Abstract:Statement of problem: The use of composite resins for the restoration of posterior teeth is popular because of the improved performance and appearance of these materials. Wear resistance continues to be of particular importance when restoring large occlusal areas in posterior teeth. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative wear characteristics of 2 recently introduced nanofiller-based composite resins (Filtek Supreme, Premise) and compare them to the more traditional microhybrid (Point 4) and microfill (Heliomolar RO) materials that have been used for many years. Material and methods: Six specimens (2 mm thick and 15 mm in diameter) of each material were subjected to 3-body wear tests using the Oregon Health Sciences University Oral Wear Simulator to produce abrasive wear and attrition for all specimens using human enamel as the opposing cusp. Profilometric tracings of the worn surfaces were used to determine the relative abrasive wear, attrition wear, and roughness (Ra) of the composite resin substrate. The mean diameter of the antagonist enamel wear facets was determined under a measuring microscope. Qualitative SEM analysis was also used to assess the surface appearance of the resulting enamel and composite resin wear facets. The data were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple range post hoc test (alpha=.05). Results: The results indicated that the composite resin type did not significantly affect the amount of measured attrition (P=.15) but did significantly affect abrasive wear (P=.02). The conventional microfill composite resin (Heliomolar RO) exhibited significantly less abrasive wear than the nanohybrid material (Premise). There was no significant difference in the average size of the opposing enamel wear facet generated by the different composite resin materials. Heliomolar RO resulted in a significantly rougher surface within the wear track than either nanohybrid composite resin (Premise) or microhybrid composite resin (Point 4) but was not significantly different than nanofilled composite resin (Filtek Supreme). Conclusions: The incorporation of nanofillers in 2 of the composite resin materials tested did not significantly improve their wear resistance or the amount of opposing cusp wear when compared to the traditional materials tested.

Surface roughness and gloss alteration of polished resin composites with various filler types after simulated toothbrush abrasion

Surface Roughness and Gloss Retention of Bioactive Resin Composite after Simulated Toothbrush Abrasion

Surface Roughness and Gloss of Polished Nanofilled and Nanohybrid Resin Composites

Surface Properties and Color Stability of Incrementally-Filled and Bulk-Fill Composites after in Vitro Toothbrushing.

The effect of toothbrushing on surface gloss of resin composites

Abrasive wear and surface roughness of contemporary dental composite resin.

"Comparative evaluation of effect of toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion on surface roughness of resin composites with different filler loading:" An in vitro study

The effect of contemporary finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of bulk fill resin composite and nanocomposites

Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of various bulk‐fill and nano‐filled resin‐based composites: An atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy study

Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures

[Surface Roughness and Gloss of Novel Flowable Composites after Polishing and Simulated Brushing Wear].

Effect of Nanofiller on Wear Resistance and Surface Roughness of Resin Composites.

Effects of Filler Components on Surface Roughness of Composite Resin Materials after Polishing

Evaluation of the wear resistance of new nanocomposite resin restorative materials

An In Vitro Investigation Of Wear Resistance And Hardness Of Composite Resins

The Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Properties of New Flowable Bulk-fill Resin Composite

The Nanomechanical and Tribological Properties of Restorative Dental Composites after Exposure in Different Types of Media

Effect of polishing on surface roughness and surface-free energy of direct tooth-colored restorative materials

Effect of Finishing Protocol on Obtaining and Maintaining Gloss in Four Nanohybrid Resin Composites

Effect of thermal cycling on the surface roughness of various resin composites

Effect of bleaching protocols on surface roughness and color change of high- and low-viscosity bulk-fill composite resins.