Evaluation of multiple breast cancer polygenic risk score panels in women of Latin American heritage
Xiaosong Huang,Paul C. Lott,Donglei Hu,Valentina A. Zavala,Zoeb N. Jamal,Tatiana Vidaurre,Sandro Casavilca-Zambrano,Jeannie Navarro Vásquez,Carlos A. Castañeda,Guillermo Valencia,Zaida Morante,Mónica Calderón,Julio E. Abugattas,Hugo A. Fuentes,Ruddy Liendo-Picoaga,Jose M. Cotrina,Silvia P. Neciosup,Patricia Rioja Viera,Luis A. Salinas,Marco Galvez-Nino,Scott Huntsman,Sixto E. Sanchez,Michelle A. Williams,Bizu Gelaye,Ana P. Estrada-Florez,Guadalupe Polanco-Echeverry,Magdalena Echeverry,Alejandro Velez,Jenny A. Carmona-Valencia,Mabel E. Bohorquez-Lozano,Javier Torres,Miguel Cruz,Weang-Kee Ho,Soo Hwang Teo,Mei Chee Tai,Esther M. John,Christopher A. Haiman,David V. Conti,Fei Chen,Gabriela Torres-Mejía,Lawrence H. Kushi,Susan L. Neuhausen,Elad Ziv,Luis G. Carvajal-Carmona,Laura Fejerman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-24-1247
2024-12-05
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Abstract:Background: A substantial portion of the genetic predisposition for breast cancer is explained by multiple common genetic variants of relatively small effect. A subset of these variants, which have been identified mostly in individuals of European and Asian ancestry, have been combined to construct a polygenic risk score (PRS) to predict breast cancer risk, but the prediction accuracy of existing PRSs in Hispanic/Latinx individuals (H/L) remain relatively low. We assessed the performance of several existing PRS panels with and without addition of H/L specific variants among self-reported H/L women. Methods: PRS performance was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Both European and Asian PRSs performed worse in H/L samples compared to original reports. The best European PRS performed better than the best Asian PRS in pooled H/L samples. European PRSs had decreased performance with increasing Indigenous American (IA) ancestry while Asian PRSs had increased performance with increasing IA ancestry. The addition of 2 H/L SNPs increased performance for all PRSs, most notably in the samples with high IA ancestry and did not impact the performance of PRSs in individuals with lower IA ancestry. Conclusions: A single PRS that incorporates risk variants relevant to the multiple ancestral components of individuals from Latin America, instead of a set of ancestry specific panels, could be used in clinical practice. Impact: Results highlight the importance of population-specific discovery and suggest a straightforward approach to integrate ancestry specific variants into PRS for clinical application.
oncology,public, environmental & occupational health