Abstract:Introduction: Benign ureterointestinal anastomotic stricture (UIAS) is a recognized long-term complication following radical cystectomy with urinary diversion (UD). The incidence of UIAS following robotic-assisted radical cystectomy varies, with reported rates ranging from 6.5%-25.3%.1 Although endourologic treatments have been employed, their overall success rate is relatively low, ranging from 26%-50%. In contrast, open surgical revision has demonstrated higher success rates, between 80% and 91%.2,3 Given the morbidity associated with open surgery, there has been a shift toward minimally invasive approaches. The robotic approach offers a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery that is not inferior, with similar outcomes for UIAS reconstruction.4 In this video, we demonstrate a robotic technique for the revision of UIAS, which aims to combine the effectiveness of open surgery with the reduced morbidity of a minimally invasive approach. Materials and methods: From May 2020-March 2023, 6 patients underwent surgery. The mean age was 62 years (range 49-68 years). Among these, 2 patients received conduits in open technique and 4 were provided with robotic neobladders. The strictures were located as follows: 2 on the left side, 2 on the right, and 2 on both sides. The average time to stricture formation in the series was 4.5 months. The case presented involves a 49-year-old man who developed a left ureteroileal anastomotic stricture (UIAS) 6 months following robot-assisted radical cystectomy and neobladder creation. The obstruction was managed initially with nephrostomy tube drainage. The surgical technique employed is demonstrated in a step-by-step manner. Standard Da Vinci surgical instruments were used. The patient was positioned in a 30° Trendelenburg position, with port placement similar to that in robotic prostatectomy. The pneumoperitoneum was established through a supraumbilical mini-laparotomy using the Hasson technique. Adhesions around the neobladder were carefully freed. Subsequently, the affected ureter and the stricture were identified and localized. This was achieved by intraluminal application of 10 mL of indocyanine green solution (2.5 mg/mL concentration) through the nephrostomy catheter. The ureter was mobilized as needed. The ureteral stricture was identified and then fully excised. To exclude any malignancy at the ureteral margin, a frozen section analysis was conducted. The ureter was then spatulated. Reanastomosis between the ureter and neobladder was performed using a continuous 4-0 Stratafix suture. A double-J ureteral catheter was inserted to secure the anastomosis, and the anastomosis was completed over this catheter. Results: The mean operative time at the robotic console was 122 minutes, ranging from 80-160 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 42 mL, within a range of 50-100 mL. Intraoperative frozen sections revealed no evidence of malignancy in all cases. No postoperative complications exceeding Clavien-Dindo grade 3 were observed. Two patients were treated for symptomatic urinary tract infections. The median length of stay in the hospital was 4 days, with a range of 2-7 days. Median times for cystography with transurethral catheter removal and double-J catheter removal were 15 postoperative days (range: 12-27) and 23 postoperative days (range: 17-37), respectively. No recurrence of the condition was observed during a mean follow-up period of 23 months (range 6-40 months). Conclusion: The robotic approach represents a viable, minimally invasive alternative to conventional open surgery for the reconstruction of UIAS following urinary diversion. The surgical outcomes are comparable to those of open surgery, with the added benefits of a minimally invasive approach, including reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stays.

The current state of robotic ureteral reconstruction for benign ureteral strictures in adults

Robotic ureteral reconstruction for benign ureteral strictures: a systematic review of surgical techniques, complications and outcomes

Robot-assisted repair of ureteral stricture

A Novel Ureterorenoscope for the Management of Upper Urinary Tract Stones: Initial Experience from a Prospective Multicenter Study.

Robotic-Assisted Management of Ureteral Complications in Post-Renal Transplant Patients: A Case Series and Literature Review

Single-port robotic-assisted ureteral reconstruction for management of strictures after renal transplantation

Robotic-assisted vs. open ureteral reimplantation: a multicentre comparison

Robotic Ureteroplasty with Appendiceal Onlay Flap: an Update on the Outcomes of 18-Month Follow-Up

Robot-assisted laparoscopic ileal ureter replacement with extracorporeal ileal segment preparation for long ureteral strictures: a case series

Robotic-assisted Lingual Mucosal Graft Ureteroplasty for the Repair of Complex Ureteral Strictures: Technique Description and the Medium-term Outcome

Robotic Surgery for Ureteral Anomalies in Children

[Advances in surgical repair of ureteral injury].

Robotic Buccal Mucosa Graft Ureteroplasty: A Decade of Experience from a Multi-Institutional Cohort

Preoperative Factors for Success of Robotic Ureteral Reconstruction for Distal Ureteral Strictures

Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Repair of Kidney Transplant Ureteral Strictures

Robotic Ureteral Reimplantation for the Management of Ureterovaginal Fistula: Four Cases at a Single Center

Robotic Ureter Reimplantation After Urinary Diversion

Combination of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopy and Ureteroscopy for the Management of Complex Ureteral Strictures

Laparoscopic and robotic ureteroplasty using onlay flap or graft for the management of long proximal or middle ureteral strictures: our experience and strategy

Perfect Outcome of Kidney Recipients with Ureteral Stenosis after Treatment with Open Surgery under Magnetic Resonance Urography Localization

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic modified ureteroplasty using lingual mucosa grafts or appendiceal flaps for the management of complex ureteral strictures: a retrospective cohort study