Abstract:In the era of big-data, individuals and institutions store their sensitive data on clouds, and these data are often analyzed and computed by MapReduce frameworks (e.g., Spark). However, releasing the computation result on these data may leak privacy. Differential Privacy (DP) is a powerful method to preserve the privacy of an individual data record from a computation result. Given an input dataset and a query, DP typically perturbs an output value with noise proportional to sensitivity, the greatest change on an output value when a record is added to or removed from the input dataset. Unfortunately, directly computing the sensitivity value for a query and an input dataset is computationally infeasible, because it requires adding or removing every record from the dataset and repeatedly running the same query on the dataset: a dataset of one million input records requires running the same query for more than one million times. This paper presents UPA, the first automated, accurate, and efficient sensitivity inferring approach for big-data mining applications. Our key observation is that MapReduce operators often have commutative and associative properties in order to enable parallelism and fault tolerance among computers. Therefore, UPA can greatly reduce the repeated computations at runtime while computing a precise sensitivity value automatically for general big-data queries. We compared UPA with FLEX, the most relevant work that does static analysis on queries to infer sensitivity values. Based on an extensive evaluation on nine diverse Spark queries, UPA supports all the nine evaluated queries, while FLEX supports only five of the nine queries. For the five queries which both UPA and FLEX can support, UPA enforces DP with five orders of magnitude more accurate sensitivity values than FLEX. UPA has reasonable performance overhead compared to native Spark. UPA's source code is available on https://github.com/hku-systems/UPA.

PrivNUD: Effective Range Query Processing under Local Differential Privacy.

Data-Driven Caching with Users' Local Differential Privacy in Information-Centric Networks

NetDP: In-Network Differential Privacy for Large-Scale Data Processing

AHEAD: Adaptive Hierarchical Decomposition for Range Query under Local Differential Privacy

UPA: an Automated, Accurate and Efficient Differentially Private Big-Data Mining System

PriPL-Tree: Accurate Range Query for Arbitrary Distribution under Local Differential Privacy

Toward Answering Federated Spatial Range Queries Under Local Differential Privacy

Local Differential Privacy for data collection and analysis

Local Differential Privacy and Its Applications: A Comprehensive Survey

An Efficient Heap Tree Based Range Query Scheme Under Local Differential Privacy

A Range Query Scheme for Spatial Data with Shuffled Differential Privacy

A Comprehensive Survey on Local Differential Privacy toward Data Statistics and Analysis

Mean Estimation of Numerical Data Under (ε,δ) -Utility-Optimized Local Differential Privacy

The Normal Distributions Indistinguishability Spectrum and its Application to Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning

PrivBV: Distance-aware Encoding for Distributed Data with Local Differential Privacy

AAA: an Adaptive Mechanism for Locally Differential Private Mean Estimation

Joint Communication and Learning Design of Differential Privacy for Federated Learning over Multi-cell Networks.

Collecting Partial Ordered Data With Local Differential Privacy

Learning with User-Level Local Differential Privacy

FLDP: Flexible strategy for local differential privacy