Abstract:Abstract BACKGROUND Acute pancreatitis is the most common gastrointestinal disease worldwide for hospital admission, and infected pancreatic and peripancreatic necrosis is a potentially lethal complication, which is the most dreadful one associated with a poor prognosis: mortality is approximately 15% and up to 30–39%. Depending on the very high mortality and morbidity, infected necrotizing pancreatitis always requires intervention at the early stage. The current standard approach for infected necrotizing pancreatitis is a minimally invasive step-up approach with catheter drainage as the first step. International guidelines advise delay in catheter drainage and antibiotics treatment until the infected collection has become a “wall-off”, which takes 4 weeks to develop. However, no clear evidence from clinical studies was seen to suggest superiority for the postponed catheter drainage. We will perform the first systematic review and meta-analysis to explore whether immediate catheter drainage improves the survival rate of patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis compare with postponed catheter drainage. Methods We will search the randomized controlled trial (RCT) literature involving and nonrandomized clinical cohort studies of immediate catheter drainage in patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis in 5 electric databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM). Studies including patients under 18 years of age or pregnant women will be excluded. We will define the overall mortality of patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis as the primary outcome. Besides, the incidences of bleeding resulting in intervention, perforation of a visceral organ leading to intervention, enterocutaneous fistula, pancreatic cutaneous fistula, incisional hernia and wound infection, the total length of stay, endocrine and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, and severe complications will be regarded as the secondary outcomes. Quality assessment of the included studies will be independently performed according to the Version 2 of the Cochrane tool for assessing the risk of bias in a randomized trial (RoB2) for RCTs and the Non-Randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) Tool for Observational Studies. Meanwhile, the level of evidence for results will be assessed by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method. All analyses will be conducted by using the RevMan (Version 5.4; Cochrane, Oxford, UK). Results From our study, we will ascertain whether immediate catheter drainage improves the survival rate of patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis compare with postponed catheter drainage. Trial registration: PROSPERO registration number CRD42021291734.

Early on-demand drainage versus standard management among acute necrotizing pancreatitis patients complicated by persistent organ failure: The protocol for an open-label multi-center randomized controlled trial

Early On-Demand Drainage or Standard Management for Acute Pancreatitis Patients with Acute Necrotic Collections and Persistent Organ Failure: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Immediate versus Postponed Drainage for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Early versus delayed intervention in necrotizing acute pancreatitis complicated by persistent organ failure

Impact of the Timing of Percutaneous Catheter Drainage following Endoscopic Drainage on Outcomes in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis

Primary Pancreatic Lymphoma Diagnosed by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy

How to Identify the Indications for Early Intervention in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis Patients: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study.

Open Necrosectomy Combined with Continuous Positive Drainage and Prophylactic Diverting Loop Ileostomy for Late Infected Pancreatic Necrosis: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Early selective enteral feeding in combination with active decompression of duodenum in treatment of moderate and severe acute pancreatitis - A proof-of-concept clinical study

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Local Complications of Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis in China: A National Survey

Robotic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic and Periampullary Tumors (PORTAL): a Study Protocol for a Multicenter Phase III Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial

Efficacy of Early Percutaneous Catheter Drainage in Acute Pancreatitis of Varying Severity Associated with Sterile Acute Inflammatory Pancreatic Fluid Collection

Continuous negative pressure irrigation and endoscopic debridement in treating patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis

Late Infection of Pancreatic Necrosis: A Separate Entity in Necrotizing Pancreatitis with Low Mortality

The Clinical Outcome from Early Versus Delayed Minimally Invasive Intervention for Infected Pancreatic Necrosis: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Minimally invasive percutaneous catheter drainage versus open laparotomy with temporary closure for treatment of abdominal compartment syndrome in patients with early-stage severe acute pancreatitis

Early versus delayed necrosectomy in pancreatic necrosis: A population-based cohort study on readmission, healthcare utilization, and in-hospital mortality

The effect of a novel minimally invasive strategy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis

Repetitive endoscopic drainage as initial intervention is safe and effective for early treatment of pancreatic necrotic collections

Does the Efficiency of Percutaneous Catheter Drainage Equal in Treating with Acute Peripancreatic Fluid Collection Induced by Acute Pancreatitis with Various Degree of Severity

Effective percutaneous treatment of severe necrotizing pancreatitis: a case report