inspection and testing; combine the concept of health into the consideration of whole life cycle of building design; and increase the impact of the standard on the post-occupancy stage of buildings.
A critical comparison of green building rating systems

Dat Tien Doan,Ali Ghaffarianhoseini,Nicola Naismith,Tongrui Zhang,Amirhosein Ghaffarianhoseini,John Tookey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.007

IF: 7.093

2017-10-01

Building and Environment

Abstract:Various green rating systems are established globally to evaluate the sustainability of construction projects. Their categories and criteria have been under constant updates to follow the sustainable trend of building development. This paper aims to develop a systematic review of the development of green rating systems. The specific objectives are: 1) discover how interest and research in green rating systems have developed; 2) identify the similarity, difference, strength and weakness of green rating systems; 3) examine whether they fully assess the projects in all aspects of sustainability. Specifically, LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design), BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Assessment Method), CASBEE (Comprehensive Assessment System for Building Environmental Efficiency) and Green Star NZ were analysed in this paper. The results indicate that BREEAM, LEED, and CASBEE have been utilized since late the 2000s while Green Star NZ is still in its earlier stages. 70% of the research papers focusing on BREEAM, LEED, CASBEE are developed geographically in the USA, Canada, the UK, China, and Australia. Although these four rating systems were initiated in different contexts with different standards, Indoor Environment Quality, Energy, and Material are core common categories for all. Environmental concerns are the main focus in New Construction manuals while Society is emphasized in Neighbourhood Development manuals. Currently, BREEAM has been the only tool which could assess all four sustainable factors. Further in-depth research is anticipated to focus more on economic and institutional factors to improve the capability of green rating systems for sustainability assessment purposes.

engineering, environmental,construction & building technology, civil
An Overview of Chinese Green Building Standards

Yong Geng,Huijuan Dong,Bing Xue,Jia Fu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1537

IF: 12.5

2012-05-01

Sustainable Development

Abstract:ABSTRACT With rapid urbanization and industrialization, China is now facing a great challenge in meeting the soaring demand for new buildings and the corresponding energy consumption. Under such circumstances, the setting of a national standard on green buildings would be an effective way to respond. In fact, China has made significant progress in developing national green building standards. But such progress is not explicitly released to the international societies. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to introduce such progress. China's green building efforts are first discussed in detail with the various provisions of the national indicator system. By conducting a comparison with other countries' green building standards, a critical analysis of such a national standard is presented. The comparison indicates benefits to be gained and challenges to be met, such as lack of indicators on responding climate change, lack of region‐specific indicators, lack of quantitative indicators, higher costs for receiving certification and lack of applying innovative green technologies. So, substantive revision is critically needed. The knowledge gained from Chinese efforts on green building indicators are valuable to both developed and developing nations seeking to implement sustainable development measures within their regulatory policies. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

green & sustainable science & technology,regional & urban planning,development studies
Green building evaluation system implementation

Zhikun Ding,Ze Fan,Vivian W.Y. Tam,Yu Bian,Shenghan Li,I.M. Chethana S. Illankoon,Sungkon Moon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.02.012

IF: 7.093

2018-04-01

Building and Environment

Abstract:The Green Building concept is very popular worldwide. The adverse impact of construction on the environment significantly promotes the development of the green building concept worldwide. Green buildings are generally termed as environmentally friendly buildings. Therefore, over the past several decades, there have been many green building rating tools developed by institutions to evaluate these buildings. However, a majority of the green buildings certified with these rating tools are assessed primarily on their design and construction. The life-cycle of a green building extends beyond these initial phases, with its full benefits becoming more apparent during the operational stages of the building. However, there is a clear lack of green building projects obtaining green certificates that evaluate the operational stages of the building. Therefore, this research aims to identify the barriers preventing the certification of green buildings in their operational stages. Initially, commonly used international green building rating tools were identified and analysed on the evaluation criteria. Following this analysis, Chinese standards on green building evaluation were also discussed in detail. Furthermore, a case study building with three-star certification for the operational stage was incorporated into the analysis. This case study building was analysed with the Chinese standards, namely Chinese evaluation standard green building (ESGB) 2014, along with other international standards such as the Leadership in Environmental and Energy Design Leadership (LEED), the Building Research Establishment's Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM), and Green Star. Structured interviews were also carried out to identify the barriers, while measures to overcome these barriers were also discussed. The inconsistency of government regulations, the inability of the market to protect developers' interests, and the inability to meet technical requirements were identified as the three main barriers.

engineering, environmental,construction & building technology, civil
Relativity Characteristics between Green Architecture and Urban Ecological Environment

Wang Dawei,Yuan Bin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-739X.2009.03.011

2009-01-01

Abstract:From such aspects as water resources,energy,atmosphere,building materials resources,as well as noise and vegetation,this article discusses in detail relativity characteristics between green buildings and the urban ecological environment,further defines the Green Architecture,expounds the system and complex of the urban ecological construction and management,points out the weak links of ecological construction and green buildings in China,and advocates green buildings evaluation adapting to local conditions.
Evaluation System for Green Building and Water Conservation

Hong-tao WANG,Feng-ting LI,Ran XU

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-4602.2007.02.027

2007-01-01

Abstract:The system and characteristics of Evaluation Standard for Green Building were introduced,and the water conservation requirements of this standard were analyzed in detail.Some other evaluation systems for green building and their requirements for water conservation in China and foreign countries were described.The difference of water conservation requirements in different countries from that of this national standard was compared.
Improving the Understanding of the Green Assessment System / LEED in Developing Countries : the Case of China

Nan Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.878.850

2014-01-01

Advanced Materials Research

Abstract:Several green assessment systems, such as LEED in North America, BREEAM in UK, CASBEE in Japan, GBTool in Canada have been discussed in this paper, especially focus on the similarities and differences. These systems could be used to evaluate the environmental impact of various construction projects, to set up the standard for related assessment as well. They have similar sustainable concerns: sustainable site selection, energy efficiency, water efficiency, sustainable material and resource, and indoor environment quality. However, each one put different ratio on these categories.A review in the state-of-the-act of the green assessment system has been done in this paper, and some important findings have been highlighted in tables. Consequently, some hotspot issues, such as why LEED is preferred in China, how to use it in a proper way, and what can we do with the still existed challenges are discussed.
Assessment System for Green Building from the Angle of Ecological Design——Taking the CASBEE, LEED and GOBAS As Example

Zhi-yong ZHANG,Yong JIANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-4764.2006.04.008

2006-01-01

Abstract:In this paper,first,three assessment systems for green building,namely the LEED(USA) and GOBAS(China) are compared with CASBEE(Japan) in respect of central concepts,mark of evaluation and result of assessment.It is expected that this research of assessment systems could be helpful to designers of architecture in different specialties.Secondly,in this paper these three assessment systems are analyzed from the position of design work.In the end,it is pointed out that to compile a design-oriented handbook for green building design is the new domain of the assessment system for green building.
A Constructive Critique of China's Green Architectural Design and Research

Song Yehao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-3959.2013.04.002

2013-01-01

Abstract:This article discusses green architectural design and research in China through three aspects.Firstly,it analyzes the adoption of overseas experiences on green architecture with a consideration of Chinese situation in advance.Secondly,the technique of adopting the appropriate technology is proposed.Thirdly,the potential research subjects of the post occupation measurement of green architecture in urban areas and field survey in rural areas are suggested.
Research on the Assessment System of Green Buildings in China

Chunyan Dong

2010-01-01

Abstract:This paper investigates the primary contents of such an assessment system with the lens of material flow analysis,and finally identifies five critical factors that a green building assessment system is expected to possess: the assessment system should be ( 1) carried out in all phases throughout the whole life cycle of buildings; ( 2) emphasize on different contents referring to building types; ( 3) consider regional differences in terms of climate,resource and environment; ( 4) treat a building with respect to life-cycle cost; and ( 5) be updated continuously. This paper is a summary of a pilot study,which attempts to build an assessment system for green building based on the current situation and the future direction of China.
A COMPARISON OF INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL SATISFACTION BETWEEN TWO GREEN BUILDINGS AND A CONVENTIONAL BUILDING IN CHINA

Zhonghua Gou,Stephen Siu-Yu Lau,Zhidong Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.7.2.89

2012-01-01

Journal of Green Building

Abstract:Green buildings can have a more significant impact on their occupant health and productivity through improving indoor environment quality. However, post-occupancy studies invariably pointed out that green buildings were not always more comfortable and productive than non-green buildings. The article presents a comparison study between three buildings in Shenzhen aiming to examine the actual performance of green buildings from occupant point of view. The two green buildings marked a higher satisfaction on the health and productivity perception. However, in-depth examinations on IEQs showed some weaknesses in the two green buildings. On the comfort and satisfaction with the indoor air and temperature, the two green buildings performed better in summer but worse in winter. One of the two green buildings had significantly more noise from different sources than the conventional building. The other green building was significantly less satisfactory on the lighting environment than the conventional building. Implications were discussed for the green building designs and operations.
Comparison of Construction Standards' Content and Depth Between China and Canada and Its Reference

LI Xiaodong,WANG Shuai,DENG Xiaomei

2008-01-01

Abstract:The paper introduces the contents and development of Canadian construction standards in the field of public works.Based on the Fit-up standards:Technical Reference Manual,the paper make a comparison of construction standards between China and Canada.The key points include relationship with the technical standards,approval governance and life cycle cost advanced.Meanwhile,also consider the desperation of building and the responsibility of workers as another main comparison point.Some suggestions are put forward in the end.
Green indicator system in life-cycle design of engineering structures

JIN Weiliang,WANG Zhujun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2018.03.015

2018-01-01

Abstract:The green design and green evaluation of engineering structures are two similar processes.Based on the theory of life-cycle design of sustainable engineering structures,the life-cycle design green indicator system of engineering structures was established,taking the similarities of structures' green evaluation systems from home and abroad as references.The green indicator system contains three indexes:the environment-oriented'environmental evaluation index',the human-oriented'user and social satisfaction index',and ecosystem-oriented'sustainable development index'.The traditional indicator system of life-cycle design is an extension to the current structural design method,while the green indicator system is a brand new one established beyond it,which represents the humanities concern and natural responsibilities of the structural life-cycle design theory.By analytic hierarchy process,classification and weighting analysis,detailed green indicators were proposed for the life-cycle design of building structures,so as to minimize the impacts of engineering activities on environment and ecosystem,and simultaneously maximize the benefits to relevant populations.The life-cycle design green indicator system of coastal highway bridges was constructed,considering the specific structural forms,purposes and environments.
Comparative Analysis on Building Energy Consumption at Home and Abrosd

张声远,杨秀,江亿

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-2355.2008.07.008

2008-01-01

Abstract:This paper firstly defines the data boundary for comparing building energy consumption,based on which international comparison on overall building energy consumption is conducted.And the comparative result indicates a lower building energy consumption level of China,compared with developed western countries. Throughout further comparative analysis on building energy consumption data split up by different energy end uses in buildings,it gets the conclusion that building energy consumption differs dramatically from the differ- ent strategies of indoor environment control and different modes of energy consuming.

���国《绿色建筑评价标准》解析

The Analyses of Chinese "Evaluation Standard for Green Building"

A comparison on the evaluation standards of sustainable campus between China and America

A COMPARISON STUDY OF THE GREEN BUILDING EVALUATION CRITERIA IN ASIA

A comparative analysis of green building rating systems in China and the United States

A review of studies on green building assessment methods by comparative analysis

Analysis of the Instructive Ability of the Evaluation Criteria of the Ecological Residence in China——From The Technical Assessment Handbook for Ecological Residence of China to Green Building Evaluation Criteria

From Green to Healthy Buildings: A Comparative Study of the USA and China

A critical comparison of green building rating systems

An Overview of Chinese Green Building Standards

Green building evaluation system implementation

Relativity Characteristics between Green Architecture and Urban Ecological Environment

Evaluation System for Green Building and Water Conservation

Improving the Understanding of the Green Assessment System / LEED in Developing Countries : the Case of China

Assessment System for Green Building from the Angle of Ecological Design——Taking the CASBEE, LEED and GOBAS As Example

A Constructive Critique of China's Green Architectural Design and Research

Research on the Assessment System of Green Buildings in China

A COMPARISON OF INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL SATISFACTION BETWEEN TWO GREEN BUILDINGS AND A CONVENTIONAL BUILDING IN CHINA

Comparison of Construction Standards' Content and Depth Between China and Canada and Its Reference

Green indicator system in life-cycle design of engineering structures

Comparative Analysis on Building Energy Consumption at Home and Abrosd

��国《绿色建筑评价标准》解析