Abstract:Uncertainty and fuzziness pervade natural language both explicitly and implicitly. The explicit presence of uncertainty and fuzziness is exemplified by statements like I believe that tomorrow will probably be a bit colder than today, while the presence of implicit uncertainty and/or fuzziness can be referred to background domain knowledge, e.g. in the statement Tomorrow will be rainy because the weather forecast says so, it is part of the background knowledge that weather forecasts are uncertain and that the notion of being rainy is not crisp. Argument mining, namely the task of automatically identifying and analyzing arguments in natural language texts, is receiving an increasing attention from the research communities of formal argumentation and computational linguistics, since the argumentation paradigm provides a very general and intuitive model of human communication, interaction and reasoning activities. Most current formal (or semi-formal) argumentation models however allow for very limited ways, if any, to express explicit uncertainty and fuzziness within argument structure. On the one hand, there are several proposals to encompass uncertainty (mainly adopting a probabilistic representation) and fuzziness within the formalism of Dung's argumentation frameworks, which however is not suitable for a direct representation of natural language arguments since it lies at a too abstract level. On the other hand, several models which are meant to capture more closely the way humans conceive and produce arguments, like Walton's argumentation schemes, up to now do not encompass explicit forms of uncertainty or fuzziness. Further, dealing with implicit uncertainty in formal argumentation is largely an open question. This evidences a big gap between current argumentation models and the capability of faithfully capturing the information conveyed by natural language texts: in particular, the use of current models implies a drastic simplification in (or, simply, the suppression of) the representation of uncertainty and fuzziness. The talk will discuss the modeling challenges posed by the presence of uncertainty and fuzziness in natural language texts (first of all the problem of defining a suitable ontology for these concepts, e.g. in order to distinguish different kinds of uncertainty) and analyze some research directions aiming at addressing these challenges in the context of argumentation models.

A Bayesian Approach to Uncertainty Modelling in OWL Ontology

A Bayesian Approach to Uncertainty Modeling in OWL Ontology

BayesOWL: Uncertainty Modeling in Semantic Web Ontologies

A Bayesian Methodology Towards Automatic Ontology Mapping

A Bayesian Network Approach to Ontology Mapping

BayesOWL: A Prototype System for Uncertainty in Semantic Web.

A Fuzzy MEBN Ontology Language Based on OWL2.

A Probabilistic Framework for Semantic Similarity and Ontology Mapping

Bayesian-knowledge driven ontologies: A framework for fusion of semantic knowledge under uncertainty and incompleteness

ProbFuzzOnto: A Fuzzy Ontology-Driven Uncertainty Approach Using Fuzzy Bayesian Networks

Development of a novel asset management system for power transformers based on ontology

Be Bayesian by Attachments to Catch More Uncertainty

Uncertainty and Fuzziness from Natural Language to Argumentation Models

A quantitative risk analysis model considering uncertain information

An Overview of Bayesian Network Applications in Uncertain Domains

Ontology-Based Reasoning with Uncertain Context in a Smart Home: A Decision Network Approach

Semantically-linked Bayesian Network: a Framework for Probabilistic Inference over Multiple Bayesian Networks

Uncertainty Reasoning for Smart Homes: an Ontological Decision Network Based Approach

Ontology Mapping Based on Multi-strategy and Bayesian Network

A Methodology for Modeling Wastewater Treatment Process Based on Uncertainty Theory

Learning uncertain knowledge from uncertain data