Abstract:ObjectivesProstate cancer (PCa) diagnosis still relies on 12-core systematic biopsy (SBx). More recently, pre-biopsy multiparametric MRI has been introduced in the guidelines as a valuable imaging tool for the detection of significant PCa. However, poor reproducibility and specificity, along with its high cost and limited availability, evidence the need for cost-effective, widespread imaging alternatives. 3D contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has shown promise for PCa localization by extraction of quantitative perfusion and dispersion features associated with cancer angiogenesis. Tissue stiffness is an additional PCa biomarker that can be quantified by ultrasound shear-wave elastography (SWE). In this study, the diagnostic potential of multiparametric ultrasound imaging, combining 3D CEUS and SWE features, was evaluated for PCa localization by comparison with the corresponding SBx outcome.MaterialsAfter signing an informed consent, 54 biopsy-naïve patients underwent a 3D CEUS recording using a LOGIQ E9 scanner (GE HealthCare, USA) and a multi-plane (probe sweep) 2D SWE scan using an Aixplorer scanner (SuperSonic Imagine, France) at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (China). All patients received SBx. Multiple 3D perfusion and dispersion feature maps were extracted from the 3D CEUS acquisitions and further complemented with 3D maps of tissue stiffness, reconstructed based on the multi-plane 2D SWE acquisitions. Subsequently, all the 3D maps were subdivided in 12 regions corresponding to the SBx locations. Gradient Boosting (GB) classification was then implemented together with sequential floating forward feature selection for prediction of the biopsy outcome. The classification accuracy was assessed by a k-fold cross-validation procedure.ResultsOf the 54 patients, 20 had SBx-proven significant PCa. Prediction of biopsy outcome using only CEUS features produced an area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.81, while using the SWE elasticity alone produced an AUC of 0.66. Their combination yielded an improved AUC of 0.85.ConclusionsThe proposed 3D multiparametric ultrasound imaging approach yields accurate PCa classification results, showing promise for cost-effective PCa localization by multiparametric ultrasound imaging. A multicenter trial has recently started to validate and optimize the classification performance in a larger patient cohort.

Three-dimensional Estimation of Ultrasound-Contrast-agent Dispersion and Convection in the Prostate

Convective-Dispersion Modeling in 3D Contrast-Ultrasound Imaging for the Localization of Prostate Cancer.

3-D Quantitative Dynamic Contrast Ultrasound for Prostate Cancer Localization.

3D Contrast Ultrasound Dispersion Imaging by Mutual Information for Prostate Cancer Localization

3-D Multi-parametric Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Prediction of Prostate Cancer.

Machine Learning for the Prediction of Prostate Cancer Biopsy Based on 3D Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Quantification

Multiparametric Ultrasound and Machine Learning for Prostate Cancer Localization

Probabilistic 3D Contrast-Ultrasound Tractography Based on a a Convective-Dispersion Finite-Element Scheme

3D multiparametric contrast ultrasound predicts the histopathological outcome of systematic biopsy

Can 3D Multiparametric Ultrasound Imaging Predict Prostate Biopsy Outcome?

PREDICTION OF PROSTATE BIOPSY OUTCOME BY MULTIPARAMETRIC ULTRASOUND IMAGING

Pharmacokinetic parameters quantification in DCE-MRI for prostate cancer

Three-dimensional Ultrasound Analyses of the Prostate.

Three-dimensional Transrectal Ultrasonography of Prostate Cancer

Distortion-free 3D diffusion imaging of the prostate using a multishot diffusion-prepared phase-cycled acquisition and dictionary matching

A Feasibility Study of Novel Ultrasonic Tissue Characterization for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis: 2d Spectrum Analysis of in Vivo Data with Histology As Gold Standard

Clinical application of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound in renal tumors

Evaluation of Performance Tradeoffs when Using Mechanically Swept 1-D Linear Arrays for 3-D DCE-US

A Preliminary Study of Diagnosing Prostate Cancer with Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR at 3. 0 T

A Comparison of US- Versus MR-Based 3-D Prostate Shapes Using Radial Basis Function Interpolation and Statistical Shape Models

Practical considerations in T1 mapping of prostate for dynamic contrast enhancement pharmacokinetic analyses