Abstract:Treatment effect estimation from observational data is a fundamental problem in causal inference. There are two very different schools of thought that have tackled this problem. On one hand, Pearlian framework commonly assumes structural knowledge (provided by an expert) in form of directed acyclic graphs and provides graphical criteria such as back-door criterion to identify valid adjustment sets. On other hand, potential outcomes (PO) framework commonly assumes that all observed features satisfy ignorability (i.e., no hidden confounding), which in general is untestable. In prior works that attempted to bridge these frameworks, there is an observational criteria to identify an anchor variable and if a subset of covariates (not involving the anchor variable) passes a suitable conditional independence criteria, then that subset is a valid back-door. Our main result strengthens these prior results by showing that under a different expert-driven structural knowledge -- that one variable is a direct causal parent of treatment variable -- remarkably, testing for subsets (not involving the known parent variable) that are valid back-doors is equivalent to an invariance test. Importantly, we also cover the non-trivial case where entire set of observed features is not ignorable (generalizing the PO framework) without requiring knowledge of all parents of treatment variable. Our key technical idea involves generation of a synthetic sub-sampling (or environment) variable that is a function of the known parent variable. In addition to designing an invariance test, this sub-sampling variable allows us to leverage Invariant Risk Minimization, and thus, connects finding valid adjustments (in non-ignorable observational setting) to representation learning. We demonstrate effectiveness and tradeoffs of our approaches on a variety of synthetic data as well as real causal effect estimation benchmarks.

An exhaustive selection of sufficient adjustment sets for causal inference

Handbook of Matching and Weighting Adjustments for Causal Inference

Probably approximately correct high-dimensional causal effect estimation given a valid adjustment set

Longitudinal efficient adjustment sets for time-varying treatment effect estimation in nonparametric causal graphical models

Finding Valid Adjustments under Non-ignorability with Minimal DAG Knowledge

The covariate-adjusted residual estimator and its use in both randomized trials and observational settings

Flexible sensitivity analysis for causal inference in observational studies subject to unmeasured confounding

Covariate adjustment in randomized experiments with missing outcomes and covariates

Estimating Possible Causal Effects with Latent Variables Via Adjustment.

Local search for efficient causal effect estimation

Causal Inference with High-dimensional Discrete Covariates

A general theory of regression adjustment for covariate-adaptive randomization: OLS, Lasso, and beyond

Adjusting Auxiliary Variables under Approximate Neighborhood Interference

Propensity Score Adapted Covariate Selection for Causal Inference

Sufficient dimension reduction for average causal effect estimation

Inference for Two-stage Experiments under Covariate-Adaptive Randomization

Learning sources of variability from high-dimensional observational studies

Variance Reduction for Causal Inference

Toward Unique and Unbiased Causal Effect Estimation From Data With Hidden Variables

Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference

Debiased regression adjustment in completely randomized experiments with moderately high-dimensional covariates