Can relative rotation angle serve as a sensitive predictor for the development of adjacent segment degeneration after single-segment PLIF?

Xiao Liu,Haonan Liu,Xiaosong Yang,Zhongjun Liu,xiaoguang liu,Miao Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-18055/v1
2020-01-01
Abstract:Abstract Background: Adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) is a major issue after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Several studies have reported the potential causes of ASD based on radiography. However, the postoperative dynamic changes in the adjacent segments are not clear. This study aimed to determine the effect of PLIF on ASD using a formetric 4D system and to compare the effectiveness of this system with that of traditional radiography for the prediction of ASD. Methods: Eighty-five consecutive patients who underwent PLIF of a single-segmen t were included. The formetric 4Dsystem was used to calculate the relative rotation angle between the fusion segment and the upper and lower adjacent vertebrae preoperatively and at 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. The range of motion (ROM) and disc height (DH) of the adjacent segments were measured using radiography preoperatively and at 24 months postoperatively. At the final follow-up, the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to evaluate the surgical outcome. The patients were divided into two groups according to the occurrence of radiographic ASD: the ASD group with progression of degeneration and the N-ASD group without progression of degeneration. The clinical outcomes and measurement data between the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results: The index fusion segments included L2-3 to L5-S1. Preoperatively, the relative rotation angles between the fused segment and the upper and lower adjacent vertebrae were 5.1°±2.2°and 3.3°±2.0°,respectively, and both angles increased significantly at all time-points after surgery ( p <0.05). The angles changed most significantly during L2-3 fusion . Radiographic ASD was noted in 13 of 85 patients (15.3%) at 24 months. There was no significant difference in the DH, ROM, or clinical outcome between the two groups ( p >0.05), while the relative rotation angle with the upper adjacent vertebra was greater in the ASD group than in the N-ASD group ( p <0.05). Conclusion: The relative rotation angle with the adjacent vertebra increased significantly after lumbar fusion surgery. It may be a more sensitive predictor for the development ofradiographic ASD than flexion-extension ROM and DH.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?