Abstract:Treatment effect plays an important role on decision making in many fields, such as social marketing, healthcare, and public policy. The key challenge on estimating treatment effect in the wild observational studies is to handle confounding bias induced by imbalance of the confounder distributions between treated and control units. Traditional methods remove confounding bias by re-weighting units with supposedly accurate propensity score estimation under the unconfoundedness assumption. Controlling high-dimensional variables may make the unconfoundedness assumption more plausible, but poses new challenge on accurate propensity score estimation. One strand of recent literature seeks to directly optimize weights to balance confounder distributions, bypassing propensity score estimation. But existing balancing methods fail to do selection and differentiation among the pool of a large number of potential confounders, leading to possible underperformance in many high-dimensional settings. In this article, we propose a data-driven Differentiated Confounder Balancing (DCB) algorithm to jointly select confounders, differentiate weights of confounders and balance confounder distributions for treatment effect estimation in the wild high-dimensional settings. Besides, under some settings with heavy confounding bias, in order to further reduce the bias and variance of estimated treatment effect, we propose a Regression Adjusted Differentiated Confounder Balancing (RA-DCB) algorithm based on our DCB algorithm by incorporating outcome regression adjustment. The synergistic learning algorithms we proposed are more capable of reducing the confounding bias in many observational studies. To validate the effectiveness of our DCB and RA-DCB algorithms, we conduct extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets. The experimental results clearly demonstrate that our algorithms outperform the state-of-the-art methods. By incorporating regression adjustment, our RA-DCB algorithm achieves more precise estimation on treatment effect than DCB algorithm, especially under the settings with heavy confounding bias. Moreover, we show that the top features ranked by our algorithm generate accurate prediction of online advertising effect.

Treatment Effect Estimation with Adjustment Feature Selection

Treatment Effect Estimation Via Differentiated Confounder Balancing and Regression

Lasso-adjusted treatment effect estimation under covariate-adaptive randomization

A New Covariate Selection Strategy for High Dimensional Data in Causal Effect Estimation with Multivariate Treatments

Adaptive sparsening and smoothing of the treatment model for longitudinal causal inference using outcome-adaptive LASSO and marginal fused LASSO

Treatment Effect Estimation With Data-Driven Variable Decomposition

Learning Decomposed Representations for Treatment Effect Estimation

Are causal effect estimations enough for optimal recommendations under multitreatment scenarios?

Confounding Feature Acquisition for Causal Effect Estimation

Matching in Selective and Balanced Representation Space for Treatment Effects Estimation

Optimal Adaptive Experimental Design for Estimating Treatment Effect

A Two-Stage Feature Selection Approach for Robust Evaluation of Treatment Effects in High-Dimensional Observational Data

Flexible Inference of Optimal Individualized Treatment Strategy in Covariate Adjusted Randomization with Multiple Covariates

Estimating Individual Causal Treatment Effect by Variable Decomposition

Inference on Treatment Effects After Selection Amongst High-Dimensional Controls

A general theory of regression adjustment for covariate-adaptive randomization: OLS, Lasso, and beyond

Lasso Adjustments Of Treatment Effect Estimates In Randomized Experiments

An exhaustive selection of sufficient adjustment sets for causal inference

Empirical Likelihood-Based Estimation and Inference in Randomized Controlled Trials with High-Dimensional Covariates

A robust and efficient approach to causal inference based on sparse sufficient dimension reduction

Optimal Transport for Treatment Effect Estimation