Abstract:Background: ICU patients have a high incidence of VTE. The American College of Chest Physicians antithrombotic practice guidelines recommend assessing the risk of VTE in all ICU patients. Although several VTE risk assessment tools exist to evaluate the risk factors among hospitalized patients, there is no validated tool specifically for assessing the risk of VTE in ICU patients. Methods: A retrospective corhort study was conducted between June 2018 and October 2022. We obtained data from the electronic medical records of patients with a variety of diagnoses admitted to a mixed ICU. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the independent risk factors of VTE. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to analyse the predictive accuracy of different tools. Results: A total of 566 patients were included, and VTE occurred in 89 patients (15.7%), 62.9% was asymptomatic VTE. A prediction model (the ICU-VTE prediction model) was derived from the independent risk factors identified using multivariate analysis. The ICU-VTE prediction model included eight independent risk factors: history of VTE (3 points), immobilization ≥4 days (3 points), multiple trauma (3 points), age ≥70 years (2 points), platelet count >250 × 103/μL (2 points), central venous catheterization (1 point), invasive mechanical ventilation (1 point), and respiratory failure or heart failure (1 point). Patients with a score of 0-4 points had a low (1.81%) risk of VTE. Patients were at intermediate risk, scoring 5-6 points, and the overall incidence of VTE in the intermediate-risk category was 17.1% (odds ratio [OR], 11.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2-29.4). Those with a score ≥7 points had a high (44.1%) risk of VTE (OR, 42.6; 95% CI, 16.4-110.3). The area under the curve (AUC) of the ICU-VTE prediction model was 0.838, and the differences in the AUCs were statistically significant between the ICU-VTE prediction model and the other three tools (ICU-VTE score, Z = 3.723, P < 0.001; Caprini risk assessment model, Z = 6.212, P < 0.001; Padua prediction score, Z = 7.120, P < 0.001). Conclusions: We identified eight independent risk factors for acquired VTE among hospitalized patients in the ICU, deriving a new ICU-VTE risk assessment model. The model aims to predict asymptomatic VTE in ICU patients. The new model has higher predictive accuracy than the current tools. A prospective study is required for external validation of the tool and risk stratification in ICU patients.

Development and Validation of an ICU-Venous Thromboembolism Prediction Model Using Machine Learning Approaches: A Multicenter Study

A Risk Prediction Model for Efficient Intubation in the Emergency Department: A Five-Year Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

Prediction of Post-Stroke Urinary Tract Infection Risk in Immobile Patients Using Machine Learning: an Observational Cohort Study.

Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment at Admission: a Retrospective Study.

Prediction of Central Venous Catheter-Associated Deep Venous Thrombosis in Pediatric Critical Care Settings.

Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Venous Thromboembolism in Lung Cancer Patients Using Machine Learning

A Machine Learning Approach to Predict Deep Venous Thrombosis Among Hospitalized Patients

Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism in Diverse Populations Using Machine Learning and Structured Electronic Health Records

Construction and validation of risk prediction models for pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients based on different machine learning methods

Machine Learning Predicts Cancer-Associated Deep Vein Thrombosis Using Clinically Available Variables

A novel hierarchical machine learning model for hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism risk assessment among multiple-departments

Prediction of large vessel occlusion for ischaemic stroke by using the machine learning model random forests

Machine learning-based prediction of the post-thrombotic syndrome: Model development and validation study

MACHINE LEARNING FOR PREDICTING HEMODYNAMIC DETERIORATION OF PATIENTS WITH INTERMEDIATE-RISK PULMONARY EMBOLISM IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT.

Early prognosis prediction for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the intensive care unit: based on interpretable machine learning

Comparing Different Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment Machine Learning Models in Chinese Patients

Development of a Risk Assessment Tool for Venous Thromboembolism among Hospitalized Patients in the ICU

Development and Validation of a Risk Assessment Model for Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

Machine learning risk prediction model for bloodstream infections related to totally implantable venous access ports in patients with cancer

Prediction Models for Sepsis-Associated Thrombocytopenia Risk in Intensive Care Units Based on a Machine Learning Algorithm

The Use of Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Deep Vein Thrombosis in Rehabilitation Inpatients