Abstract:Effective human-robot teaming (HRT) increasingly requires humans to work with intelligent, autonomous machines. However, novel features of intelligent autonomous systems such as social agency and incomprehensibility may influence the human's trust in the machine. The human operator's mental model for machine functioning is critical for trust. People may consider an intelligent machine partner as either an advanced tool or as a human-like teammate. This article reports a study that explored the role of individual differences in the mental model in a simulated environment. Multiple dispositional factors that may influence the dominant mental model were assessed. These included the Robot Threat Assessment (RoTA), which measures the person's propensity to apply tool and teammate models in security contexts. Participants (N = 118) were paired with an intelligent robot tasked with making threat assessments in an urban setting. A transparency manipulation was used to influence the dominant mental model. For half of the participants, threat assessment was described as physics-based (e.g., weapons sensed by sensors); the remainder received transparency information that described psychological cues (e.g., facial expression). We expected that the physics-based transparency messages would guide the participant toward treating the robot as an advanced machine (advanced tool mental model activation), while psychological messaging would encourage perceptions of the robot as acting like a human partner (teammate mental model). We also manipulated situational danger cues present in the simulated environment. Participants rated their trust in the robot's decision as well as threat and anxiety, for each of 24 urban scenes. They also completed the RoTA and additional individual-difference measures. Findings showed that trust assessments reflected the degree of congruence between the robot's decision and situational danger cues, consistent with participants acting as Bayesian decision makers. Several scales, including the RoTA, were more predictive of trust when the robot was making psychology-based decisions, implying that trust reflected individual differences in the mental model of the robot as a teammate. These findings suggest scope for designing training that uncovers and mitigates the individual's biases toward intelligent machines.

Effects of Robot's Language and Attribute Framing on People's Risky Behavior.

How to Provide Feedback? the Role of Robot’s Language and Feedback Framework

Will You Listen to a Robot? Effects of Robot Ability, Task Complexity, and Risk on Human Decision-Making

Treat Robots As Humans? Perspective Choice in Human-Human and Human-Robot Spatial Language Interaction.

Robotic Moment: the Influence Mechanism of Frequency of Socializing on Willingness to Interact with AI Robots

When in Rome: the Role of Culture &#x00026; Context in Adherence to Robot Recommendations

A Robot by Any Other Frame: Framing and Behaviour Influence Mind Perception in Virtual but not Real-World Environments

A Cross-cultural Study: Effect of Robot Appearance and Task

Interactive effects of users' openness and robot reliability on trust: evidence from psychological intentions, task performance, visual behaviours, and cerebral activations

Effects of Communication Style and Culture on Ability to Accept Recommendations from Robots

The Effects of Perceived Identity Threat and Realistic Threat on the Negative Attitudes and Usage Intentions Toward Hotel Service Robots: The Moderating Effect of the Robot’s Anthropomorphism

(Hu)man-Like Robots: The Impact of Anthropomorphism and Language on Perceived Robot Gender

Anthropomorphic framing and failure comprehensibility influence different facets of trust towards industrial robots

Sustainable Impact of Stance Attribution Design Cues for Robots on Human–Robot Relationships—Evidence from the ERSP

Do People Regard Robots As Human-Like Social Partners? Evidence from Perspective-Taking in Spatial Descriptions.

Effects of Robots' Character and Information Disclosure on Human–Robot Trust and the Mediating Role of Social Presence

How language of interaction affects the user perception of a robot

Differences in Social Expectations About Robot Signals and Human Signals

Effects of Task Structure and Attribution Target on Responsibility Attributions in Human–robot Interaction

The Effect of Robot Skill Level and Communication in Rapid, Proximate Human-Robot Collaboration

Trust in the Danger Zone: Individual Differences in Confidence in Robot Threat Assessments