Analysis on the peasant's and herder's choice of livelihood transition path and its influencing factors:An example of agro-pastoral ecotone in Yellow River Basin

ZHOU Shengqiang,ZHAO Kai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2023.141

2023-01-01

Abstract:Based on the third-phase panel data of 346 peasants’ and herders’ livelihoods in the agro-pastoral ecotone of the Yellow River Basin, we described the livelihood transition path for peasants and herders, and the ordered Probit model and multiple Logit models were used to analyze the factors influencing livelihood transition path choice for peasants and herders from livelihood capital, regional vulnerability background and policy. The findings are as follows: 1) The peasant’s and herder’s choice of livelihood transition path in the agro-pastoral ecotone of the Yellow River Basin is characterized by "involution". Since 2010, the peasant’s and herder’s livelihood was being more and mong dependent on animal husbandry and subsidies, while less dependent on agriculture and non-agricultural animal husbandry, and the degradation and maintenance transformation paths have become the main choices of livelihood transition for peasants and herders. 2) The enhancement of human capital and social capital is helpful to break the "involution" of livelihood transition of peasants and herders, while the enhancement of financial capital strengthens the "involution". The enhancement of human capital and social capital will help peasants and herdsmen to choose the path of aggressive livelihood transition, especially the choice of equalization, non-agricultural and pastoral transition path. Peasants and herdsmen with enhanced financial capital are more inclined to choose the transformation path of degraded livelihood, especially the transformation path of pastoralization and agriculturalization. 3) Regional vulnerability background, policy and basic livelihood strategy will significantly affect the choice of livelihood transition path for peasants and herders. The more severe the impact of livelihood risk, the more inclined the peasants and herders are to choose the aggressive livelihood transition path, especially non-agricultural and pastoral transition path. The implementation of ecological compensation policy restricts the peasants and herders to choose the livestockt ransition path of concurrent business of husbandry and agriculture. The higher the non-agricultural and pastoral level of the livelihood strategy is in base period, the more inclined the farmers and herders are to choose the degraded transition path.