Abstract:Body size is undoubtedly one of the most useful measures of sexual dimorphism and, by proxy, sexual selection. Here, I examine large, published datasets of average sexual size dimorphism (SSD) in four clades of amniotes: birds, mammals, squamates, and turtles. Most sexual variation is of subtle magnitude; attempts to discretely categorize species as monomorphic may overlook genuine and common sexual variations of small magnitude (e.g., <10–20% difference). Mammals, squamates, and turtles have unimodal SSD distributions centered close to zero that vary in skew. Mammals skew towards a preponderance of taxa with larger males than females, and mammals with the most extreme SSD have larger males than females. Turtles, however, skew strongly towards a preponderance of taxa with larger females than males, and turtles with the most extreme SSD have larger females than males. Squamates are intermediate to these two clades. Birds are unique in that they 1) are noticeably deficient in taxa near monomorphism, 2) have a bimodal distribution with peaks closely and roughly equidistantly straddling either side of monomorphism, and 3) have a high preponderance of taxa with larger males than females. This suggests stronger disruptive selection or constraints against monomorphism in birds compared to other amniotes. Bird data from yields bimodality, while other datasets do not, possibly due to data artefacts/errors. Although Rensch’s rule (RR) is difficult to apply to broad clades, scaling patterns were nevertheless examined here. While turtles and squamates show full adherence to RR, mammals show weaker adherence. Mammal scaling is comparatively less male-biased with increased size than scaling in squamates and turtles, and sex-role reversed mammals instead approach isometry between male and female size. Although bird taxa with larger males than females follow RR, sex-role reversed birds show the converse RR pattern. In birds, increasing size leads to increased dimorphism magnitude regardless of the direction of dimorphism, even though regression of the entire clade deceptively suggests they scale isometrically. This paradoxical scaling explains their unusual bimodal SSD distribution, as shown here through simulation. Equidistant bimodality from monomorphism might suggest disruptive selection where both mating systems have mirrored sexual selection dynamics of comparable effect. Scaling patterns between dimorphism magnitude and overall taxon size in non-reversed and reversed systems might not be readily apparent when examining the whole clade. Large mammals have disproportionately male-biased and more extreme SSD magnitudes. In comparison, large birds have relatively numerous sex-role reversed taxa as well as more extreme SSD magnitudes. These results deserve further testing with tighter phylogenetic controls and comparison of data sources. Additional ecological, physiological, and behavioral variables should also be examined in relation to SSD (e.g., altriciality vs. precociality, oviparity vs. viviparity, clutch size, neonate mass).

Large brain size is associated with low extra‐pair paternity across bird species

Extra-pair paternity and sexual dimorphism in birds

Sociality, ecology and developmental constraints predict variation in brain size across birds

Bird brains fit the bill: morphological diversification and the evolution of avian brain size

How much multiple paternity should we expect? A study of birds and contrast with mammals

Brain size mediates the choice of breeding strategy in the red‐backed shrike Lanius collurio

[Extrapair Paternity in Parus Major].

The contribution of extra-pair paternity to the variation in lifetime and age-specific male reproductive success in a socially monogamous species

Sex Allocation and Paternity in A Cooperatively Breeding Passerine: Evidence for the Male Attractiveness Hypothesis?

Increased hatching success as a direct benefit of polyandry in birds

Ultimate drivers of forced extra-pair copulations in birds lacking a penis: jackdaws as a case-study

Insight Into Body Size Evolution in Aves: Based on Some Body Size–Related Genes

Comparative support for the expensive tissue hypothesis: Big brains are correlated with smaller gut and greater parental investment in Lake Tanganyika cichlids

Where are extra-pair offspring raised: the mother’s, the father’s or the others’ nest?

Gestation length drives brain size and litter size variation in eutherian mammals

Extra‐pair paternity enhances the reproductive fitness of urban Chinese blackbird

Experimental translocations to low predation lead to non-parallel increases in relative brain size

Extra-pair paternity in two sympatric Aegithalos tits: patterns and implications

Body Attributes of Both Parents Jointly Affect Offspring Sex Allocation in A Socially Monogamous, Size-Monomorphic Passerine

DO BIRDS SHOW UNIQUE MACROEVOLUTIONARY PATTERNS OF SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM COMPARED TO OTHER AMNIOTES?

Disentangling the age-dependent causal pathways affecting multiple paternity in house sparrows