Abstract:Social Cognition, Culture and the Self Albert Newen (albert.newen@rub.de) Ruhr-Universitat Bochum, Institut fur Philosophie II Gary Bente (bente@uni-koeln.de) Universitat Koln, Dept. of Psychology Shinobu Kitayama University of Michigan, Dept. of Psychology Shihui Han Peking University, Dept. of Psychology Kai Vogeley Clinic of Psychiatry, Universitat Koln Abstract The processing of social information belongs to the most complex cognitive capacities of humans, enabling us to live together in social communities. The symposium will focus on the everyday competence to form social impressions and understand others. This capability includes 1. the understanding of oneself on the basis of an explicit self- construal, 2. the understanding of others by processing their mental and bodily characteristics and states 3. the understanding of social encounters by adequately interpreting actions, communicative signals and social roles. Human communication is essentially embedded in cultural contexts and is shaped by it; at the same time it constitutes the cultural background shared by the interactants. The main goal of this symposium is to investigate the role of cognitive and cultural factors influencing self-construal, person perception and understanding of others. Thus we deal with the following leading questions: How do we understand other human beings, what are the best theoretical perspectives, what can we learn from cognitive psychology and neurosciences and what is the role of culture in the process of understanding oneself and others? In the recent development of social cognition it has become clear that we not only have to account for the observational stance towards other people but that we also have to systematically consider situations of online interaction with other human beings (2 nd person perspective). The main aim of the symposium is to present the state of the art of some key topics of social and cultural cognition from the perspectives of philosophy of mind, cross-cultural psychology and social-cognitive neuroscience as well as to outline some paradigmatic lines for future research. Albert Newen: The Place of Culture and Self in Theories of Social Understanding How do we make sense of the behaviour of other people? Theory-Theory and Simulation Theory both only account for an observational understanding of others. This motivated the development of the interaction theory (S. Gallagher/D. Hutto). I will shortly outline a main deficit of the latter before I develop an alternative approach: the Person Model Theory. Person models are the basis for our ability to register and evaluate behaviour. I argue that there are two kinds of person models we rely on, nonconceptual person schemata and conceptual person images (and both kinds are developed for groups and for individuals). This theoretical approach accounts for two levels of understanding: intuitive and inferential understanding. Furthermore, it has the advantage to account for the difference of understanding very familiar persons (relying on person models of individuals), on the one hand, and complete strangers (reyling on person model for groups and thus understanding a person by his social role as a student), on the other. The person model theory accounts for modelling myself by presupposing self-models in addition to models of others. The theory allows to spell out the interaction of relying on modelling oneself and others and finally it explicitly accounts for the role of culture as shaping the mind. (s. Newen/Schlicht 2009; de Bruin/Newen 2011). Gary Bente & T. Dratsch: The Role of Tacit Cues and Social Order in Observing Others. Analyzing Nonverbal Behaviour and Impression Formation across Cultures There is ample evidence that visual cues including physical appearance and nonverbal behaviour play a crucial role in person perception and impression formation. A short look at a face can lead to attributions of trustworthiness, a body posture or movement can be perceived as dominant and a smile can lead to warm feelings of connectedness. Humans are highly sensitive to nonverbal signals and our responses are fast and mostly beyond awareness and conscious control. There is also evidence supporting the notion that culture plays a prominent role in molding our nonverbal behaviors. In a series of studies we investigated the role of culture in the processing of nonverbal cues in conflict laden interactions, collaborative tasks as well as economic games focusing on the dimensions of liking, power/control and trust. The studies involving German, American, Chinese and Arab participants clearly point to cultural specificities indicating that distinct cultural values

Culture and Human Inference: Perspectives from Three Traditions

Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction.

Culture Changes How We Think About Thinking: From “Human Inference” to “Geography of Thought”

What are the roots of human culture?

Inference and culture: The distinction between low context culture and high context culture as a possible explanation for cultural differences in cognition

Culture and Systems of Thought: Comparison of Holistic and Analytic Cognition

Culture and Systems of Thought: Holistic Versus Analytic Cognition

Social Cognition, Culture and the Self. an Interdisciplinary Investigation.

Of Mice and Culture: How Beliefs About Knowing Affect Habits of Thinking

A World unto Itself: Human Communication as Active Inference

The human nature of culture and education

Neural Processes of Culturally Familiar Information

Cultures and Systems of Thought: A Preliminary Investigation on Implications for the Design Process and Its Artifacts

Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.

Culture and Decision Making in China, Japan, Russia, and the United States

Culture: Procedure Created by Human and Orientation Pursued for Human

Modeling Human Behavior Part I -- Learning and Belief Approaches

A Theory of a Human-Centered Social Cognitive Chain

Culture and Social Identity

Culture shapes the evolution of cognition

Manifestations, social impact, and decay of conceptual beliefs: A cultural perspective