Research oncorrelation 2D and 3D image measurement of adenoid and pper airways

冯光耀,高雪梅
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115797-20210120-21412
2021-01-01
Abstract:Objective:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the methodology of 2D and 3D image measurement of adenoid and upper airway.Methods:The subjects were patients who had previously taken lateral cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images due to impacted teeth or temporomandibular joint disease before orthodontic treatment. Thirty patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 18 were girls, 12 were boys, and the age range was 7 to 14 years. Measurements of adenoid (A), nasopharynx (N), R-PNS and A/N were evaluated on cephalometrics; and A, N and A/N were measured on mid-sagittal, cross-sectional and coronal section on CBCT. The accuracy of measuring adenoid and upper airway on lateral cephalogram was evaluated.Results:The values of A, N, A/N measured in lateral cephalogram(13.01±3.04 mm、26.50±3.05 mm、0.49±0.10) were not significantly different from those measured on mid-sagittal plane of CBCT(13.29±3.42 mm, 26.62±2.19 mm, 0.50±0.11, P>0.05), but were different on axial(15.36±4.87 mm、28.54±4.65 mm、0.54±0.10, P<0.01) and coronal plane(A: 16.55±4.31 mm, P<0.01), nonetheless there remained a good consistency( P<0.05.)Measurements of nasopharynx, velopharynx, and lower pharynx on cephalometric distance were relative with volume and cross-sectional area on CBCT( P<0.05). Conclusions:To a certain extent, lateral cephalometric can reflect the size of adenoid and upper airway.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?