Abstract:Objective: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a preventable cause of hospitalization-related morbidity and mortality. VTE prevention requires accurate risk stratification. Federal agencies mandated VTE risk assessment for all hospital admissions. We have shown that the widely used Caprini (30 risk factors) and Padua (11 risk factors) VTE risk-assessment models (RAMs) have limited predictive ability for VTE when used for all general hospital admissions. Here, we test whether combining the risk factors from all 23 available VTE RAMs improves VTE risk prediction. Methods: We analyzed data from the first hospitalizations of 1,282,014 surgical and non-surgical patients admitted to 1298 Veterans Affairs facilities nationwide between January 2016 and December 2021. We used logistic regression to predict VTE within 90 days of admission using risk factors from all 23 available VTE RAMs. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were used to quantify the predictive power of our models. The metrics were computed at two diagnostic thresholds that maximized (1) the value of sensitivity + specificity-1; and (2) PPV and were compared using McNemar's test. The Delong-Delong test was used to compare AUCs. Results: After excluding those with missing data, 1,185,633 patients (mean age, 66 years; 93% male; and 72% White) were analyzed, of whom 33,253 (2.8%) had a VTE (deep venous thrombosis [DVT], n = 19,218, 1.6%; pulmonary embolism [PE], n = 10,190, 0.9%; PE + DVT, n = 3845, 0.3%). Our composite RAM included 102 risk factors and improved prediction of VTE compared with the Caprini RAM risk factors (AUC composite model: 0.74; AUC Caprini risk-factor model: 0.63; P < .0001). When the sum of sensitivity and specificity-1 was maximized, the composite model demonstrated small improvements in sensitivity, specificity and PPV; NPV was high in both models. When PPV was maximized, the PPV of the composite model was improved but remained low. The nature of the relationship between NPV and PPV precluded any further gain in PPV by sacrificing NPV and sensitivity. Conclusions: Using a composite of 102 risk factors from all available VTE RAMs, we improved VTE prediction in a large, national cohort of >1 million general hospital admissions. However, neither model has a sensitivity or PPV that permits it to be a reliable predictor of VTE. We demonstrate the limits of currently available VTE risk prediction tools; no available RAM is ready for widespread use in the general hospital population.

A new risk assessment model of venous thromboembolism by considering fuzzy population

Comparing Different Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment Machine Learning Models in Chinese Patients

Ontology-based Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment Model Developing from Medical Records

Comparison of Machine Learning Models and Framingham Risk Score for the prediction of the presence and severity of Coronary Artery Diseases by using Gensini Score

Construction and validation of risk prediction models for pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients based on different machine learning methods

Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism in Diverse Populations Using Machine Learning and Structured Electronic Health Records

Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Venous Thromboembolism in Lung Cancer Patients Using Machine Learning

Venous thromboembolism risk assessment of surgical patients in Southwest China using real-world data: establishment and evaluation of an improved venous thromboembolism risk model

Development and Validation of an ICU-Venous Thromboembolism Prediction Model Using Machine Learning Approaches: A Multicenter Study

Improving Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Through Machine Learning Modelling of Irregularly Repeated Electronic Health Records

Machine learning-based prediction model of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis after stroke

Machine learning-based predictive models for patients with venous thromboembolism: A Systematic Review

Machine Learning to Dynamically Predict In-Hospital Venous Thromboembolism After Inguinal Hernia Surgery: Results From the CHAT-1 Study

Identification of key risk factors for venous thromboembolism in urological inpatients based on the Caprini scale and interpretable machine learning methods

Risk prediction models for deep venous thrombosis in patients with acute stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparison of different machine learning classification models for predicting deep vein thrombosis in lower extremity fractures

Development and validation of a novel model to predict pulmonary embolism in cardiology suspected patients: A 10-year retrospective analysis

Predicting the occurrence of venous thromboembolism: construction and verification of risk warning model

A composite risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism

Predicting Venous Thrombosis in Osteoarthritis Using a Machine Learning Algorithm: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Machine Learning Predicts Cancer-Associated Deep Vein Thrombosis Using Clinically Available Variables