4 n − 10

Andreas W. M. Dress,Jack Koolen,Vincent Moulton
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00026-004-0233-3
2005-01-01
Annals of Combinatorics
Abstract:. We show that the maximal number K 2 ( n ) of splits in a 2- compatible split system on an n -set is exactly 4 n − 10, for every n > 3. Since K 2 ( n ) = CF 3 ( n )/2 where CF 3 ( n ) is the maximal number of members in any 3- cross-free collection of (proper) subsets of an n -set, this gives a definitive answer to a question raised in 1979 by A. Karzanov who asked whether CF 3 ( n ) is, as a function of n , of type O ( n ). Karzanov’s question was answered first by P. Pevzner in 1987 who showed K 2 ( n ) ≤ 6 n , a result that was improved by T. Fleiner in 1998 who showed K 2 ( n ) ≤ 5 n . The argument given in the paper below establishes that the even slightly stronger inequality K 2 ( n ) ≤ 4 n − 10 holds for every n > 3; the identity K 2 ( n ) = 4 n − 10 ( n > 3) then follows in conjunction with a result from a previous paper that implies K 2 ( n ) ≥ 4 n − 10. In that paper, it was also mentioned that—in analogy to well known results regarding maximal weakly compatible split systems—2-compatible split systems of maximal cardinality 4 n − 10 should be expected to be cyclic . Luckily, our approach here permits us also to corroborate this expectation. As a consequence, it is now possible to generate all 2-compatible split systems on an n -set ( n > 3) that have maximal cardinality 4 n − 10 (or, equivalently, all 3-cross-free set systems that have maximal cardinality 8 n − 20) in a straight forward, systematic manner.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?