Immediate versus Postponed Drainage for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yu-wei Hu,Qin Zeng,Guang-yu Yang,Yu Wang,Lu Wang,Ming-wei Sun,Jun Zeng,Hua Jiang,Kai Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1770975/v1
2022-01-01
Abstract:Abstract BACKGROUND Acute pancreatitis is the most common gastrointestinal disease worldwide for hospital admission, and infected pancreatic and peripancreatic necrosis is a potentially lethal complication, which is the most dreadful one associated with a poor prognosis: mortality is approximately 15% and up to 30–39%. Depending on the very high mortality and morbidity, infected necrotizing pancreatitis always requires intervention at the early stage. The current standard approach for infected necrotizing pancreatitis is a minimally invasive step-up approach with catheter drainage as the first step. International guidelines advise delay in catheter drainage and antibiotics treatment until the infected collection has become a “wall-off”, which takes 4 weeks to develop. However, no clear evidence from clinical studies was seen to suggest superiority for the postponed catheter drainage. We will perform the first systematic review and meta-analysis to explore whether immediate catheter drainage improves the survival rate of patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis compare with postponed catheter drainage. Methods We will search the randomized controlled trial (RCT) literature involving and nonrandomized clinical cohort studies of immediate catheter drainage in patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis in 5 electric databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM). Studies including patients under 18 years of age or pregnant women will be excluded. We will define the overall mortality of patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis as the primary outcome. Besides, the incidences of bleeding resulting in intervention, perforation of a visceral organ leading to intervention, enterocutaneous fistula, pancreatic cutaneous fistula, incisional hernia and wound infection, the total length of stay, endocrine and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, and severe complications will be regarded as the secondary outcomes. Quality assessment of the included studies will be independently performed according to the Version 2 of the Cochrane tool for assessing the risk of bias in a randomized trial (RoB2) for RCTs and the Non-Randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) Tool for Observational Studies. Meanwhile, the level of evidence for results will be assessed by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method. All analyses will be conducted by using the RevMan (Version 5.4; Cochrane, Oxford, UK). Results From our study, we will ascertain whether immediate catheter drainage improves the survival rate of patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis compare with postponed catheter drainage. Trial registration: PROSPERO registration number CRD42021291734.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?