Abstract:Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine, Ahead of Print. Background:Predictive performance of polygenic risk scores (PRS) varies across populations. To facilitate equitable clinical use, we developed PRS for coronary heart disease (CHD; PRSCHD) for 5 genetic ancestry groups.Methods:We derived ancestry-specific and multi-ancestry PRSCHDbased on pruning and thresholding and continuous shrinkage priors (polygenic risk score for CHD developed using ancestry-based continuous shrinkage methods) applied to summary statistics from the largest multi-ancestry genome-wide association study meta-analysis for CHD to date, including 1.1 million participants from 5 major genetic ancestry groups. Following training and optimization in the Million Veteran Program, we evaluated the best-performing PRSCHDin 176 988 individuals across 9 diverse cohorts.Results:Multi-ancestry polygenic risk score for CHD developed using pruning and thresholding methods and polygenic risk score for CHD developed using ancestry-based continuous shrinkage methods outperformed ancestry-specific Polygenic risk score for CHD developed using pruning and thresholding methods and polygenic risk score for CHD developed using ancestry-based continuous shrinkage methods across a range of tuning values. Two best-performing multi-ancestry PRSCHD(ie, polygenic risk score for CHD developed using pruning and thresholding methods optimized using a multi-ancestry population and polygenic risk score for CHD developed using ancestry-based continuous shrinkage methods optimized using a multi-ancestry population) and 1 ancestry-specific (PRSCSxEUR) were taken forward for validation. Polygenic risk score for CHD developed using pruning and thresholding methods (PT) optimized using a multi-ancestry population demonstrated the strongest association with CHD in individuals of South Asian genetic ancestry and European genetic ancestry (odds ratio per 1 SD [95% CI, 2.75 [2.41–3.14], 1.65 [1.59–1.72]), followed by East Asian genetic ancestry (1.56 [1.50–1.61]), Hispanic/Latino genetic ancestry (1.38 [1.24–1.54]), and African genetic ancestry (1.16 [1.11–1.21]). Polygenic risk score for CHD developed using ancestry-based continuous shrinkage methods optimized using a multi-ancestry population showed the strongest associations in South Asian genetic ancestry (2.67 [2.38–3.00]) and European genetic ancestry (1.65 [1.59–1.71]), lower in East Asian genetic ancestry (1.59 [1.54–1.64]), Hispanic/Latino genetic ancestry (1.51 [1.35–1.69]), and the lowest in African genetic ancestry (1.20 [1.15–1.26]).Conclusions:The use of summary statistics from a large multi-ancestry genome-wide meta-analysis improved the performance of PRSCHDin most ancestry groups compared with single-ancestry methods. Despite the use of one of the largest and most diverse sets of training and validation cohorts to date, improvement of predictive performance was limited in African genetic ancestry. This highlights the need for larger Genome-wide association study datasets of underrepresented populations to enhance the performance of PRSCHD.

Improving polygenic risk prediction in admixed populations by explicitly modeling ancestral-differential effects via GAUDI

Improving polygenic prediction in ancestrally diverse populations

A Stacking Framework for Polygenic Risk Prediction in Admixed Individuals

Quantifying Portable Genetic Effects and Improving Cross-Ancestry Genetic Prediction with GWAS Summary Statistics

Bregman Divergence-Based Data Integration with Application to Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) Heterogeneity Adjustment

PRS-GRID: A Cross and Within Ancestry Polygenic Risk Prediction Method Based on Individual Genetic Distance

Optimization of Multi-Ancestry Polygenic Risk Score Disease Prediction Models

All of Us diversity and scale improve polygenic prediction contextually with greatest improvements for under-represented populations

Leveraging genetic ancestry continuum information to interpolate PRS for admixed populations

JointPRS: A Data-Adaptive Framework for Multi-Population Genetic Risk Prediction Incorporating Genetic Correlation

A Unified Framework for Cross-Population Trait Prediction by Leveraging the Genetic Correlation of Polygenic Traits.

The expected polygenic risk score (ePRS) framework: an equitable metric for quantifying polygenetic risk via modeling of ancestral makeup

Winner's Curse Correction and Variable Thresholding Improve Performance of Polygenic Risk Modeling Based on Genome-Wide Association Study Summary-Level Data

Multi-Ancestry Polygenic Risk Score for Coronary Heart Disease Based on an Ancestrally Diverse Genome-Wide Association Study and Population-Specific Optimization

Identifying Individuals at High Risk for Alzheimers Disease Among Hispanics Using Single and Multi-Ancestry Polygenic Risk Scores

Development of a Polygenic Risk Score to Improve Detection of Peripheral Artery Disease

SPLENDID incorporates continuous genetic ancestry in biobank-scale data to improve polygenic risk prediction across diverse populations

A data-adaptive Bayesian regression approach for polygenic risk prediction

Methodologies underpinning polygenic risk scores estimation: a comprehensive overview

Mitigating type 1 error inflation and power loss in GxE PRS: Genotype–environment interaction in polygenic risk score models

An Ensemble Penalized Regression Method for Multi-ancestry Polygenic Risk Prediction