Abstract:Purpose: Monitoring tumor response during the course of treatment and adaptively modifying treatment plan based on tumor biological feedback may represent a new paradigm for radiotherapy. Diffusion MRI has shown great promises in assessing and predicting tumor response to radiotherapy. However, the conventional diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar-imaging (DW-ssEPI) technique suffers from limited resolution, severe distortion, and possibly inaccurate ADC at low field strength. The purpose of this work was to develop a reliable, accurate and distortion-free diffusion MRI technique that is practicable for longitudinal tumor response evaluation and adaptive radiotherapy on a 0.35 T MRI-guided radiotherapy system. Methods: A diffusion-prepared turbo spin echo readout (DP-TSE) sequence was developed and compared with the conventional diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar-imaging sequence on a 0.35 T MRI-guided radiotherapy system (ViewRay). A spatial integrity phantom was used to quantitate and compare the geometric accuracy of the two diffusion sequences for three orthogonal orientations. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) accuracy was evaluated on a diffusion phantom under both 0 degrees C and room temperature to cover a diffusivity range between 0.40 x 10(-3) and 2.10 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. Ten room temperature measurements repeated on five different days were conducted to assess the ADC reproducibility of DP-TSE. Two glioblastoma (GBM) and six sarcoma patients were included to examine the in vivo feasibility. The target registration error (TRE) was calculated to quantitate the geometric accuracy where structural CT or MR images were co-registered to the diffusion images as references. ADC maps from DP-TSE and DW-ssEPI were calculated and compared. A tube phantom was placed next to patients not treated on ViewRay, and ADCs of this reference tube were also compared. Results: The proposed DP-TSE passed the spatial integrity test (< 1 mm within 100 mm radius and < 2 mm within 175 mm radius) under the three orthogonal orientations. The detected errors were 0.474 0.355 mm, 0.475 +/- 0.287 mm, and 0.546 +/- 0.336 mm in the axial, coronal, and sagittal plane. DW-ssEPI, however, failed the tests due to severe distortion and low signal intensity. Noise correction must be performed for the DW-ssEPI to avoid ADC quantitation errors, whereas it is optional for DP-TSE. At 0 degrees C, the two sequences provided accurate quantitation with < 3% variation with the reference. In the room temperature study, discrepancies between ADCs from DP-TSE and the reference were within 4%, but could be as high as 8% for DW-ssEPI after the noise correction. Excellent ADC reproducibility with a coefficient of variation < 5% was observed among the 10 measurements of DP-TSE, indicating desirable robustness for ADC-based tumor response assessment. In vivo TRE in DP-TSE was less than 1.6 mm overall, whereas it could be greater than 12 mm in DW-ssEPI. For GBM patients, the CSF and brain tissue ADCs from DP-TSE were within the ranges found in literature. ADC differences between the two techniques were within 8% among the six sarcoma patients. For the reference tube that had a relatively low diffusivity, the two diffusion sequences provided matched measurements. Conclusion: A diffusion technique with excellent geometric fidelity, accurate, and reproducible ADC measurement was demonstrated for longitudinal tumor response assessment using a low-field MRI-guided radiotherapy system. (C) 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Distortion-free 3D diffusion imaging of the prostate using a multishot diffusion-prepared phase-cycled acquisition and dictionary matching

3D Isotropic Resolution Diffusion-Prepared Magnitude-Stabilized Bssfp Imaging with High Geometric Fidelity at 1.5 Tesla

Multishot diffusion-prepared magnitude-stabilized balanced steady-state free precession sequence for distortion-free diffusion imaging.

Three-dimensional simultaneous brain T 1 , T 2 , and ADC mapping with MR Multitasking.

Three-dimensional Estimation of Ultrasound-Contrast-agent Dispersion and Convection in the Prostate

Distortion-Free Diffusion MRI using an MRI-Guided Tri-Cobalt 60 Radiotherapy System: Sequence Verification and Preliminary Clinical Experience.

3D distortion‐free, reduced FOV diffusion‐prepared gradient echo at 3 T

Three-dimensional simultaneous brain T<sub>1</sub>, T<sub>2</sub>, and ADC mapping with MR Multitasking

3D distortion-free, reduced field of view diffusion-prepared GRE at 3T

Feasibility Study of 3-T DWI of the Prostate: Readout-Segmented Versus Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging

Chemical shift–encoded multishot EPI for navigator‐free prostate DWI

High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging with interleaved variable-density spiral acquisitions

Preliminary Research for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer by Using Diffusion-weighted Imaging

Giving the prostate the boost it needs: Spiral diffusion MRI using a high‐performance whole‐body gradient system for high b‐values at short echo times

Short-term Reproducibility of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Estimated from Diffusion-Weighted MRI of the Prostate

Multi‐readout DWI with a Reduced FOV for Studying the Coupling Between Diffusion and T2* Relaxation in the Prostate

Multishot Cartesian Turbo Spin-Echo Diffusion Imaging Using Iterative POCSMUSE Reconstruction.

Sampling strategies and integrated reconstruction for reducing distortion and boundary slice aliasing in high‐resolution 3D diffusion MRI

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the prostate with high spatiotemporal resolution using compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and continuous golden-angle radial sampling: Preliminary experience.

Rapid golden-angle diffusion-weighted propeller MRI for simultaneous assessment of ADC and IVIM

Accurate, repeatable, and geometrically precise diffusion-weighted imaging on a 0.35 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided linear accelerator