Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Surgical Safety among Three Bone Graft Modalities in Spinal Tuberculosis: a Network Meta-Analysis

Jian Li,Xiuyu Qin,Jiani Wang,Wangzhe Yang,Junjun Bai,Jia Lv
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03876-5
IF: 2.6
2023-01-01
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Abstract:Autogenous granular bone graft (AG), autogenous massive bone graft (AM), and titanium mesh bone graft (TM) are the three commonly utilized bone implant methods for spinal tuberculosis. However, the gold standard is still controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and surgical safety of three primary bone graft modalities. For systematic literature review, several databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, were searched up to December 2022. Stata (version 14.0) was employed for data analysis. Our network meta-analysis included 517 patients from 7 articles whose qualities are acceptable based on our quality assessment criteria. In direct comparison, AG was associated with a shorter operation time (MD = 73.51; CI 30.65–116.37) and a lesser blood loss (MD = 214.30; CI 7.17–421.44) than AM. TM had fewer loss of Cobb angle than AG (MD = 1.45; CI 0.13–2.76) and AM (MD = 1.21; CI 0.42–1.99). Compared with AG, TM (MD = 0.96; CI 0.06–1.87) was related to a shorter bone graft fusion time. In indirect comparison, for the clinical parameters, the rank of CRP (from best to worst) was as follows: TM (58
What problem does this paper attempt to address?