Frequency and classification of addenda in paediatric neuroradiological reports as part of quality assurance

S.S.B. Venkatakrishna,A. Ghosh,P. Sharma,M. Miranda-Schaeubinger,A.V. Prakash,L. Addisu,R.W. Sze,S. Andronikou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2023.12.025
IF: 3.389
2024-01-20
Clinical Radiology
Abstract:AIM To determine the frequency and classification of addenda seen in paediatric brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review of the addenda of brain MRI reports from a large tertiary children's hospital was undertaken between January 2013 to December 2021 and a subset of above radiology reports was used to classify addenda over 6-month periods, October to March, spanning 2018 to 2021. A radiology fellow and a medical doctor classified the addenda into previously published categories using their best judgement. RESULTS Out of 73,643 brain MRI reports over 9 years (108 months) included in the study, only 923 reports (1.25%) had addenda. There was a total of 13,615 brain MRI reports from 6-month periods, of which only 179 reports (1.31%) had an addendum. The number of errors according to categories were: observational 88/13,615 (0.65%); Interpretational 16/13,615 (0.12%); non-observational and non-interpretative 82/13,615 (0.6%). Notifications to referring physician made up 29/13,615 (0.21%). CONCLUSIONS The overall proportion of addenda to the brain MRI reports of children in the present study was low, at 1.25%. Categorisation of different addenda revealed the most common errors to be observational in 0.65%, including under-reading in the region of interest in 0.25%. Appropriate measures can now be introduced to minimise the error-based addenda further and improve MRI diagnosis in children. Other paediatric practices may choose to follow suit in evaluating their addenda and errors to improve practice.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?