Abstract:Failing to communicate current knowledge limitations, i.e. epistemic uncertainty, in environmental risk assessment (ERA) may have severe consequences for decision‐making. Bayesian Networks (BNs) have gained popularity in ERA, primarily because they can combine variables from different models and integrate data and expert judgement. This paper highlights potential gaps in the treatment of uncertainty when using BNs for ERA and proposes a consistent framework (and a set of methods) for treating epistemic uncertainty to help close these gaps. The proposed framework describes the treatment of epistemic uncertainty about the model structure, parameters, expert judgement, data, management scenarios, and the assessment's output. We identify issues related to the differentiation between aleatory and epistemic uncertainty and the importance of communicating both uncertainties associated with the assessment predictions (direct uncertainty) and the strength of knowledge supporting the assessment (indirect uncertainty). Probabilities, intervals, or scenarios are expressions of direct epistemic uncertainty. The type of BN determines the treatment of parameter uncertainty: epistemic, aleatory, or predictive. Epistemic BNs are useful for probabilistic reasoning about states of the world in light of evidence. Aleatory BNs are the most relevant for ERA, but they are not sufficient to treat epistemic uncertainty alone, as they do not explicitly express parameter uncertainty. For uncertainty analysis, we recommend embedding an aleatory BN into a model for parameter uncertainty. BNs do not contain information about uncertainty in the model structure, which requires several models. Statistical models (e.g., hierarchical modelling outside the BNs) are required to consider uncertainties and variability associated with data. We highlight the importance of being open about things one does not know and carefully choosing a method to precisely communicate both direct and indirect uncertainty in ERA.EDITOR'S NOTE: This article is part of the special series "Applications of Bayesian Networks for Environmental Risk Assessment and Management" and was generated from a session on the use of Bayesian networks (BNs) in environmental modelling and assessment in 1 of 3 recent conferences: SETAC North America 2018 (Sacramento), SETAC Europe 2019 (Helsinki), and European Geosciences Union 2019 (Vienna). The 3 sessions aimed at showing the state‐of‐the art and new directions in the use of BN models in environmental assessment, focusing on ecotoxicology and water quality modelling. This series aims at reflecting the broad applicability of BN methodology in environmental assessment across a range of ecosystem types and scales, and discusses the relevance for environmental management.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Learning uncertain knowledge from uncertain data

Learning bayesian networks using domain knowledge: An empirical study

Locally Weighted Learning: How and when Does It Work in Bayesian Networks?

Data-Intensive Learning Of Uncertain Knowledge

Bayesian Network Structure Learning from Attribute Uncertain Data.

Uncertain Knowledge Representation And Inference For Lineage Processing Over Uncertain Data

Towards an effective practice of learning from data and knowledge

Fusing Uncertain Knowledge In Time-Series Data

A survey of Bayesian Network structure learning

Uncertain Knowledge Representation And Inference For Tracing Errors In Uncertain Data

“This Is What We Don't Know”: Treating Epistemic Uncertainty in Bayesian Networks for Risk Assessment

Extraction of Belief Knowledge from a Relational Database for Quantitative Bayesian Network Inference

Learning from Uncertain Data: From Possible Worlds to Possible Models

Insights into the kinetochore.

Expert Knowledge-Driven Bayesian Network Modeling for Marine Disaster Assessment Under the Small Sample Condition

Data-Intensive Inferences Of Large-Scale Bayesian Networks

Learning Bayesian Multinets from Labeled and Unlabeled Data for Knowledge Representation.

A Bayesian end-to-end model with estimated uncertainties for simple question answering over knowledge bases

Learning Bayesian Network Parameters from Limited Data by Integrating Entropy and Monotonicity

Be Bayesian by Attachments to Catch More Uncertainty

Probability Knowledge Acquisition from Unlabeled Instance Based on Dual Learning