Abstract:Several computer programs are available for detecting copy number variants (CNVs) using genome-wide SNP arrays. We evaluated the performance of four CNV detection software suites-Birdsuite, Partek, HelixTree, and PennCNV-Affy-in the identification of both rare and common CNVs. Each program's performance was assessed in two ways. The first was its recovery rate, i.e., its ability to call 893 CNVs previously identified in eight HapMap samples by paired-end sequencing of whole-genome fosmid clones, and 51,440 CNVs identified by array Comparative Genome Hybridization (aCGH) followed by validation procedures, in 90 HapMap CEU samples. The second evaluation was program performance calling rare and common CNVs in the Bipolar Genome Study (BiGS) data set (1001 bipolar cases and 1033 controls, all of European ancestry) as measured by the Affymetrix SNP 6.0 array. Accuracy in calling rare CNVs was assessed by positive predictive value, based on the proportion of rare CNVs validated by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), while accuracy in calling common CNVs was assessed by false positive/false negative rates based on qPCR validation results from a subset of common CNVs. Birdsuite recovered the highest percentages of known HapMap CNVs containing >20 markers in two reference CNV datasets. The recovery rate increased with decreased CNV frequency. In the tested rare CNV data, Birdsuite and Partek had higher positive predictive values than the other software suites. In a test of three common CNVs in the BiGS dataset, Birdsuite's call was 98.8% consistent with qPCR quantification in one CNV region, but the other two regions showed an unacceptable degree of accuracy. We found relatively poor consistency between the two "gold standards,'' the sequence data of Kidd et al., and aCGH data of Conrad et al. Algorithms for calling CNVs especially common ones need substantial improvement, and a "gold standard'' for detection of CNVs remains to be established.

Comprehensive evaluation and guidance of structural variation detection tools in chicken whole genome sequence data

Cataloguing Plant Genome Structural Variations

Overview of structural variation calling: Simulation, identification, and visualization

Accuracy Of Cnv Detection From Gwas Data

Comprehensive and deep evaluation of structural variation detection pipelines with third-generation sequencing data

A Practical Guide for Structural Variation Detection in the Human Genome

Genome-wide detection of structural variation in some sheep breeds using whole-genome long-read sequencing data

Comprehensive evaluation and characterisation of short read general-purpose structural variant calling software

Structural variation discovery in wheat using PacBio high-fidelity sequencing

Comprehensive Evaluation of Structural Variant Genotyping Methods Based on Long-Read Sequencing Data.

Calling structural variants with confidence from short-read data in wild bird populations

Hidden Biases in Germline Structural Variant Detection.

SVvalidation: A long-read-based validation method for genomic structural variation

Structural Variant Detection by Large-scale Sequencing Reveals New Evolutionary Evidence on Breed Divergence between Chinese and European Pigs

SVision: a deep learning approach to resolve complex structural variants

PGG.SV: a whole-genome-sequencing-based structural variant resource and data analysis platform

SVmine Improves Structural Variation Detection by Integrative Mining of Predictions from Multiple Algorithms

SVDF: enhancing structural variation detect from long-read sequencing via automatic filtering strategies

Comparison of structural variant callers for massive whole-genome sequence data

Tradeoffs in alignment and assembly-based methods for structural variant detection with long-read sequencing data

SV4GD: a comprehensive structural variation database specially for genetic diseases