In-vivo and ex-vivo parathyroid autofluorescence overlay imaging is equally feasible using two different wavelengths (785 nm vs. 805 nm)

M. Arikan,L. Hargitai,T. Binter,C. Scheuba,P. Riss
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpsurg.2024.101443
IF: 2.815
2024-01-31
Current Problems in Surgery
Abstract:Background The aim of this study was to compare the autofluorescence of parathyroid glands (PGs) in-vivo and ex-vivo using two near-infrared autofluorescence(NIRAF) overlay imaging devices with different wavelengths of 785 nm and 805 nm. Methods This prospective study included six patients(five[83.3%] female and one[16.7%] male) who had undergone thyroid and/or parathyroid surgery and in whom NIRAF imaging of at least one PG was performed using two EleVision IR(Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) devices with 785 nm and 805 nm excitation light with the same power of 3000mW in June 2023 in a tertiary referral care center. The PGs were first localized by the surgeon. Autofluorescence was subsequently imaged with both NIRAF overlay imaging devices. The distance, angle and automatic adjustment of infrared intensity(IR%) were documented using both NIRAF overlay imaging devices. Differences in autofluorescence patterns were noted. Results In total, 16 PGs were analyzed in surgeries of the thyroid glands(n=3; 50%) and in 3(50%) PG surgeries. The ideal distance for each measurement using either NIRAF overlay imaging device(wavelength 785 nm vs. 805 nm) was 10 cm with an angle of 90°. EleVision IR with a wavelength of 785nm and 805nm showed mean IR% values of 30.1±22.4(6-75) and 30.1±15.9(6-68). Stronger and homogeneous autofluorescence patterns of parathyroid adenoma were seen using the EleVision IR device with 805 nm compared to 785 nm wavelength. No other differences in autofluorescence were seen in-vivo or ex-vivo using either device. Conclusion NIRAF-based overlay imaging with a wavelength of 805 nm shows similar results in the localization of PGs as the device with 785 nm excitation light. Thus, it represents an equally feasible intraoperative tool for PGs.
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?