Treatment of Old Vertebral Compression Fracture With Kyphosis by Different Reconstruction Methods: a Finite Element Analysis

Han Ye,Wang Xiaodong,Wu Jincheng,Xu Hanpeng,Zhang Zepei,Li Kepeng,Song Yang,Miao Jun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-129832/v1
2020-01-01
Abstract:Abstract Background: In repair of vertebral compression fractures, there is a lack of effective biomechanical verification as to whether only half of the vertebral body and the upper and lower intervertebral discs has any effect on spinal biomechanics; there also remains debate as to the appropriate length of fixation.Methods: A model of old vertebral compression fractures with kyphosis was established based on CT data. Vertebral column resection (VCR) and posterior unilateral vertebral resection and reconstruction (PUVCR) were performed at T12; long- and short-segment fixation methods were applied, and we analyzed biomechanical changes after surgery.Results: Range of motion (ROM) decreased in all fixed models, with lumbar VCR decreasing the most and short posterior unilateral vertebral resection and reconstruction (SPUVCR) decreasing the least; in the long posterior unilateral vertebral resection and reconstruction (LPUVCR) model, the internal fixation system produced the maximum VMS stress of 213.25 MPa in a lateral bending motion, and a minimum stress of 40.22 MPa in a lateral bending motion in the SVCR.Conclusion: There was little difference in thoracolumbar ROM between PUVCR and VCR models, while thoracolumbar ROM was smaller in long-segment fixation than in short-segment fixation. In all models, the VMS was greatest at the screw-rod junction and greatest at the ribcage–vertebral body interface, which partly explains the high probability of internal fixation failure and prosthesis migration in these two positions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?