Livelihood-environment Trade-off under the Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) at Decadal Scale in Northwest China

Tao Tian,Sai-Yong Zhu,Jian Zhang,Xu-Zhe Zhao,Ling Zhao,Fazal Ullah,Meng-Ying Li,Ze-Ying Zhao,You-Cai Xiong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecofro.2024.09.005

2024-01-01

Abstract:The payment for ecosystem services (PES) has attracted increasing attentions as a strategy to avoid the poverty-environment trap. It is little documented how the PES implementation affects the participation of stakeholders from the perspective of coupled human and natural system. To address this issue, we first conceptualized and analyzed the trade-off among the stakeholders using evolutionary game theory under Grain for Green Program (GFGP). The evolutionary stable strategies and the stability dynamics of the conceptualized model were obtained. An integrated social-ecological investigation was performed in a rural community of northwest China at the first phase of GFGP (10-year period) to verify the conceptualized model. The results of evolutionary game analysis showed that improving substitutive off-farm opportunities and income levels can strategically coordinate the so-called inherent conflicts between livelihood development and ecosystem conservation. The behavior strategies of farmers regarding their cognition, adoption and responses (practical implementation) were siginficantly affected by the GFGP. Simultaneously, forest cover and per capita bio-capacity were evidently improved under the conservation program. Relative contribution rate analyses showed that those farmer households with more farmlands of low yield potential (larger area of sloping farmlands) tended to have lower total income. Therefore, the total incomes of the households participating in the program were significantly increased at the ending year of GFGP, relative to the starting year (P < 0.05). Considering the key contributions of household income and farming system to ecosystem conservation, it was needed to design further supporting policies for small farmers. The findings highlight the key role of PES on adaptive livelihood management in avoiding the poverty-environment trap in fragile ecosystems where small farmers are dominant.